- within Privacy topic(s)
- with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
- in United States
- with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy, Retail & Leisure and Law Firm industries
A practical guide to DPDP Rules 2025 and website compliance in India, covering privacy notices, consent mechanisms and regulatory penalties.
1. Why Website Compliance Has Become a Legal Imperative
India's digital economy is expanding at an unprecedented pace. From government portals and multinational corporations to MSMEs, startups, professionals and content creators, almost every entity today operates a website or digital interface. What was once merely a marketing or information tool has now become a primary medium for service delivery, customer engagement and commercial transactions. This rapid growth in digital presence has inevitably led to large-scale collection and processing of personal data, often without users fully understanding how their information is being used.
The notification of the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 marks a decisive shift in India's data governance framework. For the first time, Legal and IT teams across sectors are legally obligated to rethink how they collect, store, use and disclose personal data. Compliance is no longer optional or best practice driven; it is now a statutory requirement backed by significant financial penalties.
Businesses have been granted an 18 month transition window to align their digital systems with the new law. However, the implications go far beyond updating a privacy policy or adding a cookie banner. The DPDP Rules fundamentally reshape how websites must be designed, operated and governed in India's digital ecosystem.
2. Growing Online Presence and the Compliance Challenge
In today's digital first environment, having an online presence is no longer a strategic choice; it is a commercial necessity. Businesses rely on websites for lead generation, e-commerce transactions, customer onboarding, analytics and marketing automation. Government departments increasingly use online portals to deliver public services, reduce paperwork and improve accessibility. Platforms such as UIDAI for Aadhaar services and RTI Online portals demonstrate how governance itself has moved into the digital domain.
This expanding reliance on digital platforms comes with a parallel expansion in data collection. Websites today do not merely collect names or email addresses through forms. They automatically track IP addresses, browser fingerprints, device identifiers, geolocation data, session duration, behavioural patterns and interaction history. While these datasets often appear technical or anonymised, modern analytics tools can easily combine them to create highly detailed user profiles.
The compliance challenge arises because most websites were never designed with data protection by default. Many entities, particularly small businesses and government bodies, continue to operate with minimal disclosures, outdated privacy notices or no privacy documentation at all. The DPDP Rules change this landscape entirely by bringing every website that processes personal data within a regulated framework.
3. Personal Data Collection Through Websites: A Legal Re-Characterisation
One of the most significant shifts introduced by the DPDP framework is how personal data is legally understood. The Act defines personal data broadly as any data about an individual who is identifiable, directly or indirectly. This means that even technical data such as IP addresses, cookie identifiers or device information can qualify as personal data if it can be linked to a specific individual.
Virtually every website operating in India today collects personal data at some level. Automatic data collection happens the moment a user visits a website, often without any active interaction. Cookies track browsing behaviour, server logs record IP addresses, analytics tools measure user engagement and third-party plugins silently transmit information to external servers. In many cases, users remain unaware of the scale or purpose of this data processing.
Historically, websites treated such data as operational metadata rather than regulated personal data. The DPDP Act dismantles this distinction. From a legal standpoint, if data can be reasonably associated with a person, it triggers compliance obligations. This re-characterisation places almost all websites squarely within the scope of the new law.
4. How the DPDP Framework Alters Website Obligations
With the DPDP Act and Rules now notified, websites are no longer passive digital assets; they are regulated data processing systems. Every website operator becomes a data fiduciary if it determines the purpose and means of processing personal data. This applies equally to commercial websites, professional service websites, SaaS platforms, government portals and even informational sites that track visitor analytics.
Transparency emerges as a central obligation under the DPDP framework. Websites must clearly communicate what data is collected, why it is collected, how long it is retained and with whom it is shared. Vague or generic disclosures are no longer sufficient. Users, referred to as data principals, must be able to understand data practices in plain language.
Consent is another cornerstone of compliance. Websites can no longer rely on implied consent or pre-ticked boxes. Consent must be free, specific, informed and unambiguous. Importantly, users must be able to withdraw consent as easily as they provide it. This requirement forces websites to rethink consent design, user journeys and backend data flows.
Security and accountability obligations also intensify. Website operators are expected to implement reasonable technical and organisational measures to prevent data breaches. The Rules further require internal governance structures, grievance redressal mechanisms and audit readiness, particularly for entities designated as significant data fiduciaries.
5. Website-Specific Compliance Requirements Under the DPDP Rules, 2025
5.1 Cookie Consent and Tracking Technologies
Under the DPDP Rules, the use of cookies and similar tracking technologies becomes a consent-driven activity rather than a technical default. Websites must disclose the purpose of cookies, whether they are essential, functional, analytical or marketing-related. Users must be given a genuine choice to accept or reject non-essential cookies without being denied core website functionality.
