ARTICLE
31 July 2026

Disclosure Review Working Group Publishes Summary Of Stakeholder Survey Results

KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Contributor

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer is a world-leading global law firm, where our ambition is to help you achieve your goals. Exceptional client service and the pursuit of excellence are at our core. We invest in and care about our client relationships, which is why so many are longstanding. We enjoy breaking new ground, as we have for over 170 years. As a fully integrated transatlantic and transpacific firm, we are where you need us to be. Our footprint is extensive and committed across the world’s largest markets, key financial centres and major growth hubs. At our best tackling complexity and navigating change, we work alongside you on demanding litigation, exacting regulatory work and complex public and private market transactions. We are recognised as leading in these areas. We are immersed in the sectors and challenges that impact you. We are recognised as standing apart in energy, infrastructure and resources. And we’re focused on areas of growth that affect every business across the world.
The Disclosure Review Working Group (DRWG), which is considering the potential simplification of disclosure rules for the Business and Property Courts, has today published a brief update on progress...
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Alan Watts’s articles from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP are most popular:
  • within Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)
  • in European Union
  • with readers working within the Property industries
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP are most popular:
  • within Wealth Management, Technology and Employment and HR topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel

The Disclosure Review Working Group (DRWG), which is considering the potential simplification of disclosure rules for the Business and Property Courts, has today published a brief update on progress, including a summary of the stakeholder survey it conducted earlier in the year.

The update states that the DRWG aims to produce proposals for the simplification of the regime under Practice Direction 57AD, with a view to reducing complexity, front-loading and cost, but will not be recommending a simple return to Part 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules (which continues to govern disclosure in cases falling outside the PD 57AD regime). 

In its previous update (which we reported on here) the DRWG noted that the majority of survey respondents did not agree that the reforms in PD 57AD had been a success. The summary now published adds further detail, indicating that only 19% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the reforms had been a success, while 64% disagreed or strongly disagreed, and only 13% supported retaining the regime essentially as it is. A key concern was the cost of the regime, with 67% of respondents expressing the view that the proportion of total case costs attributable to disclosure had increased under PD 57AD. 

The summary also reports positive views, however, with a number of benefits identified including better tailoring of disclosure to the type and size of case, greater accuracy, and earlier engagement between parties. Support was expressed for retaining the obligation to disclose known adverse documents, and initial disclosure was also seen as having value in appropriate cases.

According to the update, the DRWG hopes to be able to consult on a series of recommendations later this year or early next year.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More