Comparative Guides

Welcome to Mondaq Comparative Guides - your comparative global Q&A guide.

Our Comparative Guides provide an overview of some of the key points of law and practice and allow you to compare regulatory environments and laws across multiple jurisdictions.

Start by selecting your Topic of interest below. Then choose your Regions and finally refine the exact Subjects you are seeking clarity on to view detailed analysis provided by our carefully selected internationally recognised experts.

4. Results: Answers
Alternative Investment Funds
2.
Form and structure
2.1
What types of alternative investment funds are typically found in your jurisdiction?
India

Answer ... The various types of alternative investment funds (AIFs) commonly encountered in India are described in question 1.2.

For more information about this answer please contact: Shivam Gera from Dolce Vita Advisors
2.2
How are these alternative investment funds typically structured?
India

Answer ... In accordance with the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012 (‘AIF Regulations’), the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) allows the establishment of an AIF in the form of:

  • a trust;
  • a limited liability partnership (LLP);
  • a company; or
  • a body corporate.

However, trusts are the prevailing choice for AIF structures due to specific legal, regulatory, tax and commercial considerations.

Structure:

g37618a.jpg

Structure in the International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) Gujarat International Finance Tec City:

Inbound investments (AIFs in IFSC)

g37618b.jpg

  • Offshore shares, debt, derivatives, mutual funds etc
  • Securities listed on IFSC exchange
  • Companies in IFSC
  • Indian shares, debt, derivatives, mutual funds etc
  • Indian listed and unlisted companies
  • Units of AIFs, REITs, InvITs

Outbound investments (AIFs in the IFSC):

g37618c.jpg

  • Offshore shares, debt, derivatives, mutual funds etc
  • Foreign Securities listed on IFSC exchange
  • Companies in IFSC

Under Indian law, a trust does not possess a distinct legal identity and relies on the legal personality of the trustee. Consequently, the trustee has the legal ownership of the trust property, while investors are the beneficial interest holders in the trust. Investment management agreements are formal legal documents that grant investment managers the authority by trustees to oversee and manage capital on behalf of investors.

In contrast, LLPs and companies possess separate legal identities, with investors participating as partners or shareholders in LLPs and companies registered as AIFs, although such arrangements are relatively uncommon.

Certain vehicle types – such as family trusts, employee stock ownership plan trusts, employee welfare trusts, gratuity trusts and securitisation trusts – are excluded from the definition of an AIF.

For more information about this answer please contact: Shivam Gera from Dolce Vita Advisors
2.3
What are the advantages and disadvantages of these different types of structures?
India

Answer ... Company:

Advantages Disadvantages
It possesses a distinct legal identity and perpetual continuity. Establishing a company entails meticulous planning, paperwork and navigating through various stages before formal registration.
The liability of shareholders is limited to their invested capital. Essential components such as the capital structure, constitution, and accounts must be made public through the submission of the necessary documents to the registrar of companies.
It features the separation of ownership and management, with the authority vested in the board of directors. It is subject to more stringent compliance and reporting requirements, leading to increased operational costs. It must also adhere to rigorous accounting and auditing standards.
It is a legal entity that may sue and be sued in its own name. The dissolution process can also be more time-consuming compared to that for trusts.

LLP:

Advantages Disadvantages
It has a separate legal identity and a perpetual existence. Designated partners bear unlimited liability to ensure partnership compliance with applicable laws; and personal assets of partners may be attached in case of fraudulent actions against LLP creditors
Partners enjoy limited liability, which is tied to their capital contributions. Some financial institutions may be restricted from investing in an LLP, limiting capital-raising opportunities.
It is subject to fewer compliance requirements than a company. LLPs with foreign partners may face exchange control limitations on investments in investee companies.
There is no limit on the number of partners, subject to a 1,000-investor restriction imposed by the AIF Regulations; and there is no requirement for a trustee in AIF management. The establishment and dissolution processes can be lengthier than those for trusts.

Trust:

Advantages Disadvantages
It is relatively easy to establish and wind up, providing flexibility in pursuing commercial objectives. A notable disadvantage is the potential imposition of tax at the maximum marginal rate if the trust is structured as a discretionary trust or if the beneficial interests of investors remain uncertain, as seen in hedge funds, particularly for Category III AIFs.
It is subject to fewer statutory disclosure requirements compared to companies or LLPs.
Regulatory compliance under the Trusts Act is minimal, resulting in management cost savings.
Launching multiple schemes under a single trust structure offers a flexibility that may not be as feasible for LLPs and companies.

Each legal structure has its own advantages and disadvantages, making the choice of structure dependent on specific business needs and objectives.

For more information about this answer please contact: Shivam Gera from Dolce Vita Advisors
2.4
What are the most widely used alternative investment funds structures used in your jurisdiction?
India

Answer ... The trust stands out as the pre-eminent AIF structure, driven by its alignment with specific legal, regulatory, tax and commercial considerations.

Of the different categories of AIFs, Category II is favoured due to its flexibility in structuring investment strategies and its sector-agnostic nature. This category accommodates the formation of private equity funds and real estate funds. In India, the Category II AIF is extensively adopted, given its versatility, enabling managers to articulate comprehensive investment policies and objectives for the AIF.

