Mining Laws And Regulations United Kingdom 2026

Article Insights

1. Relevant Authorities and Legislation

1.1 What regulates mining law?

Regulation of the mining industry follows the devolution of certain powers relating to mining from the government of the United Kingdom to the governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. As such, some law applies to the whole of the UK, while some applies only to a particular part of the UK.

The principal sources of law in the UK are Acts of Parliament and associated statutory instruments, common law (essentially case law), and retained EU legislation. Mineral leases, planning consents and environmental consents will also contain terms and conditions with which mine operators need to comply, and many of these will be tailored to the particular project and the nature and location of the operations, imposing, for example, restrictions on traffic movements, limits on air and noise emissions, and the need to decontaminate and restore the site after closure.

The UK regulatory regime for mining also varies according to the mineral in question.

1.2 Which Government body/ies administer the mining industry?

The government, and to some extent local authorities, set the policy framework within which the mining industry operates. The general position under the law of property is that landowners own the minerals beneath their land and are able to license the right to exploit them to third parties. However, in some cases, all rights to search for and exploit minerals have been reserved for the Crown; for example, all naturally occurring gold and silver (historically referred to as Mines Royal) vest with the Crown, as well as oil and gas, and all minerals occurring on and beneath the seabed within 200 nautical miles of the coast. Licensing of exploration and exploitation of these minerals is either conducted on behalf of the Crown or by governmental bodies established for this purpose.

The ownership of the majority of unworked coal and coal mines in the UK (excluding Northern Ireland) belongs to the Coal Authority. The Coal Authority, established under the Coal Industry Act 1994, is an executive, non-departmental public body whose responsibilities include, amongst others, the licensing of coal mining operations, the administering of coal mining subsidence damage claims, and bearing the liability for contaminated mine water caused by historic coal workings. The Coal Authority sometimes owns non-coal mines and minerals in coal mining areas.

The exploitation of gold and silver is overseen by the Crown Estate and, in Scotland, the Crown Estate Scotland (together, TCE, established through the Crown Estate Acts of 1956 and 1961) through Wardell Armstrong, the Crown Estate Mineral Agent. TCE also manages the seabed to the 12-nautical-mile territorial limit and other rights including non-energy mineral rights out to 200 nautical miles in all parts of the UK. In this capacity, TCE grants licences for the extraction of marine sand and gravel resources from the seabed, as well as such minerals as salt, potash and polyhalite occurring beneath the seabed.

The North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) (formerly called the Oil and Gas Authority), a state-owned company limited by shares, was formally established as an independent regulator under the Energy Act 2016 and is responsible for the licensing of offshore and onshore oil and gas operations in the UK, including exploration, production, decommissioning and abandonment.

In Northern Ireland, the Mineral Development Act (Northern Ireland) 1969 vested most minerals in Northern Ireland in the Department of the Economy. This enables the government of Northern Ireland to grant exploration and production licences in its own name. The main exceptions to this right are: (a) offshore oil and gas deposits, which are administered by the NSTA; (b) gold and silver, which vest in the Crown; (c) “common” substances (including aggregates, sand and gravel); and (d) minerals that were being worked at the time of the 1969 Act.

As well as a licence to exploit minerals, planning consent is required to authorise any development works from the local mineral planning authority (MPA).

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE), formed in 1975, enforces health and safety regulation in England, Wales and Scotland, together with local authorities and other authorised bodies. In Northern Ireland, health and safety regulation is enforced by the Health and Safety Executive for Northern Ireland.

Environmental regulation is undertaken by the national environmental regulators and, in some respects, the local authorities. The principal environmental regulator for England (and in some subject areas across the UK nations) is the Environment Agency (EA), formed under the Environment Act 1995; for devolved matters in Scotland it is the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA), formed under the Environment Act 1995; in Wales it is Natural Resources Wales (NRW) (established in 2013); and in Northern Ireland it is the Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA), which has been established as an executive agency within the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs since 2016. Natural England additionally issues licences under the wildlife and habitats conservation regime, as well as providing specialist input to other bodies.

The Office for Environmental Protection (OEP), formed under the Environment Act 2021, is responsible for holding public authorities and governmental entities to account for the implementation of environmental policies in the UK by reference to legally binding targets. Amongst other powers, it has the ability to issue a decision notice setting out the remedial steps that such authority or entity should take, and to apply to the High Court for an environmental review, in each case, where there has been a failure by a public authority to comply with environmental law and that breach is considered to be serious. Furthermore, the recent regulations introduced under the Environment Act 2021 on 24 January 2022, amongst other things, require public authorities and governmental entities to co-operate with the OEP and to provide it with any reasonable assistance it requests. Such regulations also provide for OEP monitoring and reporting functions in relation to environmental plans, targets, and laws, and bolster the enforcement powers and other functions available to the OEP to manage failures by public authorities to comply with environmental law.

1.3 Describe any other sources of law affecting the mining industry.

The principal legislation affecting the mining industry in the UK includes the following:

1. The Coal Industry Act 1994, establishing the Coal Authority and setting out the framework within which the coal industry currently operates.
2. The Mines and Quarries Act 1954, governing the management and control of mines and quarries.
3. The Mines Regulations 2014, establishing mine-specific health and safety regulations that are centred around major hazards within the underground mining sector, as amended post-Brexit by the Carcinogens and Mutagens (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2020, which adjust the occupational exposure limit values for certain hazardous substances that may be found in the workplace.
4. The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and a large body of health and safety regulations of general application across all sectors, which includes the:
   1. Explosives Regulations 2014;
   2. Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002;
   3. Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002; and
   4. Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998.
5. The Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016 and equivalents in the devolved regions.
6. The Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

As a result of section 3 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (as amended by the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020, the majority of the directly applicable EU mining regulations remain in force after the UK's exit from the EU on 31 January 2020 as retained EU legislation that forms part of UK domestic law. In addition, new domestic legislation, such as the Environment Act 2021, has been introduced to improve air and water quality, tackle waste, increase recycling, halt the decline of species, and improve our natural environment.

2. Recent Political Developments

2.1 Are there any recent political developments affecting the mining industry?

Labour government and a change in strategy

Following the UK general election on 4 July 2024, a Labour government was elected on a platform focused heavily on energy reform and environmental policy. Now in office for over a year, Labour has begun implementing its clean energy agenda. The government has reaffirmed its ambitious targets to double onshore wind, triple solar, and quadruple offshore wind capacity by 2030, and has committed to investing in carbon capture, hydrogen, marine energy, and new nuclear projects.

One of Labour's earliest actions in power was lifting the ban on new onshore wind farms in England – a restriction previously imposed by the Conservative government. The government has also made progress towards establishing Great British Energy, a publicly owned energy investment company designed to co-invest in clean power technologies and help finance capital-intensive renewable projects.

Great British Energy is expected to be funded through an expanded windfall tax on oil and gas companies, signalling Labour's firm policy direction: transitioning away from fossil fuels and towards long-term investment in green energy infrastructure.

