- with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy industries
- within Compliance topic(s)
In its consistent effort to promote cross border trade and ease
of doing business, the Reserve Bank of India
('RBI') initially floated the draft export
and import regulations and directions on 2 July 2024, and 4 April
2025, inviting comments from the stakeholders.
Following the two rounds of stakeholder consultations and the
receipt of multiple industry representations, the RBI notified the
Foreign Exchange Management (Export and Import of
Goods and Services) Regulations, 2026 ('New
Regulations') on 13 January 2026, followed by the
issuance of the Directions on Export and Import of Goods and
Services ('New Directions') on 16
January 2026 (collectively the '2026
Update').
The New Regulationsintroduces much-needed rationalisation and
simplification of the legislative framework governing trade, i.e.,
export and import transactions in India. The changes are aimed at
enhancing ease of doing business while affording greater
operational flexibility to authorised dealer banks ('AD
Bank'), in recognition of the evolving dynamics of
cross-border transactions.
This article examines the key insights into the current trade
framework and highlights the substantive reforms introduced under
the 2026 Update.
Implementation timeline
The 2026 Updateshall come into force from 1 October 2026.
Upon its implementation, the Foreign Exchange Management (Export of Goods &
Services) Regulations, 2015 , Master Direction – Export of Goods and
Services, Master Direction – Import of Goods and
Services and the list of 167 circulars specified in the
annexure to the New Directions (collectively the
'Existing Provisions') shall stand
superseded.
Action point for stakeholders
- Review of the current transactions, payment cycles, banking arrangements and specific permissions obtained from the RBI.
- Aligning the business with the proposed changes
- Transition management for export and import payments, MTT transactions and trade advances.
- Drafting and review of contracts with global trade counterparts.
- Review of the open entries in the Export Data Processing and
Monitoring System ('EDPMS') and Import
Data Processing and Monitoring System
('IDPMS') for regularisation of
trade.
Relevant changes proposed to be implemented vide the New
Regulations are summarised below:
1. Declaration of exports and handling of
documents
| Existing Provisions |
New Regulations |
|
| Export of goods |
|
|
| Export of services | No reporting requirement |
The exporter will be required to file EDF for reporting export of services within 30 days from the end of the month in which invoice for such export has been raised |
| Export of software | Form SOFTEX |
The exporter will be required to file EDF for reporting export of software within 30 days from the end of the month in which invoice for such export has been raised |
Notable changes vide
the New Regulations:
- An exporter may file a single EDF to report all service and software exports made to multiple recipients during a month.
- Exporters of services other than software, may submit the EDF on or before the date they receive payment for the export.
- The New Regulations introduces a new reporting obligation for exporters of services.
- The AD Bank may grant an extension for submitting the EDF if it is satisfied that the exporter's reason for the delay is valid.
- The New Regulations and the EDF (as provided in the Annex
of the New Regulations) shall permit the export value to be
reported as 'nil' in instances where goods are exported
without consideration, and no prior approval from the RBI will be
required in such cases.
LKS COMMENTS
The New Regulations introduces a unified, streamlined and
time-bound reporting for exports of goods, services, and software.
Although this expands the reporting obligations but at the same
time it also simplifies the procedural complexity and enhances
consistency for exporters and AD Banks.
It appears that the requirement of obtaining EDF waiver shall
be discontinued. Export of goods without any consideration shall be
required to be reported with 'nil' value in EDF.
2. Timeline of payment for export and import of
goods, services and software
|
Existing Provisions |
New Regulations | |
| Import payment |
Payment pertaining to import is required to be made within 6 months from the date of shipment (AD Banks can grant extension upto 6 months at a time upto a maximum period of 3 years) |
The New Regulations propose that the payment timeline pertaining to import shall be based on the underlying contract between the importer and the overseas seller [The AD Bank may grant extension basis their Internal Policy and Standard Operating Procedure ('SOP')] |
| Export payment |
Payment pertaining to export is required to be realised within
(AD Banks can grant extension upto 6 months at a time) |
The New Regulations stipulate that payments relating to export transactions must be realised within:
|
Notable changes vide
the New Regulations:
- The AD Bank may credit or debit an exporter's or importer's account for export receipts or import payments only after verifying the bona fide of the transaction and updating or closing the related entry in the EDPMS or IDPMS.
