Ireland has positioned itself at the forefront of European artificial intelligence regulation by designating 15 national competent authorities to enforce the EU AI Act.
It is one of the first Member States to do so, marking a significant milestone in the bloc's approach to governing artificial intelligence systems across Member States.
The Irish government's announcement on 16 September 2025 represents one of the most comprehensive regulatory frameworks established under the EU AI Act. This distributed enforcement model leverages existing regulatory expertise across multiple sectors while establishing coordinated oversight mechanisms that other Member States are likely study as they develop their own implementation strategies.
Strategic Regulatory Architecture
Ireland's approach reflects a sophisticated understanding of AI's cross-sectoral impact. Rather than creating entirely new regulatory bodies, Dublin has strategically aligned AI oversight with existing institutional competencies, ensuring regulatory coherence while avoiding bureaucratic duplication.
The 15 designated authorities span critical economic sectors: the Central Bank of Ireland will oversee financial AI applications, while Coimisiún na Meán handles media-related systems. The Commission for Communications Regulation addresses telecommunications AI, and transport-related artificial intelligence falls under the Commission for Railway Regulation and the National Transport Authority.
The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission has consumer protection responsibilities, while the Data Protection Commission leverages its established expertise in privacy regulation. Healthcare AI systems will be regulated by the Health Products Regulatory Authority and Health Services Executive, with workplace safety aspects managed by the Health and Safety Authority and Workplace Relations Commission.
The Commission for Regulation of Utilities addresses AI in the energy and water sectors, while the Marine Survey Office handles maritime applications. Two ministerial offices retain direct oversight roles, ensuring political accountability for AI governance.
The 15 Designated National Competent Authorities
The comprehensive regulatory framework encompasses the following authorities:
- Central Bank of Ireland
- Coimisiún na Meán
- Commission for Communications Regulation
- Commission for Railway Regulation
- Commission for Regulation of Utilities
- Competition and Consumer Protection Commission
- Data Protection Commission
- Health and Safety Authority
- Health Products Regulatory Authority
- Health Services Executive
- Marine Survey Office of the Department of Transport
- Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment
- Minister for Transport
- National Transport Authority
- Workplace Relations Commission
This structure ensures specialized oversight across all sectors where AI systems operate, from financial services and media to transportation, healthcare, and workplace safety.
National AI Office: Central Coordination Hub
A National AI Office will be established by 2 August 2026 to serve as Ireland's central coordinating authority for AI Act implementation. This office will assume four critical functions:
- Coordinating competent authority activities to ensure consistent implementation of the EU AI Act across all sectors;
- Serving as the single point of contact for EU AI Act matters;
- Facilitating centralised access to technical expertise for other competent authorities as required; and,
- Driving AI innovation and adoption through hosting a regulatory sandbox while acting as Ireland's focal point for AI regulation, innovation and deployment.
The office represents Ireland's commitment to maintaining regulatory coherence across its distributed authority model while fostering innovation through structured regulatory experimentation. The regulatory sandbox will allow companies to test AI systems under modified regulatory conditions, providing valuable insights for industry and regulators.
Innovation and Compliance Balance
This regulatory structure demonstrates Ireland's recognition that effective AI governance requires both sector-specific expertise and coordinated implementation. Establishing a National AI Implementation Committee creates a forum for these diverse authorities to align their approaches and share regulatory intelligence.
The forthcoming National AI Office, scheduled for establishment by 2 August 2026, will be the central coordinating authority. This office will manage a regulatory sandbox, facilitating innovation while ensuring compliance with EU standards. The sandbox approach allows companies to test AI systems under relaxed regulatory conditions, providing valuable data for innovators and regulators.
EU-Wide Implications
Ireland's framework arrives as the European Commission has published its General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, a voluntary compliance mechanism for large AI model providers. This code addresses transparency requirements, copyright considerations, and safety protocols for general-purpose AI systems capable of performing diverse tasks across multiple applications.
The timing of Ireland's announcement suggests strategic coordination with Brussels. By establishing robust enforcement mechanisms early in the AI Act's implementation timeline, Ireland positions itself as a testing ground for regulatory approaches that may influence EU-wide standards.
Competitive Positioning
The distributed authority model reflects Ireland's broader strategy of maintaining its attractiveness to technology companies while demonstrating regulatory credibility. By embedding AI oversight within established regulators rather than creating new bureaucratic layers, Ireland signals to international firms that compliance will be predictable and professionally managed.
The regulatory sandbox component particularly appeals to AI developers seeking European market access. Companies can engage with Irish authorities to test compliance approaches before full market deployment, reducing regulatory uncertainty that has historically deterred innovation in highly regulated sectors.
Global Regulatory Leadership
Ireland's comprehensive approach occurs against a backdrop of fragmented global AI governance. While the United States pursues executive orders and congressional hearings, and China implements its AI regulatory framework, the EU AI Act represents the most systematic attempt at comprehensive AI regulation worldwide.
Ireland contributes to the EU's global regulatory influence by establishing detailed enforcement mechanisms early. Technology companies developing AI systems for international markets increasingly design products to meet EU standards, knowing compliance with European requirements often exceeds regulatory demands elsewhere.
The success of Ireland's implementation will provide crucial data for other EU member states approaching their designation deadlines. Early regulatory experience will inform best practices for balancing innovation promotion with risk mitigation across the EU.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