In addition, Labour has maintained its pledge not to grant any new oil, gas, or coal mining licences, and to introduce a permanent ban on fracking. Unless geopolitical events force a significant shift in policy, the UK's energy and mining strategy will remain focused on decarbonisation and green energy development in the years to come.

No new oil, gas, or coal mining licences

Labour's stance has clear implications for the coal and oil and gas sectors, which now face tighter regulatory and licensing constraints. The party's manifesto commitment not to issue new fossil fuel extraction licences is now UK government policy, though the implementation process has brought legal and procedural challenges.

In the case of offshore oil and gas, Labour came into power during an active licensing round led by the NSTA. Since then, the government has had to consider whether to cancel or allow the round to conclude, weighing potential legal risks (from oil and gas companies who have invested significantly in the process) against the political cost of undermining a core campaign pledge. As of mid-2025, no final resolution has been announced, and the situation remains under review.

Regarding coal mining, a key development has been the government's recent withdrawal of its legal defence in the judicial review concerning the Woodhouse Colliery. The deep coal mine, approved in 2022 under the Conservative government, was intended to produce over 3 million tonnes of coal annually until 2049. Labour's position appears to reflect its commitment to winding down coal use in the UK, although it faces ongoing challenges in reconciling these policies with regional employment impacts.

A major short- to long-term issue facing the government is the redeployment of workers from fossil fuel industries. Labour has proposed re-training and transitioning these workers into green industries, but, in practice, the scale and logistics of such workforce redeployment remain complex and politically sensitive. The government will need to address this challenge more directly as its energy transition policies accelerate.

Energy and critical mineral independence

In recent years, events such as Brexit, Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and rising tensions in the Taiwan Strait have brought the UK's dependence on imported energy and critical minerals into sharp focus. Minerals like lithium, cobalt, copper, graphite, tin, and silicon are essential to technologies ranging from smartphones to electric vehicles and renewable energy systems.

Demand is expected to continue to increase. The UK government has estimated that, globally, the world will need four times more critical minerals by 2040 than it does today to meet climate and energy targets. In response, UK policymakers are increasingly treating mineral supply resilience as a national priority.

In January 2024, the government published its first Critical Imports and Supply Chains Strategy, establishing the UK Critical Minerals Intelligence Centre to support secure and sustainable mineral supply chains for domestic industries. Since then, the UK has signalled that it may amend the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (NSIA) to formally include critical minerals as a sensitive sector. If implemented, this would enable the government to intervene in foreign takeovers of UK-based mineral companies on national security grounds.

China and Taiwan

As of 2025, escalating tensions between China and Taiwan remain one of the most significant geopolitical risks to the global supply of critical minerals. China is currently the world's leading producer of over 20 metals and minerals, including aluminium, zinc, rare earth elements, and many materials vital to clean energy technologies.

Conflict in the region and the imposition of any sanctions could disrupt global supply chains and dramatically increase prices for critical minerals. The UK Parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee previously warned of this risk in its December 2023 report, A rock and a hard place: building critical mineral resilience. The report emphasised that critical mineral supply is not a geological challenge, but a geopolitical one, noting that many key mineral reserves and processing facilities are located in autocratic or adversarial nations, with China dominating global processing capacity.

Should the geopolitical climate deteriorate, the UK may be compelled to rapidly develop domestic mining capabilities or deepen alliances with other mineral-rich democracies to secure its supply. Either way, any cooling of relations with China will have direct consequences for UK mining strategy and industrial resilience.

2.2 Are there any specific steps the mining industry is taking in light of these developments?

Critical minerals industry

Despite Labour's clear pivot away from coal and oil and gas mining, the UK government and industry stakeholders are actively pursuing opportunities to develop the domestic critical minerals sector wherever geologically and economically feasible.

The government's UK Critical Minerals Strategy, published in early 2024, sets as its primary objective the acceleration of domestic exploration and extraction capabilities to maximise the UK's own mineral resources. This approach seeks to reduce dependency on foreign imports and bolster supply chain resilience for essential minerals used in clean energy technologies and advanced manufacturing.

One of the flagship initiatives within the UK's emerging critical minerals industry is the development of low-carbon lithium extraction in Cornwall. In 2023, Cornish Lithium, a UK-based mineral exploration company, secured approximately £53 million in funding, led by the UK Infrastructure Bank, to develop a pioneering geothermal lithium extraction project. This project aims to combine geothermal energy production with lithium extraction from geothermal brines, providing a sustainable and low-carbon method of lithium supply crucial for batteries and electric vehicles.

Supporting these industrial efforts, the British Geological Survey (BGS) published the UK's first comprehensive Critical Mineral Map in April 2023. This mapping exercise identified promising regions for further exploration and resource development, notably:

• North-west Wales.
• Pembrokeshire.
• South-west England.

These areas are now the focus of increased geological surveys, mineral exploration licences, and government-backed research projects aimed at better understanding the resource potential and enabling future commercial extraction.

Additional industry and government actions

In addition to direct mineral exploration and development, other steps being taken include:

• Establishment of the UK Critical Minerals Intelligence Centre, which continues to provide data, risk analysis, and guidance to support industry decision-making and policy development.
• Efforts to foster public-private partnerships and co-investment vehicles – similar to the energy sector's Great British Energy – to pool capital for large-scale mineral extraction and processing projects.
• Initiatives aimed at skills development and workforce transition, anticipating that new mining projects will require a specialist labour force trained in modern, environmentally sustainable mining techniques.
• Increased collaboration with international partners to diversify mineral supply chains, secure technology transfers, and develop joint ventures, particularly in countries with stable governance and rich mineral deposits.

3. Mechanics of Acquisition of Rights

3.1 What rights are required to conduct reconnaissance?

Please refer to question 3.2 below.

3.2 What rights are required to conduct exploration?

The rights needed for reconnaissance and exploration depend on the type of mineral being explored and the mineral's ownership. In the UK, most minerals are privately owned unless specifically reserved for the Crown or a public authority. These reserved minerals include:

• Coal.
• Gold.
• Silver.
• Mineral resources on and beneath the seabed within 200 nautical miles of the coast.

For these Crown-owned or state-controlled minerals, the licensing requirements and processes are set by the relevant government authority or public body, which will apply to all prospective licensees in a uniform manner. The process typically concludes with the decision to either grant or refuse an option, lease, or licence, often with conditions that the licensee must meet during the licence period.

Specific examples include:

• Coal: Licensing procedures are managed by the Coal Authority, which provides standardised terms for coal mining operations.
• Oil and Gas: The NSTA oversees exploration, production, and decommissioning licensing, with standardised terms available through their website.

In contrast, for privately owned minerals, the terms under which exploration rights can be exercised are determined directly between the landowner and the licensee. These terms are generally not subject to country-wide regulations (except for health and safety and environmental requirements), providing more flexibility for negotiation but also variability in agreements.

