ARTICLE
22 January 2025

Robot Judge: Science Fiction Or Near Future?

E
Ellex

Contributor

Achieving stellar results can be challenging. But with Ellex as a trusted strategic partner, you have a team of 250+ experienced and knowledgeable legal specialists to help your business develop winning strategies. Drawing on 30 years of local expertise from across the Baltics, Ellex’s interconnected network will support and drive your success.

Ellex represents the pinnacle of legal excellence in the Baltics and has set a new standard for legal innovation. With Ellex by your side as a strategic partner, our award-winning legal services allow you to take on new challenges and set foot where no others have before.

Ellex is at the forefront of digital innovation — incorporating digital law to accelerate your results. No matter your level of digital competence, you’ll benefit from cutting-edge legal infrastructure that will take your success to a new realm of outer space.

Just like client success, the health and future of the planet are paramount. That’s why Ellex proactively engages in sus

Ellex in Estonia dispute resolution expert Karl Joonas Kendla explores the concept of a "robot judge" and examines if it might realistically take over judicial roles traditionally held by human judges.
Estonia Technology

Ellex in Estonia dispute resolution expert Karl Joonas Kendla explores the concept of a "robot judge" and examines if it might realistically take over judicial roles traditionally held by human judges. Initially, the idea was viewed as a fantasy, but recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) challenge that assumption.

For example, in China, AI systems already support judicial functions by generating judgments in internet courts, though under human oversight. The European Union has labeled judicial AI as a high-risk technology, highlighting potential concerns around bias, transparency, and the fundamental rights of individuals in the judicial process.

In Estonia, while no AI judges are in use, the possibility of AI-based legal decision-making raises questions about the "monopoly of justice." This principal limit judicial decision-making to human judges within the judiciary, guarding against external influence and protecting public interest. Kendla argues that deploying AI in a decision-making capacity would require strict safeguards to ensure adherence to constitutional principles, judicial independence, and impartiality. The article suggests that AI may have practical uses in specific cases, but a purely AI-driven judicial system remains contentious and could challenge the essence of justice as a human-centered process.

Full article available in Estonian juridica.ee

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More