On May 27, 2022, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed an order by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") denying a whistleblower award under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank"), holding that information provided to the SEC prior to Dodd-Frank's enactment did not qualify for a whistleblower award under the statute. Ross v. SEC, No. 21-1165 (D.C. Cir. 2022).
Background
Plaintiff-appellant Ross appealed the SEC's denial of his application for a whistleblower award. Between 2005 and 2008, Ross provided information to the SEC about securities violations that ultimately resulted in a successful SEC enforcement action in which defendants were ordered to pay approximately $100 million.
Among other financial reforms, Dodd-Frank authorized the SEC to give monetary awards to "whistleblowers who voluntarily provided original information to the Commission" when that information led to a successful enforcement resulting in sanctions of over $1 million. The regulations implementing Dodd-Frank define "original information" in the whistleblower context as, among other requirements, information provided to the SEC "for the first time after July 21, 2010," Dodd-Frank's date of enactment.
Ruling
The D.C. Circuit affirmed the SEC's denial, holding that the information Ross provided did not meet the Dodd-Frank definition of "original information" because it was first provided to the SEC prior to July 21, 2010.
Implications
This ruling confirms that the requirements in Dodd-Frank's whistleblower award provisions will be strictly construed.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
