ARTICLE
29 January 2026

Supreme Court Allows Practice Of Post-facto Environmental Clearance

The Supreme Court while placing reliance on Section 15 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 ("EPA") the provision neither authorizes nor prohibits regularisation of projects and the understanding that the projects must be stopped and demolished after penalties are paid is an incorrect interpretation of statute
India Environment
Sagus Legal LLP’s articles from Sagus Legal are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Advertising & Public Relations and Law Firm industries
Sagus Legal are most popular:
  • within Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration, Real Estate and Construction and Technology topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives and HR
  • in Middle East

The Supreme Court through its judgement dated 18.11.2025 in Confederation of Real Estate Developers of India (CREDAI) v. Vanashakti and Anr1 recalled its earlier verdict in Vanashakti v. Union of India2 dated 16.05.2025 and held that Environmental Clearance ("EC") can be granted in case of permissible activities as defined under the applicable regulatory framework.

The Supreme Court while placing reliance on Section 15 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 ("EPA") the provision neither authorizes nor prohibits regularisation of projects and the understanding that the projects must be stopped and demolished after penalties are paid is an incorrect interpretation of statute.

Footnotes

1.Diary No. 41929 of 2025.

2.WP (C) No. 1394 of 2023.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More