Access to land and exploration rights

Holding a licence to conduct exploration or reconnaissance does not automatically grant the right to access the land where the minerals are located. Land access must be secured directly from the landowner. Typically, this access is provided through a lease agreement, but in rare cases, the freehold title to the land may be acquired.

Planning permissions and Environmental Impact Assessments

Exploration works, unless classified as permitted development, generally require planning permission. This permission is obtained from the local MPA and may include stipulations such as conducting an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The EIA is often a key component in assessing the potential environmental impact of the proposed exploration activities.

In some instances, an exploration licence may be conditional on the licensee obtaining the necessary planning permission from the MPA.

Environmental permits

Alongside planning permissions, operators may also be required to secure one or more environmental permits from the relevant environmental regulator. Depending on the location and scale of the project, this could involve several regulatory bodies:

• EA (England).
• SEPA.
• NRW.
• NIEA.

These permits ensure that exploration activities comply with environmental laws and regulations, including water management, waste disposal, and habitat protection.

3.3 What rights are required to conduct mining?

Different procedures apply to the exploration and extraction of different minerals and can also vary depending on the type of land and whether the operations are onshore or offshore.

Publicly owned minerals

For publicly owned minerals, such as coal, gold, silver, and minerals beneath the seabed within 200 nautical miles of the UK's coast, the procedures for exploration and extraction are governed by the relevant government agency or public body. These agencies include:

• The Coal Authority for coal.
• The Crown Estate for gold, silver, and minerals on and beneath the seabed.
• The NSTA for offshore oil, gas, and seabed minerals.

The procedures for obtaining exploration and extraction rights for these minerals will differ depending on the specific mineral and its location (onshore or offshore). For example:

• Coal mining procedures are highly regulated by the Coal Authority, which ensures compliance with both historical regulations and modern environmental and safety standards.
• Offshore mining (such as oil, gas, or seabed minerals) requires a different regulatory framework and is often subject to specific licensing and operational standards administered by the NSTA.

Even for the same type of mineral, the regulations and procedures differ significantly depending on whether the operation is on land or in marine environments.

Privately owned minerals

For privately owned minerals, the procedures for obtaining exploration and extraction rights are not standardised across the UK. Instead, they are negotiated directly between the miner and the landowner. The terms of these agreements may vary widely, depending on factors such as:

• The mineral in question.
• The landowner's preferences.
• The scale of the operation.
• Local environmental concerns.

While there are no specific procedural requirements for privately owned minerals, health and safety, environmental protection, and planning laws still apply. Private operators must adhere to these laws regardless of the ownership of the mineral.

Onshore vs offshore operations

The distinction between onshore and offshore mining operations also plays a crucial role in determining the procedure:

• Onshore mining typically follows more traditional land-based regulatory frameworks, where permissions are granted by local MPAs and environmental permits are issued by relevant national agencies such as the EA, SEPA, or NRW.
• Offshore mining, however, is subject to more complex regulations, as the UK government and the Crown Estate have jurisdiction over the seabed and marine minerals, including the process for granting extraction rights. This often involves coordination with multiple governmental bodies and additional considerations such as marine conservation and EIAs.

Health, safety, and environmental regulations

Regardless of whether the mineral is privately or publicly owned, all extractive operations must comply with:

• Health and safety regulations (e.g., the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, Mines Regulations 2014).
• Environmental protection laws, including the need for EIAs and ongoing compliance with environmental permits.
• Planning laws: All exploration and extraction operations must be approved by the local MPA where necessary.

These regulations ensure that mining activities are conducted in a way that prioritises public safety, environmental protection, and sustainable resource management.

3.4 Are different procedures applicable to different minerals and on different types of land?

Different procedures, as established and enforced by the relevant government agency or other public body, will apply to different publicly owned minerals, including coal, gold and silver. Even when dealing with the same mineral, the procedure may also vary depending on whether the licence is sought for onshore or offshore operations.

Privately owned minerals will be accessed on the terms agreed with the relevant landowners and are not subject to any specific procedural requirements. Regardless of the ownership of the mineral in question, all extractive companies must, however, comply with all applicable laws concerning health and safety, environmental protection and planning when conducting their operations.

3.5 Are different procedures applicable to natural oil and gas?

The regulatory regime applicable to oil and gas exploration and production in the UK (with the exception of the onshore territory of Northern Ireland) and on the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) is set out in the Petroleum Act 1998. Under the Petroleum Act, all rights to petroleum, including the rights to “search and bore for, and get” petroleum, are vested in the Crown. Any exploration or production of petroleum therefore requires a licence from the NSTA. A separate regime applies to onshore oil and gas in Northern Ireland, established under the powers devolved to the Northern Ireland Assembly.

The NSTA issues production licences through competitive licensing rounds. A requirement for offshore licences is that the bidder must promise to maximise the economic recovery of the UK's oil and gas resources. The NSTA can only accept licence applications in respect of a formal invitation to apply. The process will usually start with publication of the invitation in the London, Edinburgh and Belfast Gazettes, with applications only being submitted at least 90 days later. There may be exceptional circumstances where it would be reasonable for a company not to have to wait for the next licensing round to obtain a licence, so the NSTA also has an out-of-round application process. It can only be used if justified by exceptional circumstances and is not a routine alternative to licensing rounds.

Petroleum licences can be held by a single company or by several companies working together, though in legal terms there is only ever a single licensee; however, it may comprise many companies. All companies on a licence share joint and several liability for obligations and liabilities that arise under it. Each licence takes the form of a deed, which binds the licensee to obey the licence conditions, regardless of whether or not it is using the licence at any given moment.

Additional requirements apply to onshore high-volume hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) operations. In particular, operators are required to undertake detailed geological studies and submit a Hydraulic Fracture Plan (HFP) to the NSTA (and also the EA) setting out how they propose to control and monitor the fracturing process and assess the risk of induced seismic activity. The HFP must then be approved independently by both regulators, with the HSE having had the opportunity to comment. Consent from the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) will also be required to commence hydraulic fracturing operations.

As noted in the 2024 Labour government policy, the UK government under Labour has pledged not to grant any new oil and gas licences. This includes licences for fracking and other forms of onshore exploration. The government's stance is to move away from fossil fuels and shift towards cleaner energy alternatives.

4. Foreign Ownership and Indigenous Ownership Requirements and Restrictions

4.1 What types of entity can own reconnaissance, exploration and mining rights?

There are no formal requirements as to the type of entity that can be granted reconnaissance, exploration and mining rights.

4.2 Can the entity owning the rights be a foreign entity or owned (directly or indirectly) by a foreign entity and are there special rules for foreign applicants?

