ARTICLE
22 October 2024

Revolut And Fraud Complaints

RR
Rahman Ravelli Solicitors

Contributor

Rahman Ravelli is known for its sophisticated, bespoke and robust representation of corporates, senior business executives and professionals in national and international matters.
It is one of the fastest-growing and most highly-regarded, market-leading legal practices in its field. This is due to its achievements in criminal and regulatory investigations and large-scale commercial disputes involving corporate wrongdoing and multi-jurisdictional enforcement, and its asset recovery, internal investigations and compliance expertise.
The firm’s global reach, experienced litigators and network of trusted partner firms ensure it can address legal matters for clients anywhere in the world. It combines astute business intelligence and shrewd legal expertise with proactive, creative strategies to secure the best possible outcome for all its clients.
Rahman Ravelli’s achievements in certain cases have even helped shape the law. It is regularly engaged by other law firms to provide independent advice.

Revolut faced nearly 10,000 fraud complaints last year, topping UK banks in fraud reports. Criticism surrounds its slow response times and inadequate fraud prevention measures. The investigation highlights the need for stronger anti-fraud procedures.
United Kingdom Criminal Law

Niall Hearty considers an investigation into customer dissatisfaction with the bank.

Revolut was named in more reports of fraud in the last financial year than any of the major High Street banks.

The firm, which only received a provisional UK banking licence in July, was cited in almost 10,000 complaints to Action Fraud, the UK's reporting centre for fraud and cybercrime.

The figures, which were obtained through Freedom of Information (FOI) requests made by the BBC's investigative programme Panorama, show that Revolut topped the list for fraud complaints. It was followed by Barclays, which was named almost 8,000 times, Monzo (almost 5,000) and Starling (1,000).

The BBC investigation included testimony from a Revolut customer who had £165,000 taken from his business account in a matter of minutes by fraudsters who evaded fraud controls. The customer said there was no dedicated fraud helpline for Revolut customers, only a chat function on the bank's app. It took him 23 minutes to reach the right department to freeze the account – by which time another £67,000 had been taken by the fraudsters.

There has been criticism that Revolut may have cut corners as it sought to grow as quickly as possible. While such an accusation cannot, for now at least, be proved, the damning statistics do indicate that Revolut does need to make some major changes to its anti-fraud procedures – and probably should have done so before now.

Issues such as identity checks and monitoring of transactions need to be assessed and addressed so that the risks are identified and nullified. For a bank that was averaging almost a thousand fraud-related complaints a month, Revolut certainly has questions to answer about its response – or lack of one - to the problems its customers were regularly raising.

It is less than a month since Starling – another rapidly-growing new bank on the block – was fined £28.9 million by the Financial Conduct Authority for sanctions failings relating to a lack of screening of new customers. Revolut has not paid as high a financial price for its failings as Starling but its reputation has suffered. In banking, it seems the rush to become the biggest will not necessarily make you the best.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Find out more and explore further thought leadership around Criminal Law

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More