ARTICLE
19 September 2017

Deep Dive: Does The PTO's Inter Partes Review Violate The Constitution?

KL
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Contributor

Kramer Levin provides its clients proactive, creative and pragmatic solutions that address today’s most challenging legal issues. The firm is headquartered in New York with offices in Silicon Valley and Washington, DC, and fosters a strong culture of involvement in public and community service. For more information, visit www.kramerlevin.com
"Deep Dive: Does the PTO's Inter Partes Review Violate the Constitution?," an article by Intellectual Property partner Mark A. Baghdassarian, and associates John P. Dillon and Matthew W. Olinzock...
United States Intellectual Property

"Deep Dive: Does the PTO's Inter Partes Review Violate the Constitution?," an article by Intellectual Property partner Mark A. Baghdassarian, and associates John P. Dillon and Matthew W. Olinzock, appeared in the Sept. 6, 2017 issue of the New York Law Journal. The article examines the U.S. Supreme Court's grant of cert. in Oil States vs. Greene's Energy, to evaluate whether inter partes reviews violate the Constitution by extinguishing property rights through a non-Article III forum without a jury.

Read the full article here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More