Presently, there are no general restrictions on foreign investment in the mining sector (for regulation of foreign direct investment (FDI) on an economy-wide basis, please refer to the NSIA and the 2020 amendments to the Enterprise Act 2002, which expanded the UK's FDI screening controls to include businesses responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, with the consequence that more foreign investments will be subject to review). Applicable licensing requirements will, however, need to be studied for applicants' residency criteria, which may, for example, require that the applicant is registered as a UK company, has a branch of a foreign company registered at Companies House (which is the registrar for companies in the UK) or has a staffed presence in the UK.

4.3 Are there any change of control restrictions applicable?

Whether there are any restrictions applicable to a change of control will be determined under the terms of the licence itself. For example, the model clauses for coal licences issued by the Coal Authority require the licensee to notify the Coal Authority of any change of control of the licensee. Such notification will contain the details of the financial standing and controlling persons of the intended transferee, the experience and expertise of the transferee and its controlling persons, as well as the proposals of the transferee with regard to the carrying out of future coal mining operations within the licensed area. On receipt of the notification, the Coal Authority may impose such conditions as it thinks fit to ensure that the terms of the licence will be complied with.

If certain turnover/share-of-supply thresholds are exceeded, the acquisition of a mining company will be caught by the UK's general merger control regime and may be reviewed by the UK's Competition and Markets Authority, which has, in the wake of Brexit, inherited the European Commission's role in investigating mergers that may impact the UK's national interest, whereas previously it could not assume cases already under EU review. If the proposed acquisition raises any national security concerns, a national security assessment may also be undertaken at this stage. Please note question 2.1 above, in the context of the proposal to include “Critical Minerals” as a new sub-section of the NSIA Regulations.

4.4 Are there requirements for ownership by indigenous persons or entities?

There are no indigenous ownership entitlements in the UK.

4.5 Does the State have free carry rights or options to acquire shareholdings?

The government does not have free carry rights or options to acquire equity interests in mining projects.

5. Processing, Refining, Beneficiation and Export

5.1 Are there special regulatory provisions relating to processing, refining and further beneficiation of mined minerals?

Beneficiation of mined minerals must comply with all applicable environmental and health and safety requirements (see sections 9 and 11 for more detail), including restrictions on the manufacture and use of certain dangerous substances, such as asbestos.

5.2 Are there restrictions on the export of minerals and levies payable in respect thereof?

Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH) regimes apply to chemical substances manufactured or imported in the EU and UK. An important exemption allows producers to avoid registration provisions under REACH, provided that the minerals, ores, ore concentrates, raw and processed natural gas, crude oil and coal that they produce occur in nature and are not chemically modified. Otherwise, registration is mandatory in order to place any of the above on the EU or UK market.

Following Brexit, the EU REACH framework no longer applies to the UK (except in Northern Ireland) and has been replaced by a UK REACH regime. The intention is that the UK REACH regime mirrors the EU system as closely as possible, maintaining existing standards of health and environmental protection, and substance production. For UK-based operations supplying to the UK only, the process is straightforward as permits granted under EU REACH have been “carried over” to the new regime and simply need to be confirmed by the permit holder on the UK REACH IT system. However, to continue to export or import substances subject to REACH, both UK-based companies and their EU/EEA area-based counterparts are likely to need to comply with both EU and UK regulations when trading together.

In the unlikely scenario that the item is listed on the UK Strategic Export Controls List (e.g., as a dual-use item that can be used for both civilian and military applications), an export licence will be required, which will be issued by the Export Control Joint Unit.

There are no export levies due to the government. Levies payable in third countries will depend on the destination country, the type of goods, and their origin and value.

6. Transfer and Encumbrance

6.1 Are there restrictions on the transfer of rights to conduct reconnaissance, exploration and mining?

For publicly owned mineral resources, there will generally be a formal process to arrange for the licence to be transferred or assigned to another entity, in full or in part, administered by the competent government authority or other public body.

Where the rights to conduct reconnaissance, exploration or mining were granted by a private landowner, the terms on which such rights were granted will need to be consulted for any restrictions on their assignment.

6.2 Are the rights to conduct reconnaissance, exploration and mining capable of being mortgaged or otherwise secured to raise finance?

Under the Law of Property Act 1925, the definition of “land” includes mines and minerals on or under the land. This means that an interest in mines and minerals can be mortgaged or otherwise secured to raise finance (subject to any restrictions conferred by the right on which such interest is held).

The interest in mines and minerals should, however, be distinguished from the rights to conduct reconnaissance, exploration and mining works, which generally take the form of a licence. The ability to use the latter as security will depend on the terms of the instrument conferring such rights.

7. Dealing in Rights by Means of Transferring Subdivisions, Ceding Undivided Shares and Mining of Mixed Minerals

7.1 Are rights to conduct reconnaissance, exploration and mining capable of being subdivided?

There are no specific rules relating to subdivision of the rights to conduct reconnaissance, exploration and mining. However, a licensee will often be able to transfer (by way of sale or assignment) a part of the licence to another person, with the licensor's consent. In such cases, it will be important to establish the liability regime as between the old and the new licensees and whether they would be jointly and severally liable for any violation of the terms of the licence.

Any transfer of a licence (or any part thereof) will also raise questions concerning the continued use of: (i) the land where the relevant operations are being conducted; and (ii) the permits obtained prior to transfer, which will need to be addressed with the relevant third parties.

7.2 Are rights to conduct reconnaissance, exploration and mining capable of being held in undivided shares?

This will depend on the licence sought. For example, licences issued by the Coal Authority can be held by a single company or by several working together. Importantly, all companies named on such licence will share joint and several liability for obligations and liabilities that arise under it.

7.3 Is the holder of rights to explore for or mine a primary mineral entitled to explore for or mine secondary minerals?

There is no presumption that the holder of rights to explore for or mine a primary mineral will be entitled to the same in respect of secondary minerals found in the same area. Unless specifically included in the terms of the original licence (which is not common), a separate grant from the owner of the secondary mineral (whether private or public) will therefore need to be sought. For example, holders of coal licences can obtain further licences from the Coal Authority for adjacent activities such as coal bed methane extraction, abandoned mine methane extraction, mine water heat recovery and deep energy exploitation.

7.4 Is the holder of a right to conduct reconnaissance, exploration and mining entitled also to exercise rights over residue deposits on the land concerned?

Similarly, the holder of a right to conduct reconnaissance, exploration and mining will not be automatically entitled to exercise these rights over any residue deposit and other residue stockpiles. While such rights can, in principle, be provided in the terms of a licence, this is not common.

7.5 Are there any special rules relating to offshore exploration and mining?

Offshore operations in UK territorial waters and on the UKCS are subject to additional requirements with a view to preserving the marine environment.

Oil and gas operators are required to submit and implement a “safety case” document to the NSTA in accordance with the requirements of UK regulations for offshore installations and wells.

TCE is the body responsible for licensing the extraction of marine sand and gravel resources that are widely used in construction projects, as well as for coastal protection and land reclamation, whereas coal deposits are managed by the Coal Authority (both onshore and offshore).

