Founded by Managing Partner K.P. Sreejith, INDIALAW began as a small firm in Mumbai with a commitment to client service and corporate-focused legal solutions. From its modest beginnings, the firm has grown into a respected name by prioritizing excellence, integrity, and tailored legal strategies. INDIALAW’s team believes in adapting to each client’s unique needs, ensuring that solutions align with individual circumstances and business goals.
The firm combines its deep understanding of the local business landscape with experience across multiple jurisdictions, enabling clients to navigate complex legal environments effectively. INDIALAW emphasizes proactive service, anticipating client needs and potential challenges to provide timely, high-quality legal support. The firm values lasting client relationships and sees its role as a trusted advisor, dedicated to delivering business-friendly and principled legal counsel.
The Kerala High Court examines a critical legal question in landlord-tenant law: whether a property owner can be prosecuted for criminal trespass when entering premises they own but are lawfully occupied by a tenant. This case explores the nuanced distinction between ownership rights and possessory rights in the context of criminal law.
within Real Estate and Construction, International Law and Law Department Performance topic(s)
In this edition of Podcast Bites, powered by IndiaLaw LLP, host Mubaraka Babbar examines the Kerala High Court’s decision in Damodaran K. v. State of Kerala, which clarifies the legal distinction between ownership and possession in landlord-tenant disputes. The case addresses an important question: can a property owner be held liable for trespass in premises owned by them but lawfully occupied by a tenant? The Kerala High Court affirmed that criminal trespass and house trespass are offences against possession, not merely ownership. Accordingly, a landlord cannot resort to forcible entry or self-help measures merely on the basis of title to the property.
The episode also discusses the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction, the protection available to tenants in lawful possession, and the importance of pursuing remedies through appropriate legal proceedings rather than forcible eviction. Listen to the episode for a concise overview of the factual background, the Court’s reasoning, the modification of sentence, and the key legal takeaways for landlords and tenants.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
