ARTICLE
14 February 2025

Expanded Definition Of Ordinary Wages May Increase Employer Labor Costs And Liabilities

W
WTW

Contributor

At WTW, we provide data-driven, insight-led solutions in the areas of people, risk and capital that make your organization more resilient, motivate your workforce, and maximize performance.

We work shoulder to shoulder with you, bringing diverse points of view and a deep commitment to your success.

By challenging one another, we achieve breakthroughs because only the best ideas survive. The result? Innovative solutions that meet your needs—informed by the global view and the local understanding of our colleagues around the world.

Together, we broaden your horizon and sharpen your focus.

Transform your toughest challenges into actionable opportunities.

And set your path for sustainable success.

A South Korean Supreme Court ruling requiring certain bonuses and other non-fixed wages to be included when calculating overtime pay, severance and other benefits may lead to spikes in employer costs.
South Korea Employment and HR

A South Korean Supreme Court ruling requiring certain bonuses and other non-fixed wages to be included when calculating overtime pay, severance and other benefits may lead to spikes in employer costs.

Employer Action Code: Act

The Supreme Court has recently ruled that certain "non-fixed" wage items (i.e., whose payment is subject to specific preconditions) must be considered as part of "ordinary wages" paid to employees. Consequently, other employer payments to employees that are defined in terms of ordinary wages may increase going forward.

Key details

In a ruling released on December 19, 2024, the Supreme Court partially reversed its 2013 decision that a wage item must be paid in a regular, uniform and fixed manner in order to be considered as part of ordinary wages. The new ruling eliminates the requirement that the payment be fixed, meaning that compensation that is paid regularly and uniformly for an employee's regular contractual work, but is subject to preconditions such as continued employment up to the payment date ("payment date requirement") or a minimum number of days worked during the payment period ("service period requirement"), must be considered ordinary wages. According to the court, the new ruling applies prospectively, with the exception of pending lawsuits on the same issue, to which it may apply retroactively.

Employer implications

Some Korean companies have had a long practice of paying a significant part of employees' compensation through regular guaranteed bonuses that have been excluded from ordinary wages, consistent with the court's 2013 ruling. The new broader definition of ordinary wages may increase employer labor costs and liabilities related to payments that are calculated based on ordinary wages, such as overtime, pay in lieu of notice, pay for unused leave and retirement/severance benefits. Employers should consult with their legal counsel on the implications of the ruling and review their compensation policies to ensure

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More