8. Rights to Use Surface of Land

8.1 Does the holder of a right to conduct reconnaissance, exploration or mining automatically own the right to use the surface of land?

The right to use the surface of land is to be distinguished from the right to conduct reconnaissance, exploration or mining, and will need to be applied for separately. This can be particularly cumbersome on the prospective licensee where the landowner is not the same as the government authority or other public body that granted the licence.

As an exception, holders of licences to conduct high-volume hydraulic fracturing do have a statutory right under the Petroleum Act 1998 to access reserves located deep under neighbouring land over which the licensee does not have a private right of access. In other cases, attempts to access without landowner permission will constitute a trespass and may lead to court action for damages and/or an injunction.

8.2 What obligations does the holder of a reconnaissance right, exploration right or mining right have vis-à-vis the landowner or lawful occupier?

The lease or other document pursuant to which the licensee was granted access to the land will specify the obligations owed to the landowner as agreed between the parties. These obligations will typically include the payment of rent or royalties, the obligation to ensure adequate support for the surface and make good any damage caused to the surface, and others.

General principles of the law of nuisance will also apply to the use of land as a mine or quarry. Examples of mining activities capable of creating a nuisance include the emission of dust or noxious fumes, the discharge of polluting effluents into a river, the creation of noise and vibration, and the projection of debris by blasting. Affected landowners may in these circumstances bring a claim for an injunction and, in some cases, damages against the mine operator. Complaints of noise and dust emissions may also cause the relevant environmental regulator to investigate whether permit conditions have been breached.

The emission of smoke or fumes and the lack of proper fencing of abandoned and disused mines and quarries are, in certain circumstances, a statutory nuisance in relation to which the local authority may issue an abatement notice requiring the nuisance to cease. If the impacts of the nuisance affect several people in the vicinity, the nuisance may also constitute a public nuisance.

8.3 What rights of expropriation exist?

It is possible for land, and the rights for mining and extraction, to be obtained using compulsory acquisition. In each case, landowners whose land has been acquired, or who have suffered as a result of the acquisition, may be entitled to be paid compensation, as assessed by a specialist tribunal.

In England and Wales, rights over land (but not freehold interests) can be acquired under the Mines (Working Facilities and Support) Act 1966. To do so, an application must be submitted to the government, which in turn will instigate proceedings in the High Court. The court will not grant rights under the 1966 Act unless it can be proven that to do so would be “expedient in the national interest”.

The Opencast Coal Act 1958 grants the Coal Authority the power to compulsorily purchase the temporary right to land containing mineral deposits, although it has been rare for it to do so. Under the Acquisition of Land Act 1981, it is possible for a Compulsory Purchase Order to include provision for the digging and carrying away of minerals by statutory undertakers, where this is necessary for construction work.

Planning permission must be obtained from the local planning authority before mining activity is commenced. If permission is refused and mining activity has already taken place, a claim can be made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 revocation provisions for such activity to cease. Any losses incurred as a result of stopping the mining activity may be recovered by making a claim to the local planning authority under said Act.

9. Environmental and Social

9.1 What environmental authorisations are required in order to conduct reconnaissance, exploration and mining operations?

Onshore, a number of activities carried out as part of mining operations require an environmental permit. The Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016 require a permit to crush, grind or reduce minerals, except for the cutting of stone, or the grading, screening or heating of clay, sand or any other naturally occurring mineral other than coal, or where it is unlikely to result in the release of particulate matter into the air or underground. A permit will also be required to discharge any pollutants to the water environment, manage radioactive materials, operate combustion facilities or discharge groundwater and, importantly, an environmental permit for a mining waste operation will be required in order to manage extractive waste, as outlined in question 9.2 below.

These permits cover emissions to the air and water, energy efficiency, and the need to have in place proper environmental management systems. Permits are only awarded to applicants who can satisfy the regulator that they are a suitable person to hold and comply with the ongoing requirements of such a licence. There are annual subsistence fees, and the environmental regulator will conduct inspections and has powers to prosecute or take a range of other actions for breach, which in some cases involves the right to suspend operations and/or revoke a permit.

Conservation legislation protects certain species and habitats, which a mine may need a licence in order to disturb. This legislation includes the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (which consolidated and updated the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010), the Protection of Badgers Act 1992 and the Offshore Marine Conservation (Natural Habitats, & c.) Regulations 2017 (which consolidated and updated the Offshore Marine Conservation (Natural Habitats, & c.) Regulations 2007).

Abstraction of surface and/or groundwater, including as part of dewatering the mine, will require an abstraction licence under the Water Resources Act 1991. Separate consents must be obtained from the local sewerage undertaker for liquid effluents disposed of into the sewage network. Additionally, following the UK's exit from the EU on 31 January 2020, the government launched the UK Emissions Trading Scheme to support the UK's 2050 goal of carbon neutrality and to maintain continuity with the EU's carbon trading system. The UK Emissions Trading Scheme works on the “cap and trade” principle, where a cap is set on the total amount of certain greenhouse gases that can be emitted by sectors covered by the scheme. The intention is that this limits the total amount of carbon that can be emitted, and as it decreases over time. The first auctions on the UK Emissions Trading Scheme took place on 19 May 2021.

The storage of certain hazardous substances on site will additionally require hazardous substances planning consent to be obtained from the local planning authority.

Planning consents may contain additional requirements and restrictions with regard to environmental impacts such as noise and dust levels.

For offshore oil and gas operations, there are some differences to the permitting regime that, for example, require permits from BEIS for discharges of oil or chemicals to the marine environment, and to vent or flare natural gas.

9.2 What provisions need to be made for storage of tailings and other waste products and for the closure of mines?

Most mining operations will require a permit from the EA to manage extractive waste as a waste management operation, and some will include operating a mining waste facility. Operators must take necessary measures to ensure that extractive waste is managed in a controlled manner without endangering human health or harming the environment.

A mining waste environmental permit is required to cover all waste streams generated by the mining operation, with the exception of waste unrelated to extraction, such as domestic waste from on-site worker facilities. A permit may also be necessary for any waste accumulated or stored at the site that contains naturally occurring radioactivity above a minimum level (NORMS).

The requirements for both types of permits are set out in the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016. Higher requirements apply to mining waste facilities categorised as posing a high-level hazard (Category A) or which involve hazardous as opposed to non-hazardous or inert waste.

Operators must, as part of their permit application, prepare a waste management plan, including classification of all extractive waste streams in accordance with EU methods, and including a closure plan for the facility. Operators must also use best available techniques (BAT) for the minimisation of environmental impacts from their operations, which may change over time due to technological progress. Guidance on BAT for mining waste facilities is set out in the EU BAT Reference Document (BREF), which is periodically revised and may result in permits being updated.

