ARTICLE
17 September 2014

CFTC Staff Issues No-Action Letter For Commodity Pool Operators Of Certain Commodity Pools

AO
A&O Shearman

Contributor

A&O Shearman was formed in 2024 via the merger of two historic firms, Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling. With nearly 4,000 lawyers globally, we are equally fluent in English law, U.S. law and the laws of the world’s most dynamic markets. This combination creates a new kind of law firm, one built to achieve unparalleled outcomes for our clients on their most complex, multijurisdictional matters – everywhere in the world. A firm that advises at the forefront of the forces changing the current of global business and that is unrivalled in its global strength. Our clients benefit from the collective experience of teams who work with many of the world’s most influential companies and institutions, and have a history of precedent-setting innovations. Together our lawyers advise more than a third of NYSE-listed businesses, a fifth of the NASDAQ and a notable proportion of the London Stock Exchange, the Euronext, Euronext Paris and the Tokyo and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges.
On September 3, 2014, the CFTC’s Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight issued a no-action letter for commodity pool operators.
United States Finance and Banking

On September 3, 2014, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission's ("CFTC") Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight ("DSIO") issued a no-action letter for commodity pool operators ("CPOs") of certain commodity pools that are non-registered investment companies ("Parent Pools") and that use wholly-owned trading subsidiaries to trade commodity interests ("Trading Subsidiaries"). In cases where CPOs do not provide a separate annual report for a Parent Pool's Trading Subsidiary to the National Futures Association ("NFA") (pursuant to CFTC regulation 4.7(b) or 4.22(c), as applicable) or a separate CPO-PQR report for a Parent Pool's Trading Subsidiary to NFA (pursuant to CFTC regulation 4.27(c)), the DSIO recommends that the CFTC not take an enforcement action so long as (i) the CPO of the Parent Pool is the CPO of the Trading Subsidiary; (ii) the exposure to the Trading Subsidiary by the participants in its Parent Pool is being shared pro rata; (iii) the CPO is consolidating the reports for the Trading Subsidiary with those of its Parent Pool; and (iv) the CPO is claiming the relief through notice.

The full CFTC staff letter is available at: http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@lrlettergeneral/documents/letter/14-112.pdf.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More