- For trades where the bill of entry or shipping bill (for goods)
or invoice (for services or software) is up to ₹10 lakh (or
its foreign currency equivalent), the RBI shall permit
reconciliation and closure of EDPMS/IDPMS entries based on a
trader's declaration confirming realisation of export proceeds
or completion of import payment. Traders may submit this
declaration to the AD Bank on a quarterly, consolidated basis for
bulk reconciliation and closure of entries.
LKS COMMENTS
The New Regulations propose a notable change wherein Indian
traders may be permitted to store their goods in the overseas
warehouse for more than 15 months from the shipment date without
being required to realise the export proceeds, as the realisation
timeline pertaining to export shall be linked to the 'date of
sale' of the goods instead of shipment of the goods from India.
Additionally, AD Banks have been authorised to grant extensions for
both export and import timelines for goods and services.
The RBI vide its Notification No. FEMA 23(R)/(7)/2025-RB, dated
November 13, 2025, extended the export realisation timeline from 9
months to 15 months. The same time period has been retained in the
New Regulations. The timeline pertaining to import transactions
shall be based on the underlying contract. The revision in timeline
will offer greater flexibility to traders in managing their funds
and operations. Interestingly, an additional time-period of three
months is being provided for export realisation where export of
goods and services are invoiced or/and settled in Indian
Rupees.
Additionally, the New Regulations has introduced more clarity
in terms of realisation of export proceeds by including set-off
between parties as a valid realisation method. This is in line with
the jurisprudence under Income Tax and Indirect Taxes where set-off
between two parties was considered as valid realisation of foreign
exchange.
3. Set-off of export receivables with import
payables
|
Existing Provisions |
New Regulations | |
| Set – off |
Restrictive conditions for set-off:
(set-offs with overseas group/associate companies may be processed on a net or gross basis via in-house or outsourced centralized settlement arrangements)
|
|
LKS COMMENTS
Set-off of payment pertaining to goods against services is
prohibited under the Existing Provisions. The New Regulations
substantially liberalises this position by permitting set-off
against any payables, whether relating to goods or services between
the eligible parties. This change significantly enhances
transactional flexibility and cash flow efficiency by enabling
businesses to net their cross-border obligations more effectively,
irrespective of the nature of the underlying transaction.
Importantly, the amendment aligns the regulatory framework with
commercial realities, recognising the increasingly integrated and
blended nature of goods and services in cross-border trade and
specifically with the increase in warehouse exports with add-on
fulfilment services from overseas counterparts.
4. Third party receipts and payment
|
Existing Provisions |
New Regulations | |
| Third party payment and receipts in case of import and export transactions |
The Existing Provisions permit third party payment subject to the following conditions:
|
|
LKS COMMENTS
Thedraft Foreign Exchange Management (Export and
Import of Goods and Services) Regulations, 2025introduced
a relaxation permitting AD Banks to process payments to or receipts
from parties other than the declared third party, subject to
verification of the bona fide nature of the underlying
transactions. This provision has been removed in the New
Regulations. Notwithstanding this omission, the revised framework
significantly streamlines the overall process governing third party
payments when compared with the existing regulatory requirements.
The requirement for a tripartite agreement although not addressed
in the New Regulations might stem from the AD Bank's internal
policy or SOP.
5. Reduction in the export
realization
|
Existing Provisions |
New Regulations | |
| Reduction in invoice value of exports |
Under the Existing Provisions, reduction in invoices is permitted by the AD Bank in the following cases:
Others:
|
|
|
Write-off of outstanding receivable |
|
|
| Surrender of Export Incentives | A proportionate surrender of export incentives is required to be made by the exporter (incentives under FTP, GST, etc.) |
There are no provisions in the New Regulations pertaining to refund of export incentives. |
Notable changes vide
the New Regulations:
- The AD Bank have been bestowed with immense power to close the pending EDPMS entries which are linked to any under-realisation or non-realisation of invoices.
