ARTICLE
6 April 2021

Hedonic Regression — The Theory Behind The $2.2B Verdict In The VLSI Technologies v. Intel Case

WS
Winston & Strawn LLP

Contributor

Winston & Strawn LLP is an international law firm with 15 offices located throughout North America, Asia, and Europe. More information about the firm is available at www.winston.com.
Winston's Michael Tomasulo and economist and damages expert Dr. Alan Cox unpack VLSI's use of hedonic regression, which was used to support its $2.2B damages claim in the VLSI v. Intel patent ...
United States Intellectual Property

Listen to Audio

1054794a.jpg

Winston's Michael Tomasulo and economist and damages expert Dr. Alan Cox unpack VLSI's use of hedonic regression, which was used to support its $2.2B damages claim in the VLSI v. Intel patent jury trial. Michael Tomasulo and Dr. Cox review hedonic regressions, discuss how they have been used in antitrust cases, how VLSI used them to determine patent damages, and how the verdict might be attacked by Intel.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More