For more information about this answer please contact: Shivam Gera from Dolce Vita Advisors
2.5
Is there a preferred alternative fund structure for particular investment strategies (ie, hedge fund/private credit/private equity)?
India

Answer ... Hedge funds: Hedge funds serve as investment vehicles that draw in private investors and strategically employ a diverse array of trading and investment strategies across domestic and international markets. They actively oversee their portfolios, utilising both long and short positions in traditional securities, alongside holdings in listed and unlisted derivatives.

Category III AIFs exhibit versatility by investing across a spectrum that includes:

  • securities of both listed and unlisted investee companies;
  • derivatives;
  • complex or structured products; and
  • other AIF units.

They can be either open-ended or closed-ended funds, with the latter adhering to a minimum tenure of three years. They are preferred investment strategies for hedge funds and private investment in public equity (PIPE) funds. They employ a wide array of trading strategies and leverage, encompassing investments in both listed and unlisted derivatives. Notably, the government provides no specific incentives or concessions for investments in these funds. Category III AIF funds, focusing on public equities, exhibit lower liquidity risk. Conversely, those engaged in real estate and private equity ventures carry a higher level of risk.

Private credit and private equity: ‘Private credit’ refers to a form of debt financing extended by non-bank lenders or funds that is not publicly issued or traded in open markets. The private credit market has garnered substantial attention from both high-net-worth individuals and institutional investors due to its distinct characteristics and appeal.

Private equity funds serve as investment vehicles created to aggregate capital from institutional investors and high-net-worth individuals. These funds leverage the pooled capital to acquire equity stakes in private companies, strategically aimed at generating significant returns on investment.

Category II funds are specifically designed for private equity, private credit and distressed assets funds. An AIF falling under this category can exclusively invest in securities, encompassing:

  • non-convertible debentures;
  • convertible cumulative debentures;
  • optionally convertible debentures; or
  • other variations of debt securities.

AIFs, including Category II funds, are constrained to investing solely in shares and securities, as outlined in Section 2(h) of the Securities Contracts (Regulations) Act, 1956. An important restriction for AIFs is the prohibition against providing loans. However, this restriction does not apply to special situation funds (SSFs). It is imperative that SSFs adhere to the due diligence requirements mandated by the Reserve Bank of India for their investors.

Specifically, a debt fund registered under Category II primarily focuses on investing in debt or debt securities of both listed and unlisted investee companies in accordance with its stated objectives.

For more information about this answer please contact: Shivam Gera from Dolce Vita Advisors
2.6
Are alternative investment funds required to have a local administrator appointed?
India

Answer ... In India, the establishment of an investment fund necessitates mandatory registration as an AIF, unless the fund qualifies for a specific exemption. SEBI mandates that an AIF must be managed by a fund manager that is established in India. This regulatory requirement ensures that AIFs operating in the Indian market are overseen by managers which are locally based and accountable to the Indian regulatory authorities.

According to the AIF Regulations, a manager appointed by an AIF to oversee its investments can be an individual or an entity based in India. Managers are commonly structured as companies or LLPs. Investments made by an AIF are categorised as investments by residents under exchange control norms, contingent upon both the manager and the sponsor of the AIF being residents owned (with more than 50% ownership) and controlled. Where either the manager or the sponsor does not meet the criteria of being resident-owned or controlled, investments made by the AIF are designated as ‘downstream investments’ or ‘indirect foreign investments’ by the AIF. In such instances, compliance with the Foreign Exchange Management Act becomes mandatory.

In the IFSC, fund management entities have the flexibility to take on various forms, including:

  • companies, trusts, LLPs or branches thereof; or
  • any other form specified by the IFSC Authority.

For more information about this answer please contact: Shivam Gera from Dolce Vita Advisors
2.7
Are alternative investment funds required to appoint a local custodian to hold assets? If yes, what legal protections are in place to protect the alternative investment fund’s assets?
India

Answer ... In India, AIFs must appoint a custodian for the safekeeping of their assets, as per the regulatory framework established by SEBI. The custodian plays a crucial role in ensuring the security and protection of the AIF’s assets.

The sponsor or manager of the AIF must engage a custodian registered with SEBI for the safekeeping of securities if the corpus of the AIF exceeds INR 5 billion. A Category III AIF must appoint a custodian, irrespective of its corpus size. Additionally, in the case of Category III funds dealing with commodity derivatives involving physical settlement, the appointed custodian is responsible for safeguarding the received securities and goods.

Furthermore, for Category I and Category II AIFs engaged in credit default swaps, the sponsor or manager must:

  • appoint a custodian registered with SEBI; and
  • adhere to specific terms and conditions stipulated by SEBI.

Further, in recently published consultation paper, SEBI mandated all AIFs, regardless of corpus, to appoint a custodian.

For more information about this answer please contact: Shivam Gera from Dolce Vita Advisors
2.8
Is it possible for an alternative investment fund to redomicile to your jurisdiction? If yes, what considerations are required and what are the steps involved?
India

Answer ... Regulation 2(1)(q) of the AIF Regulations specifies that a ‘manager’ is an individual or entity appointed by the AIF to oversee its investments. As per SEBI’s practical requirements, the investment manager is expected to be an individual or entity located in India. In situations where foreign managers seek to establish funds domiciled in India, the investment manager may take the form of a subsidiary or a distinct entity set up within India.

Currently, there are no provisions allowing the re-domiciliation of funds into India. An AIF must be established within India, taking the form of a trust, a company or an LLP.

For more information about this answer please contact: Shivam Gera from Dolce Vita Advisors
Contributors
Topic
Alternative Investment Funds