Under the Mines Regulations 2014, there is also an obligation to build tips in such a way as to avoid instability or movement that could risk the health and safety of any person. This requires the mine operator to ensure that a competent person carries out an appraisal at appropriate intervals. If, following this, there is deemed to be a risk, a geotechnical specialist is required to carry out an assessment.

In addition, Regulation 2 of the Environment Act 2021 amended the Environmental Protection Act 1990 to include powers to make regulations on hazardous waste and to expand existing powers to regulate international waste shipments.

Following a report by the Law Commission on “Regulating Coal Tip Safety in Wales”,the Welsh government is also in the process of drafting a Disused Spoil Tip Safety Bill that would introduce a new legislative management regime for maintaining and monitoring disused coal tips, including establishing a new public body to ensure compliance. It is expected that this legislation will be proposed by the Welsh government this year.

9.3 What liabilities does a mining company face in the event that mining activities result in ground water or other contamination affecting third parties?

Mining activities that result in ground water or other contamination affecting third parties may result in liability under the Environmental Damage Regulations 2015. Under this regime, a remediation notice may be served on the mining company responsible for contamination, and this will set out the remedial measures to be undertaken and the deadlines for implementing such remedial measure. It is an offence to not comply with this remediation notice, and if a mining company is found to have committed an offence with the consent or connivance of its directors or senior officers, those persons may be punishable by up to three months' imprisonment in the case of a summary conviction, up to two years' imprisonment on indictment in the Crown Court, and an unlimited fine. The mining company may also be liable for the enforcing authority's administrative costs incurred in the process of preparing notices, assessing environmental damage, carrying out necessary consultations and monitoring remediation.

9.4 What are the closure obligations of the holder of a reconnaissance right, exploration right or mining right?

There is no statutory framework that is generally applicable. This is addressed through a combination of the conditions of the relevant consents and permits held and any provisions within property agreements.

Planning permissions are likely to include site restoration programmes that need to be complied with.

To surrender certain environmental permits, including those for mining waste operations, the operator will need to satisfy the regulator that necessary measures have been taken to avoid a risk of pollution and to return the site to a satisfactory state. The procedure for this must be outlined in a detailed closure plan agreed by the environmental regulator dealing with rehabilitation, after-closure procedures and monitoring.

9.5 Are there any social responsibility requirements (such as to invest in local infrastructure and communities) under applicable law or regulation?

There are currently no requirements to invest in local infrastructure and communities under law or regulation in England and Wales. The primary requirement relating to social responsibility in the UK is from section 54 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015. This requires large organisations that have a total turnover of at least £36 million and carry on business in the UK to prepare a slavery and human trafficking statement. This statement must include what steps the organisation has taken to ensure that there is no human trafficking taking place in any of its supply chains or its business; otherwise, the organisation must disclose that it has taken no such steps. Currently, this may be enforced through an injunction, and failure to comply with the injunction will result in an organisation being in contempt of a court order and liable for an unlimited fine. There are also proposals to introduce financial penalties for organisations that do not comply with section 54.

9.6 Are there any zoning or planning requirements applicable to the exercise of a reconnaissance, exploration or mining right?

In England and Wales, planning permission is required for the carrying out of mining operations. Express planning permission is granted by the local MPA. In England, the MPA is the county planning authority in respect of a site in a non-metropolitan county and the local planning authority in respect of a site in a metropolitan district or London borough. In Wales, the local planning authority is also the MPA.

Applications for planning permission must be taken in accordance with the relevant development plan unless (amongst other things) there are material considerations that indicate otherwise. There is no definition of “material considerations” and the MPA has a wide discretion in determining this. Guidance published by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government confirms that planning is concerned with land use in the public interest, so that the protection of purely private interests (e.g., impact on the value of neighbouring property or loss of private rights to light) could not be material considerations. In England, the National Planning Policy Framework, which sets out the government's planning policy and has a section on facilitating the sustainable use of minerals, is a material consideration that must be taken into account where it is relevant to a planning application.

In planning for mineral extraction, MPAs are encouraged to designate: (i) “Specific Sites”, where viable resources are known to exist, landowners are supportive of minerals development, and the proposal is likely to be acceptable in planning terms; (ii) “Preferred Areas”, which are areas of known resources where planning permission might reasonably be anticipated; and (iii) “Areas of Search”, where knowledge of mineral resources may be less certain but within which planning permission may be granted. Such areas may also include adjacent land for the essential operations associated with mineral extraction.

Planning permissions granted for the working of minerals usually include conditions, which can regulate how the development is carried out and which will usually impose restoration and aftercare requirements. Conditions will, crucially, determine the life of the mineral planning permission by imposing a time limit. If permission is refused, there is a right of appeal to central government, which also has the power to recover jurisdiction of certain applications and appeals where it considers them to conflict with national policy in important ways or be nationally significant.

Separate rules apply in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

10. Native Title and Land Rights

10.1 Does the holding of native title or other statutory surface use rights have an impact upon reconnaissance, exploration or mining operations?

There is no concept of native title – as it exists in other countries such as Australia and Canada – in English law. Other grounds may exist, however, on which third parties will be able to claim access to the surface of land, such as rights of way (public or private), easements and agreements of the landowner with electricity and other utility providers.

11. Health and Safety

11.1 What legislation governs health and safety in mining?

The Mines Regulations 2014 and the Quarries Regulations 1999 (QR) constitute the primary legislation governing health and safety in mining operations.

The legislation governing health and safety in the workplace applies to mining operations. The principal legislation is the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, and beneath it are several sets of regulations governing individual aspects of worker health and safety, such as handling work equipment, hazardous substances and explosives and managing the risk of fire, explosion and other incidents. Breach of health and safety regulations is a criminal offence for which mine operators may face prosecution.

Under the 1974 Act, every employer has a duty to ensure that, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of employees and others in the employer's workplace are protected. All employers with five or more employees must have a written health and safety policy, which must be brought to the notice of all employees. Criminal liability arises for breach of regulation and may result in prosecution.

11.2 Are there obligations imposed upon owners, employers, managers and employees in relation to health and safety?

The entity in day-to-day control of safety at the mine will most likely be the entity acting as the mine operator. Where this is a different entity from the mine owner, the mine owner is responsible under health and safety regulation to take care to appoint a suitable operator and to exercise a degree of continuing oversight of health and safety management by that operator. This may, for example, entail periodic meetings with the operator and the provision of reports and notification to the owner where issues or incidents arise.

The QR place most duties on the “operator”, being the person with overall control of the working of a quarry. However, the quarry owner must not permit another person to be the operator of the quarry unless that person is suitable and has sufficient resources to be able to operate the quarry safely. The operator then has general duties to ensure health and safety at the quarry, including producing a “health and safety document”.

An employer also owes its employees a duty of care in employment law, which means that it should take all steps that are reasonably possible to ensure the health, safety and wellbeing of its employees. The requirements under an employer's duty of care are wide-ranging and include, in particular:

• clearly defining jobs and undertaking risk assessments;
• ensuring a safe work environment;
• providing adequate training and feedback on performance;
• ensuring that staff do not work excessive hours;
• providing areas for rest and relaxation;
• providing communication channels for employees to raise concerns; and
• consulting employees on issues that concern them.