- The option of self write-off of export receivables has been omitted.
LKS COMMENTS
Under the Existing Provisions, reductions in export invoice
value are permitted by AD Banks only for specific reasons, such as
cash discounts etc, and are subject to limits. Additionally, RBI
permission is also required in specific cases for write-off of
receivables. The New Regulations introduces a significantly
flexible approach wherein shipping bill or invoices upto INR 10
lakhs can be reduced solely on the basis of exporter's
declaration. This reduces administrative burden on the AD Banks for
small transactions and provides operational flexibility for
exporters, particularly SMEs or smaller-value
transactions.
In contrast to the Existing Provisions, the New Regulations do
not specifically address the requirement of surrendering the export
incentives under the FTP, GST or any other government's export
promotion schemes. It appears that the refund of export incentives
will be governed by the respective statutes and policies providing
incentives to exporters.
It will be interesting to note AD Bank's stance on clearing
out multiple invoices for its clientele since self-write-off of
export invoices will be discontinued. Different policies adopted by
different AD Banks might also result in
'bank-shopping'.
6. Advance for exports and imports
|
Existing Provisions |
New Regulations | |
| Advance for export and import |
For export:
For import:
Goods: USD 5 million Services: USD 0.5 million Aviation sector: USD 50 million
|
For export:
For import:
|
| Rate of interest of advance payment |
Interest on such advance payments may be levied only up to a maximum rate of 100 basis points above LIBOR |
The exporter or importer, as the case maybe, will be required to ensure that any interest payable on advance export receipts or delayed import payments does not exceed the all-in-cost ceiling of trade credit as specified under the Foreign Exchange Management (Borrowing and Lending) Regulations, 2018 |
LKS COMMENTS
The New Regulations governing advance receipts for imports
reflect a more flexible framework, placing greater importance on
the underlying contract and the discretionary powers of the AD
Bank. The specific timeline relaxation is intended to support
exporters who face genuine delays in shipping goods after receipt
of the advance payment. However, the mechanism for refunding
unutilized advance amounts requires further
clarification.
7. Caution listing
|
Existing Provisions |
New Regulations | |
| Caution listing |
|
|
| De-caution listing |
An exporter is removed from the RBI caution list upon the AD Bank's recommendation |
LKS COMMENTS
Caution listing led to reputational risk for exporters and
often led to operational restrictions for future trade
transactions. Reducing the formal caution listing process shall
reduce the regulatory burden and will boost more cross border
transactions.
8. Merchanting Trade Transaction
(MTT)
|
Existing Provisions |
New Regulations | |
| Governed by |
Presently, MTT transactions are governed by the Merchanting Trade Guidelines, 2020 |
The Merchanting Trade Guidelines, 2020 will stand superseded once the 2026 Update comes into effect on October 1, 2026 |
| Conditions |
The transaction must be profitable |
The profitability requirement is omitted in the New Regulations |
| Timeline |
The entire transaction should be completed within 9 months |
The outer timeline requirement is omitted in the New Regulations |
| Payment |
The outlay period between the outward and inward remittance shall not exceed 6 months |
The New Regulations propose that the period between the outward remittance and inward remittance or vice versa should not exceed six months However, the AD Bank may extend such timeline upon being satisfied that the reasons for the delay are justified |
| Commission |
Except in exception circumstances permitted by the AD Banks, agency commissions are not permitted in MTT |
The prohibition relating to agency commission is omitted in the New Regulations |
| Write-off |
Specific criteria prescribed under the MTT Guidelines |
No separate provisions for MTT |
| Third party payments | Not allowed |
|
Notable changes vide
the New Regulations:
- The New Regulations allow for an extension of the timeline between the outward remittance and the corresponding inward remittance.
- The present requirement to compulsorily hold the inward remittances in the merchanting trader's Exchange Earners Foreign Currency (EEFC) account if received before outward remittance has been omitted in the New Regulations.
