ARTICLE
25 June 2021

Judge Albright's Latest Changes To Case Management And Discovery Hearings

WT
Winston Taylor

Contributor

Whether you're leading the way, disrupting an industry, entering a new phase of growth, or launching a defining product—we're in the room with you. In the action. Sleeves rolled up.

With a rich history spanning both sides of the Atlantic, we are present in the major commercial centers that matter to our clients: the U.S., the U.K., Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. Combining scale with the speed clients demand, our defining capabilities include major litigation, critical transactions, strategic IP, and private wealth.

Our team of over 1,400 lawyers works hand-in-hand across markets, sectors, practice areas, and client teams. All-in problem solvers, we bring the creativity to think differently, and the pragmatism to get things done when it counts the most.

Embedded in your business and sharing your ambition, we take the work personally. Shaping what we do and how we do it around your goals and needs, always one step ahead of the moment.

Judge Albright issued two new standing orders on June 16 and 17, 2021, which are now published on the Western District of Texas website...
United States Intellectual Property

Judge Albright issued two new standing orders on June 16 and 17, 2021, which are now published on the Western District of Texas website  here and  here.

Here are the highlights:

Proposed Orders After Discovery Hearings: Judge Albright now requires the prevailing party in discovery hearings to submit an agreed proposed order to the Court within 7 days of the ruling. The agreed proposed order should include a brief summary of the nature of the dispute and the parties' understanding of the Court's ruling. The parties may submit competing proposed orders if they cannot agree.

Case Management and Notice of Readiness for Patent Cases: Judge Albright amended his prior standing order regarding notice of readiness for patent cases. With the changes to the timeline, the parties will not be waiting on information from the Court before  the OGP deadlines can take effect. The new order lays out the following timeline after the filing of the Case Readiness Status Report:

  • The CMC is deemed to occur 14 days after the filing date of the CRSR (or the last CRSR if there are related cases).
  • The Court will schedule one Markman hearing 23 weeks after the CMC, and the hearing date should be included in the proposed scheduling order.

The new order also defines "CRSR Related Cases" as cases "filed within thirty (30) days after the first case is filed" and "shar[ing] at least one common asserted patent."

In addition, for any pre-Markman issues, the parties should email the Court a joint submission of their respective positions after filing the CRSR so the Court can determine whether to hold a telephonic hearing.

Co-authored by Marisa Thompson, a summer associate in the firm's Dallas office.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More