The failure of an employer to properly discharge its duties to employees may result in liability for negligence, vicarious liability or strict liability for the employer, as well as criminal prosecution by the HSE and/or the issue of a prohibition or improvement notice (with which failure to comply may itself result in fines and prosecution). Since the entry into force of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, companies can also be held criminally liable for serious failures in the management of health and safety that result in a fatality.

12. Administrative Aspects

12.1 Is there a central titles registration office?

A register of interests in land in England and Wales, including any registered interests acquired or granted for mining purposes, is kept by the Land Registry, which is the central title registration office in England and Wales. Importantly, however, the registration of mines and minerals held apart from the surface is not compulsory; therefore, unless the minerals constitute the surface or outcrop (which would trigger the usual rules regarding compulsory registration that apply to the surface), they can be transferred or leased without any registration implications. Following a thorough review of this area of law (and, in particular, the Land Registration Act 2002) over recent years, the Law Commission has advocated in favour of making the registration of all mines and minerals compulsory. This reflects the desire for the register to reveal a complete picture of land ownership. In the government's full response to the Law Commission published in March 2021, the government does not accept the Law Commission's recommendation to introduce compulsory triggers for registration of estates in mines and minerals. It also rejects the recommendation for surface owners to be notified of an application to register an estate in mines and minerals beneath their land but acknowledges the intention to provide transparency for property owners and agrees to consult further on the issue.

Some mineral owners have already pursued voluntary registration of their interests, and it is not uncommon to encounter separate titles for underground mines and minerals. In granting such titles, the Land Registry will not necessarily notify the owner of the surface title that the separate mines and minerals title has been created.

Registration of minerals can often be problematic, as the conventional conveyancing procedure for surface land will rarely be sufficient to allow the grant of an absolute title to mines and minerals. Specialist advice will usually be sought.

Information about individual licences and other rights granted by the government authorities and other public bodies can often be found on their respective websites or obtained by making an enquiry.

The BGS, through its “BritPits” database, also holds extensive information on mines and quarries in the UK. This information includes details of the name of the mines and quarries, their location and address, the geology and mineral commodities produced, the name of the operator and the responsible MPA.

12.2 Is there a system of appeals against administrative decisions in terms of the relevant mining legislation?

Available appeal routes will depend on the type of administrative decision and the public authority that adopted it. In each case, applicable legislation will first need to be checked for any statutory provisions providing for appeals. Otherwise, judicial review is generally available in respect of public law decisions (although, as a remedy of last resort, any statutory appeal right may need to be exercised first).

13. Constitutional Law

13.1 Is there a constitution that has an impact upon rights to conduct reconnaissance, exploration and mining?

The UK does not have a formally adopted written constitution. Its constitutional framework is formed around a number of fundamental acts and principles that formulate the country's body politic. The framework governing the rights of reconnaissance, exploration and mining is set out in the mining legislation and case law.

13.2 Are there any State investment treaties that are applicable?

The UK is party to over 100 bilateral and multilateral investment treaties with other states that provide protections to foreign investors operating in the UK. These treaties are governed by public international law and provide companies with additional protections that are independent of any protections afforded by domestic laws and contractual relationships.

Full texts of the UK's current investment treaties are available online and can be accessed from multiple sources, including the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office website.

14. Taxes and Royalties

14.1 Are there any special rules applicable to taxation of exploration and mining entities?

Within the UK's taxation regime, there are no special rules applicable to mining companies (in contrast to the oil and gas sector, which is subject to a distinct taxation regime).

14.2 Are there royalties payable to the State over and above any taxes?

There are no royalties payable to the government over and above any taxes. Royalties in the form of payment for the right to work the minerals may, however, be specified in the agreements with TCE or private landowners. In particular, the rights to extract minerals from the seabed within the 12-nautical-mile territorial limit are granted by TCE subject to the payment of royalties.

15. Regional and Local Rules and Laws

15.1 Are there any local provincial or municipal laws that need to be taken account of by a mining company over and above National Legislation?

Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland can pass their own laws and further regulations within the powers devolved to their respective parliamentary assemblies. These powers generally include the licensing and oversight of exploration and mining activities onshore in the respective territories and will need to be consulted.

The roles of county councils and other local authorities will typically be limited to preparing development plans for the relevant area and reviewing and granting planning permissions.

15.2 Are there any regional rules, protocols, policies or laws relating to several countries in the particular region that need to be taken account of by an exploration or mining company?

Although the UK left the EU on 31 January 2020, many of the EU mining regulations have remained in force after the UK's exit as retained EU legislation that forms part of UK domestic law. As noted within this chapter, where EU legislation has not been retained, domestic legislation enacted by the government post-Brexit has not shown any significant divergence from current EU regulations. The UK's approach is not expected to change at the time of writing.

The UK is also a party to the regional Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR Convention), which was adopted in 1992 together with a Final Declaration and an Action Plan. The OSPAR Convention deals with such areas as prevention and elimination of pollution from various sources, assessment of the quality of the marine environment, and protection and conservation of the ecosystems and biological diversity of the marine area.

While not exclusive to mining, the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments (BWM Convention) is applicable to industries that may involve waterborne activities. It focuses on preventing the spread of invasive aquatic species via ships' ballast water. Mining companies involved in offshore exploration, transport, or operations using ships might need to comply with ballast water management practices under this Convention.

Some of the European and international treaties provide frameworks for EIAs when mining operations or reconnaissance activities have a transboundary effect. For example, the Espoo Convention sets out obligations for countries to assess the environmental impact of projects in one country that may affect the environment of other countries in the region. If a mining project involves the construction of cross-border infrastructure, such as pipelines or roads that affect multiple countries, the company may need to comply with the Espoo Convention or similar regional EIA regulations.

16. Cancellation, Abandonment and Relinquishment

16.1 Are there any provisions in mining laws entitling the holder of a right to abandon it either totally or partially?

While there is no general prohibition on surrendering the right to explore for or mine minerals, the exact procedure will depend on the type of licence and the authority that granted the right in question in the first place.

Surrender of coal licences for exploration and mining, for example, is provided for under the model licence documents and requires a month's notice from the licensee.

Environmental permits received in connection with mining operations can also be surrendered in full or in part. In some cases, however, a fee will be payable to process a surrender application.

16.2 Are there obligations upon the holder of an exploration right or a mining right to relinquish a part thereof after a certain period of time?

Generally, there is no legal requirement or practice for the holder of an exploration or mining right to surrender a part thereof (other than in petroleum licences for offshore exploration, which are outside the scope of this review). In case of a privately granted licence, however, its terms will need to be consulted for any unusual or onerous requirements.

