ARTICLE
2 April 2024

Four Years In: How Federal Forum Selection Clauses Have Fared Following Delaware's Landmark Decision In 'Salzberg'

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
Four years ago, in March 2020, the Delaware Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Salzberg v. Sciabacucchi, 227 A.3d 102 (Del. 2020). In it, the court upheld the validity of provisions...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

Four years ago, in March 2020, the Delaware Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Salzberg v. Sciabacucchi, 227 A.3d 102 (Del. 2020). In it, the court upheld the validity of provisions included in a Delaware corporation's certificate of incorporation that require shareholders of that corporation to sue in federal court, rather than state court, over alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act); these claims arise most frequently in the initial public offering (IPO) context. These provisions, referred to as federal forum provisions (FFPs) are essentially contractual provisions between a corporation and its shareholders.

Click here to continue reading...

Originally Published by New York Law Journal, 27 March 2024

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More