On May 26, 2017, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware announced new procedures for assigning cases and handling case-dispositive issues.
The new procedures stem from two important developments. First, the court currently has only two active Article III judges—Chief Judge Stark and Judge Andrews—and two vacancies resulting from Judge Sleet and Judge Robinson having taken senior status earlier this year, with Senior Judge Robinson retiring this coming July. Second, earlier in May, the U.S. Supreme Court decided TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods Group Brands, which interpreted "residence" for purposes of patent venue as limited to a domestic corporation's state of incorporation. The new procedures have particular importance for intellectual-property litigators given that Delaware is already one of the busiest districts for patent filings, and TC Heartland will likely cause its patent docket to spike, given the disproportionate number of corporations incorporated in Delaware.
Notable procedures related to patent cases include:
- The court will assign new civil cases to Chief Judge Stark, Judge Andrews, Senior Judge Sleet, and the "vacant judgeship docket." This procedure is consistent with the court's earlier announcement that "Judge Sleet intends to render substantial judicial service as a senior judge."
- The court will assign cases in the vacant judgeship docket to one of three magistrate judges in the district for case management. When a party files a "case-dispositive" motion (such as a claim-construction brief or summary-judgment motion), the case will be assigned to a visiting judge.
- The court will use a "roster of visiting judges" that currently includes four judges from the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Judge Kent Jordan from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Judge Jordan previously served as a district court judge in Delaware and continues to preside over multiple cases in the district.
- The court will immediately begin reassigning Senior Judge Robinson's cases to visiting judges with the goal of reassigning "the overwhelming majority" of those cases to visiting judges by July 2017.
The court explained that these procedures "are subject to change at any time." The court also noted that it expects to increase the roster of visiting judges if "the current vacancies persist."
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.