- within Employment and HR topic(s)
- in European Union
- in European Union
- in European Union
- in European Union
- in European Union
- in European Union
- in European Union
- in European Union
- in European Union
- within Environment, Privacy and Insurance topic(s)
The HR in the Know 2/2026 outlines significant changes to employment law and social security regulations taking effect from January 2026. Key amendments include the abolition of the mandatory written form for certain HR documents, allowing more processes to be handled electronically; a new deadline for paying cash equivalents for unused holiday leave, aligning payment with the last salary; and increased employee representation in Company Social Benefits Fund matters, requiring at least two representatives where no trade union exists. Additionally, changes to sick leave rules expand the Social Insurance Institution's (ZUS) powers to monitor sick notes and clarify permissible activities during sick leave, with further reforms planned for mid-April and then 2027 affecting employees with multiple insurance bases. Employers are advised to, in among others, review and update internal policies and IT systems to ensure compliance with these new requirements.
First changes in employment law in 2026
January is traditionally a month of amendments or the introduction of new regulations – and this year is no different. After the end of 2025, which was rich in legislative changes and the publication of further draft bills (which we discussed in more detail in previous editions of our newsletter available here), the new year has also brought a number of changes to employment laws and social security regulations. The common denominator of these legal changes is "deregulation". Until now, deregulation has generally bypassed employment law provisions – time will tell whether this is the beginning of a new legislative trend or rather an exception to the rule.
Abolition of the written form for certain HR documents
As part of deregulation in the HR area, from 27 January this
year, selected employee documents that previously had to be
prepared in writing (i.e. hardcopy with a handwritten wet-ink
signature or as a PDF file with a qualified electronic signature)
will be able to be prepared in either simple paper or electronic
form. Thus, it will be possible to submit them to the other party,
for example, by email (without a qualified e-signature).
This simplification of formalities will mainly apply to employee
requests related to determining and accounting for their working
time, including by applying working hours agreed specifically for a
given inpidual (inpidual working time schedule or flexible working
hours), a special working time system (weekend work system or
shortened working week), as well as requests for time off in lieu
of overtime or to deal with personal matters. On the employer's
side, the de-formalization will apply, among others, to
notifications to the trade union of the intention to terminate an
employee's employment contract and information about the
transfer of an undertaking or part thereof to another employer, as
well as to the form of setting work schedules for employees.
Moving away from the written form is a step in the right direction,
but employers are also expecting a similar change for other key
employment law documents. Work is ongoing on a draft act amending
the act on the IT system for handling certain contracts (the draft
e-contracts act), which aims to digitalise and simplify the process
of concluding, amending and terminating contracts such as
employment contracts or contracts of mandate.
What does this mean for employers? After the
changes, a greater number of employee requests will be able to be
processed via company IT systems, allowing for further
digitalisation and streamlining of HR processes. Employers should
therefore check whether their internal policies and procedures
(including work regulations) should soon be updated in this
respect, and whether the functionalities of their IT systems should
be extended to allow the acceptance of requests from employees that
previously required written form.
New deadline for payment of cash equivalent for unused holiday leave
Currently, cash equivalent for holiday leave not used by an
employee by the effective date of termination of employment should
be paid on the last day of employment. After 27 January, this cash
equivalent will be paid together with the last salary. If the pay
date falls before the employee's last day of employment, the
cash equivalent will be paid within 10 days of the termination of
employment.
What does this mean for employers? Settling
accounts with departing employees may be easier in practice; in
most cases, the employer will pay all benefits due on termination
of employment in a single cash transfer. Until now, in such
situations the employer's payroll had to make an additional
transfer, outside the monthly salary payment date. This was all the
more challenging when, in a short period of time, the employer
terminated contracts with a larger number of employees whose last
day of employment fell on different dates.
Greater employee representation in Social Benefits Fund matters
The changes entering into force at the end of January also
provide for an increase in the number of employee representatives
with whom issues concerning the Company Social Benefits Fund must
be agreed at employers where there are no trade unions. Until now,
issues related to the social fund, such as opting out of the social
fund or the content of the social fund regulations, required the
consent of one employee representative. After the amendment, there
will have to be at least two such representatives.
What does this mean for employers? Employers will
have to involve a greater representation of employees in matters
relating to the company social fund, which may require additional
actions, such as organising elections for a second employee
representative.
New rules for taking and controlling sick leave
At the end of January, some changes to the rules for taking sick
leave and monitoring use of such leave will come into force.
Further changes in this area will come into force in mid-April and
from 1 January 2027.
From 27 January 2026, the Social Insurance Institution (ZUS) will
gain broader powers to control sick notes, including verifying the
correctness of issuing sick notes due to the necessity of
personally caring for a sick family member (primarily so-called
sick note/leave for a sick child).
From 13 April 2026, employees will be able, during sick leave, to
perform ordinary daily activities or incidental activities
(including those related to gainful employment) caused by
significant circumstances, without fear of losing their sick pay.
Until now, such actions by an employee during sick leave, such as
signing an invoice or contract or having a brief telephone
conversation with a supervisor, could potentially be considered
gainful employment or activity inconsistent with the purpose of the
sick leave, which was grounds for depriving the employee of sick
pay for the entire period of leave. An employer's instruction
will not be considered a significant circumstance. It has also been
clarified what is meant by gainful employment and activities
inconsistent with the purpose of sick leave.
Further changes include the rules governing verification of sick
notes (L-4), including further extension of audit powers for ZUS
and contribution payers (employers).
The most significant changes from the employer's perspective
will only come into force in 2027:
- an insured person who has two insurance basis (e.g. an employee working for two employers) will be able to use sick leave only with one of those employers (and continue to perform work for the other, if the nature of the second job allows).
- the insured person will be subject to a single benefit (allowance) period, regardless of the number of insurance basis (also in abovementioned cases where the employee is on sick leave with one employer and working at another company).
What does this mean for employers? The possibility of using sick leave under one, rather than all, insurance basis may lead to abuses, e.g. employees taking sick leave in one company to have more time to perform duties in another organisation. A certain (albeit insufficient) safeguard is the obligation to notify the employer (the contribution payer) about taking sick leave under another insurance title. After receiving such notification from the employee, the employer should carefully examine what activities the employee undertakes during the sick leave period. In the spring, employers will also gain new possibilities to control employees' sick leave.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.