ARTICLE
8 October 2024

A Critical Crossroads: The Vice-Presidential Debate And Environmental Regulatory Impacts

JW
Jones Walker

Contributor

At Jones Walker, we look beyond today’s challenges and focus on the opportunities of the future. Since our founding in May 1937 by Joseph Merrick Jones, Sr., and Tulane Law School graduates William B. Dreux and A.J. Waechter, we have consistently asked ourselves a simple question: What can we do to help our clients succeed, today and tomorrow?
Tuesday's vice-presidential debate between candidates JD Vance and Tim Walz once again brought to the forefront the independent stances that the two parties maintain on environmental and energy policy issues.
United States Environment

Tuesday's vice-presidential debate between candidates JD Vance and Tim Walz once again brought to the forefront the independent stances that the two parties maintain on environmental and energy policy issues.

Both candidates recognized the tragedy of Hurricane Helene before being directly questioned about their positions on climate change and carbon emission policies. JD Vance approached the question by focusing on protecting American manufacturing and signaled concern that restrictive environmental regulations could hinder industry. Walz focused on protective measures aimed at reducing carbon emissions and promoting climate investments. Walz noted that both parties agree on the importance of promoting American jobs.

As illustrated, they have different priorities to achieving that goal.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More