On April 22, 2020, the Second Section of the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice ("STJ") submitted Special Appeals nº 1.843.332/RS, 1.840.531/RS, 1.840.812/RS, 1.842.911/RS and 1,843,382/RS to the system of special appeals dealing with the same matter of law (recursos repetitivo1)-all reported by Minister Villas Bôas Cueva, under the theme 1,051-to define the moment when a credit emerges for the purpose of being subject to the effects of a judicial reorganization proceeding: whether it is the date of the triggering event of the credit or the date that the judicial decision that recognized such credit become final (res judicata).
In a decision rendered on December 9, 2020, the Second Section determined that a credit exists-for the purpose of subjecting it to the effects of a judicial reorganization proceeding-as of the date on which the triggering event took place.
According to the Reporting Justice, the idea that a credit emerges when the judicial decision that recognized such credit become final (res judicata) should not prevail. For him, such understating "starts from the assumption that only in situations in which the obligation is not fulfilled, requiring the intervention of the Judiciary for the provision to be satisfied, is it possible to consider the existence of the credit. However, the credit can be satisfied spontaneously, based on the terms agreed by the parties, extinguishing the obligation. "
In addition, according to the Reporting Justice, this understanding is corroborated by art. 6, Paragraph 3 of Law 11.101/2005 (Brazilian Bankruptcy Code), which allows the Bankruptcy Judge to reserve the estimated amount of the credit before the termination of the lawsuit-for later, once the credit is recognized as unquestionable, to be included in the list of credits in the respective class.
Based on these arguments, the Reporting Justice concluded that subjecting a credit to the effects of a judicial reorganization proceeding does not depend on a judicial declaration or quantification and still less on the res judicata of such decision. For a credit to have to comply with the provisions of the reorganization plan depends on the date of the occurrence of the triggering event. Thus, for example, once a harmful act has occurred, the right of indemnification (a credit) arises.
The Tauil & Chequer and Mayer Brown restructuring team remains available for clarification regarding this decision.
1 The claims are submitted to the system of recursos repetitivos when there are (i) multiple appeals; (ii) based on the same matter of law. The objective is to standardize the treatment of all litigants who are in the same situation.
Visit us at Tauil & Chequer
Founded in 2001, Tauil & Chequer Advogados is a full service law firm with approximately 90 lawyers and offices in Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Vitória. T&C represents local and international businesses on their domestic and cross-border activities and offers clients the full range of legal services including: corporate and M&A; debt and equity capital markets; banking and finance; employment and benefits; environmental; intellectual property; litigation and dispute resolution; restructuring, bankruptcy and insolvency; tax; and real estate. The firm has a particularly strong and longstanding presence in the energy, oil and gas and infrastructure industries as well as with pension and investment funds. In December 2009, T&C entered into an agreement to operate in association with Mayer Brown LLP and become "Tauil & Chequer Advogados in association with Mayer Brown LLP."
© Copyright 2020. Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. All rights reserved.
This article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.