This requirement significantly impacts advertising-driven websites, e-commerce platforms and content publishers that rely on behavioural analytics. Cookie banners must now be designed not merely for visibility but for legal validity. Dark patterns that nudge users into consent may expose websites to enforcement action.
5.2 Privacy Notices and Transparency Standards
The privacy notice becomes a central compliance document under the DPDP Rules. Websites must publish a clear, accessible and comprehensive privacy notice that explains data collection practices in simple language. The notice must identify the categories of personal data collected, the purposes of processing, data retention periods, grievance mechanisms and user rights.
Many existing privacy policies, including those of public authorities, fall short of this standard. For example, the privacy disclosure of Securities and Exchange Board of India has historically been brief and limited in scope, reflecting an older compliance mindset. Under the DPDP framework, such minimal disclosures are unlikely to meet statutory expectations.
5.3 Consent Management and Withdrawal
Consent management is no longer a one-time event. Websites must ensure that consent can be withdrawn at any stage and that such withdrawal is honoured promptly. This has technical implications for backend systems, CRM tools, marketing databases and third-party integrations.
For websites offering user accounts or dashboards, consent management tools may need to be embedded within user settings. For simpler websites, accessible communication channels must be provided to enable users to exercise their rights effectively.
5.4 Grievance Redressal and Officer Disclosure
Rule 9 of the DPDP Rules, 2025 mandates that data fiduciaries publish the contact details of their grievance officer or data protection officer on their website. This requirement transforms grievance redressal from an internal process into a visible compliance feature.
Users must have a clear and effective mechanism to raise complaints related to data processing. Failure to respond to grievances within prescribed timelines can attract regulatory scrutiny and penalties.
5.5 Rights of Data Principals on Websites
Websites must inform users about their rights under the DPDP Act, including the right to access information, the right to correction, the right to erasure and the right to grievance redressal. These rights cannot remain theoretical. Website operators must establish processes to receive, verify and act upon user requests in a time-bound manner.
For businesses handling large volumes of user data, this may require dedicated workflows and trained personnel. For smaller entities, even basic compliance will require documented procedures and accountability structures.
5.6 Accountability and Audit Readiness
The DPDP Rules place strong emphasis on accountability. Websites operated by significant data fiduciaries will be subject to additional obligations such as data protection impact assessments, periodic audits and enhanced security safeguards. However, even non-significant data fiduciaries must demonstrate compliance readiness.
Internal audits, vendor due diligence and documentation of data processing activities become critical. Website compliance is no longer limited to front-end disclosures; it extends into contracts, IT systems and organisational governance.
6. Penalties and Enforcement Risks for Non-Compliant Websites
The enforcement regime under the DPDP Act is deliberately stringent. Financial penalties can go up to ₹250 crore for serious violations, including failure to implement reasonable security safeguards or unlawful processing of personal data. Even general non-compliance can attract penalties of up to ₹50 crore.
For website operators, this creates a direct business risk. Data breaches, improper consent practices or failure to respond to user grievances can lead not only to financial penalties but also reputational damage. In an environment where user trust is increasingly tied to privacy practices, non-compliance can undermine brand credibility and customer confidence.
7. Strategic Compliance: Beyond Tick-Box Implementation
While the DPDP Rules impose mandatory obligations, they also offer an opportunity for organisations to build trust-centric digital platforms. Websites that transparently communicate data practices and respect user choices are likely to enjoy stronger user engagement and loyalty.
From a strategic perspective, compliance should be viewed as an ongoing process rather than a one-time exercise. Website audits, consent reviews, policy updates and staff training must become part of regular governance cycles. For businesses with multiple digital touchpoints, harmonising compliance across websites, apps and platforms will be essential.
8. Conclusion: Redefining Digital Responsibility in India
India's data protection regime has entered a new era. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act and the DPDP Rules, 2025 redefine how websites operate, interact with users and manage personal data. Every online entity, whether a government department, corporate website or small business, must now align its digital practices with principles of transparency, consent and accountability.
Website compliance is no longer about legal formalities. It is about respecting user autonomy, safeguarding trust and ensuring sustainable digital growth. As India's digital footprint expands, the DPDP framework lays the foundation for a more responsible, secure and privacy-respecting online ecosystem. Entities that adapt early and thoughtfully will not only avoid penalties but also position themselves as trustworthy participants in India's evolving digital economy.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
