ARTICLE
1 April 2026

JSA Successfully Represented Tata Power Renewable Energy Limited Before The Supreme Court Of India Against The Andhra Pradesh Distribution Licensees In A Matter Related To Arbitrary Tariff Deductions Pertaining To Generation Based Incentive Granted To Wind Generators By The Central Government.

J
JSA

Contributor

JSA Advocates and Solicitors is a top-tier, full-service Indian law firm. Established in 1991, at the start of India’s economic liberalisation, the firm has built a strong reputation for handling complex and high-stakes legal and commercial matters. The firm is organised around specialist practice areas and industry sectors. It works closely with leading Indian corporates, Fortune 500 companies, global financial institutions, and government and statutory bodies on important corporate, financing, and disputes mandates. JSA has a team of over 700 legal professionals, including 180+ partners, and operates from 10 offices across seven cities in India: Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Gurugram, Hyderabad, Mumbai, and New Delhi. The firm is consistently recognised as a top-tier practice by leading international legal directories, including Chambers & Partners (Asia-Pacific and Global), Legal 500, and AsiaLaw.
On 25.03.2026, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a Civil Appeal filed by distribution licensees in Andhra Pradesh while holding that generation based incentive (“GBI”)...
India Andhra Pradesh Energy and Natural Resources
Abhishek Munot’s articles from JSA are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Media & Information and Construction & Engineering industries

On 25.03.2026, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a Civil Appeal filed by distribution licensees in Andhra Pradesh while holding that generation based incentive (“GBI”) granted by a Central Government Policy to Wind Power Generators cannot be clawed back by a state regulator and re-distributed to distribution licensee’s consumers by factoring the grant into generation tariff.

Supreme Court, inter alia, held that:

  • Although the Regulatory Commissions have plenary powers over tariff determination and are also empowered to take into account a grant made by the Central Government, such powers cannot be exercised in a manner that nullifies the policy intent. It must be exercised keeping in mind the purpose and objective of a policy or grant.
  • Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (APERC) was obliged to provide the benefit of GBI in terms of the purpose and object of the GBI Policy i.e., to incentivise renewable energy generators.
  • Policy decisions taken based on national and international de-carbonisation targets must be appropriately factored at various stages to ensure that investment in renewable energy is adequately promoted.
  • Regulators must not act in silos and must take a holistic approach while exercising tariff determination functions.
  • The electricity sector functions through the coordinated action of the Union Government, State Governments and independent Regulatory Commissions. Their powers must be read harmoniously so that each operates within their spheres, without rendering the other irrelevant.
  • A “generator-based incentive” cannot be converted into a “consumer subsidy”, which is contrary to the policy under which the incentive was granted.

Supreme Court’s progressive Judgment marks a significant win for renewable energy generators in the State of Andhra Pradesh, bringing an end to over 8 years of arbitrary tariff deductions by distribution licensees in Andhra Pradesh on account of GBI which were being illegally retained by the distribution licensees in Andhra Pradesh.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More