16.3 Are there any entitlements in the law for the State to cancel an exploration or mining right on the basis of failure to comply with conditions?

Failure to comply with the licence conditions is a ground for revocation of the licence or refusal to extend it for a new term. Termination is usually not automatic but requires a notice from the competent authority or other public body to remedy the breach within a specific period of time, failing which the licence can be revoked without further compensation.

Planning, environmental and other permits obtained in connection with exploration and mining operations will also be subject to various conditions, and non-compliance with those conditions will be a ground for cancellation of the relevant permits.

17. Mining Finance: Granting and Perfecting Security

17.1 In relation to the financing of mines, is it possible to give asset security by means of a general security agreement or is an agreement required in relation to each type of asset? Briefly, what is the procedure?

There are no requirements to have a security agreement in relation to each type of asset. There are no rules specific to security agreements granted in the financing of mines and the procedure for granting security will depend on the type of asset, as set out below.

17.2 Can security be taken over real property (land), plant, machinery and equipment (whether underground or overground)? Briefly, what is the procedure?

Security can be taken over real property through a legal mortgage, an equitable mortgage, a fixed charge or a floating charge. A legal mortgage must be in writing and executed as a deed. Where registered land is involved, the charge must also be registered at the Land Registry. An equitable mortgage, a fixed charge and a floating charge must be in writing and signed by the grantor. These charges will customarily be granted through a deed and executed by both parties. In addition, security can be taken over plant, machinery and equipment through a pledge, lien, fixed charge or floating charge. For perfection of security, all charges should be registered at Companies House by completing Form MR01.

17.3 Can security be taken over receivables where the chargor is free to collect the receivables in the absence of a default and the debtors are not notified of the security? Briefly, what is the procedure?

Security can be taken over receivables through a statutory assignment, equitable assignment, fixed charge or floating charge. However, generally, notice is given to relevant counterparties when a security interest is created over receivables, and that notice may determine the priority of the security or protect against subsequent set-off rights. For perfection of security, all charges should be registered at Companies House by completing Form MR01, and a charge over equitable receivables must be in writing and signed by the chargor.

17.4 Can security be taken over cash deposited in bank accounts? Briefly, what is the procedure?

Yes, security can be taken over cash deposits through a statutory assignment, equitable assignment, fixed charge or floating charge. For perfection of security, all charges must be registered at Companies House by completing Form MR01, writing or signing by the mortgagor or chargor, and notice to the third-party bank if the cash deposit is being held with a third-party bank.

17.5 Can security be taken over shares in companies incorporated in your jurisdiction? Are the shares in certificated form? Briefly, what is the procedure?

Yes, security can be taken over shares through a mortgage, charge, pledge or lien. If security is being created over shares in an English company, charges will have to be perfected by registering the charge at Companies House with a completed Form MR01. In the case of a legal mortgage over shares in certificated form, the mortgage can be created by depositing the certificates of title with the mortgagee.

17.6 What are the notarisation, registration, stamp duty and other fees (whether related to property value or otherwise) in relation to security over different types of assets (in particular, shares, real estate, receivables and chattels)?

The current fee for delivering a paper Form MR01 to the register is £24 and the fee for electronic filing of Form MR01 is £15. In addition, for registering legal mortgages over registered land, the Land Registry currently charges a fee from £45 to £305 per registered title based on the value of the transaction. Generally, the granting of security does not incur stamp duty, and security documents do not require notarisation to be registered or enforced in English courts.

17.7 Do the filing, notifications or registration requirements in relation to security over different types of assets involve a significant amount of time or expense?

No, there are no notarisation requirements. Generally, stamp taxes are not payable, and registration fees are nominal.

17.8 Are any regulatory or similar consents required with respect to the creation of security over real property (land), plant, machinery and equipment at a mining operation?

No, there are no consent rules specific to mining operations, and the creation of security at a mining operation would fall within the processes described above.

18. Other Matters

18.1 What actions, if any, could be taken by the Government to encourage further foreign direct investment in the mining industry?

The rush for critical minerals in the UK poses the best opportunities for inward foreign investment into the UK. To the extent that surveys for domestic mineral reserves yield positive results, the UK government may be inclined to encourage FDI in UK mining projects. A number of reasons make this likely: firstly, the UK may need to draw upon the significant experience available from international mining companies; secondly, new mining projects have significant capital requirements, which neither government nor domestic UK companies may be able to meet without foreign investment; and thirdly, in the event of a rapid increase in critical mineral demand brought by the technology scale-ups and geopolitical events described above, domestic companies may struggle to meet demand from scratch. The UK Critical Minerals Strategy notes that developing a regime to encourage inbound FDI can accelerate the development of critical mineral extraction, refining, processing and recycling capabilities. Though the terms of this regime are yet to be set out in detail, the Strategy suggests that the government can build upon the recent successes of the Cornish Lithium mine described above, in buoying a UK startup with state-backed capital.

On the basis of actions taken by governments in other jurisdictions with a similar agenda, the government could take several actions that would help address the capital, regulatory, and geopolitical challenges faced by foreign investors, such as:

• Simplifying Permitting Processes: The current planning and permitting processes for mining operations can be lengthy and complex. The government could look at ways to streamline and accelerate these processes without compromising environmental standards. This could involve setting up fast-track permitting procedures for critical mineral projects.
• Reducing Regulatory Barriers: Addressing regulatory bottlenecks, particularly with regard to environmental and zoning regulations, would help investors navigate through local challenges more easily. Some jurisdictions have faced delays due to opposition from local environmental groups or long public consultation periods. A more predictable and transparent regulatory environment could encourage greater investment.
• Encouraging Sustainable Mining Practices: By providing clearer incentives for sustainable and green mining technologies, the government could ensure that projects are environmentally responsible while attracting investors keen on adhering to sustainable standards.
• Tax Relief or Reduced Tax Rates: The government could offer tax incentives to foreign investors, such as tax credits, exemptions, or deductions on investment in mining infrastructure or research and development related to critical minerals. These incentives could be extended to both foreign companies and joint ventures with domestic players.
• Government-Backed Loans/Grants: The government could also consider providing state-backed loans, grants, or guarantees to foreign investors, similar to the support provided for new energy projects. The Cornish Lithium mine is a good example of how state-backed capital helped get a UK startup off the ground.
• Special Economic Zones (SEZs): Another possibility is the creation of SEZs that offer benefits like tax holidays or other incentives for mining companies, particularly those involved in critical minerals.

All being said, the backing of foreign investment in the UK mining sector will need to be balanced with national interests and environmental concerns, and energy independence will be a key challenge, especially as the UK seeks to ensure that foreign investments align with long-term national goals for sustainability and self-sufficiency in critical minerals. To encourage FDI in the UK's mining industry, the government will also need to assuage any concerns with environmental and planning regulations, which have very often been the sticking point for activists to lodge legal hurdles.

Originally published by ICLG.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.