United States:
Eleventh Circuit Rejects Marks – Holds Device Is Not An ATDS Unless Random Or Sequential Number Generator Utilized
13 February 2020
Squire Patton Boggs LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Hi friends,
Well, we have some huge news to report –
the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal held yesterday that an
automated telephone dialing system for TCPA purposes requires the
use of a random or sequential number generator.
The court specifically rejected the rational of Marks v.
Crunch Gym and determined that the statutory definition of
ATDS requires the use of a random or sequential number
generator.
Tcpaworld.com will have full team coverage of the ruling
and its likely impact across the nation. Stay tuned for more.
Thanks friends. Chat soon.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from United States
Defenses To Contract Damages In New York
KI Legal
Defendants who face breach of contract damages claims can assert several defenses to mitigate, or altogether eliminate, a potential award of damages against them.
Is Premises Liability The Same As Negligence?
Ward and Smith, P.A.
In today's world, we travel all the time. We shop at grocery stores and department stores, we take walks on the sidewalks in our neighborhoods, and we go to large events, such as concerts or weddings, at various venues.
Defamation vs. Free Speech
Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs
The concepts of defamation and free speech often collide, raising questions about where the line should be drawn between the right to express oneself and the responsibility...