- The New Regulations further mandate that documents evidencing
MTT must be submitted to the AD Bank to verify the authenticity of
the transaction. Once satisfied, the AD Bank will credit or debit
the customer's account for any MTT‑related
cross‑border transaction and simultaneously update the
relevant entries in the EDPMS and IDPMS.
LKS COMMENTS
The relaxation of MTT conditions and compliance requirements is
expected to ease operational processes. However, it remains to be
seen how AD Banks will frame their policies on write‑off
provisions specifically for MTT, as the New Regulations do not
explicitly address the same.
The removal of mandatory profits and 9 months' timeline for
completing MTT is a welcome move. The permissibility of third-party
payments for MTT transactions represents a significant operational
flexibility, thereby helping overcome logistical or geographical
constraints. Businesses can now route payments through
intermediaries or group entities, which is particularly useful in
complex cross-border supply chains.
Other notable highlights in the 2026 Update:
- Import of gold and silver – AD Banks shall not permit any advance remittance for the import of gold and silver unless specifically permitted under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 or the rules, regulations and directions framed thereunder.
- Project Export – AD Banks may allow receipts and payments related to project exports based on the terms of the project contract, after confirming the bona fide of the project. Project exporters are also permitted to use temporary cash surpluses earned abroad for short‑term investments (maturity of one year or less), such as treasury bills or bank deposits outside India, under the monitoring of their AD Bank. The Memorandum of Instructions on Project and Service Exports (PEM), 2014 will be repealed w.e.f. October 1, 2026.
- Miscellaneous– Under the current legislative framework, grievance redressal has largely been undertaken in accordance with the RBI directions. However, unlike the existing provisions, the New Regulations grant AD Banks greater operational autonomy to approve payment timelines or extensions for receipt of payments, as well as to permit set-offs and reduction in export realisation, based on the bona fide nature of the underlying transactions.
- AD Banks's Internal Policy
- The New Regulations grants AD Banks increased authority and responsibility, requiring them to formulate detailed internal policies and SOPs for transaction handling and reporting, and to make these publicly available on their websites.
- AD Banks must clearly delegate transaction approval responsibilities, establish a structured escalation mechanism for customer grievances, and set up an appeal mechanism for review at higher levels.
- AD Banks are required to ensure that transaction‑related charges remain reasonable and proportionate.
- The AD Banks are not permitted to impose any penalties for regulatory delays or compliance breaches.
- The AD Bank must route all reference to the RBI through the
PRAVAAH portal and report any suspicious transaction to the
Directorate of Enforcement (DoE).
LKS COMMENTS
Cross-border trade plays a vital role in boosting a
country's economic growth. With accelerated globalisation,
India is emerging as one of the major players in the global supply
chain.
Through the 2026 Update, the RBI aims to create a more
business‑friendly environment and promote ease of doing
business by allowing greater contractual flexibility and aligning
the regulatory framework with evolving cross‑border trade
dynamics. By omitting certain regulatory hurdles which deter
potential overseas trade collaboration and granting wider
discretion to AD Banks in trade‑related matters, the RBI
enables AD Banks to tailor internal policies and SOPs to suit
operational requirements.
The new regulatory framework is intended to boost more cross
border trade and position India as a bigger market player in the
global supply chain.
However, this increased flexibility may also result in
inconsistencies in interpretation and implementation of the 2026
Update across different AD Banks. Furthermore, several critical
issues remain unaddressed in the 2026 Update which inter-alia
includes:
- Treatment of exports carried out under operating lease arrangements;
- Clarifications related to long-term supply contracts;
- Permissibility of agency commissions in merchanting trade transactions;
- Imports on FOC (free-of-cost) basis;
- Trade with Asian Clearing Union (ACU) countries and jurisdictions under OFAC sanctions; and
- Provisions relating to ongoing or legacy trade
transactions.
The 2026 Update is a welcome change to encourage cross
border trade and position India as a global business hub. However,
the true extent of such liberalisation shall depend on how AD Banks
formulate and implement their internal policies.
The RBI has also published its responses to various
stakeholder representations made in the past 2 years. The same can
be accessed here.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.