- within Tax topic(s)
- with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
- in United States
- with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy and Property industries
Introduction
California remains one of the highest-tax jurisdictions in the United States, and recent changes to state income tax law—alongside federal adjustments—significantly impact individuals, families, and businesses. The state has introduced new tax brackets under Assembly Bill 1219, enacted apportionment changes for financial institutions under SB 132, and California taxpayers will also benefit indirectly from the federal increase in the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction cap. Together, these measures create both opportunities and challenges that require careful tax planning, and many individuals will benefit from the guidance of a knowledgeable U.S. tax lawyer.
Background
California's progressive tax structure has long been a defining feature of its fiscal policy. With recent legislative changes, the state has sought to adjust tax brackets, streamline revenue apportionment for certain businesses, and align tax policy with broader federal reforms. Taxpayers—particularly those in high-income brackets and those with multistate businesses—should pay close attention to these updates and consider consulting an experienced U.S. tax lawyer to ensure proper compliance and planning.
Key Changes in California Tax Law
Revised Income Tax Brackets (AB 1219)
Beginning with the 2025 tax year, Assembly Bill 1219 revises California's personal income tax brackets for a five-year period (2025–2029). Key highlights for single filers include:
- 1% on taxable income up to $25,499
- 3% on income from $25,499 – $40,245 (plus a base of $254.99)
- 5% on income from $40,245 – $55,866 (plus $697.37)
- 7% on income from $55,866 – $70,606 (plus $1,478.42)
- 9.3% on income over $70,606 (plus $2,510.22)
Notably, inflation adjustments are suspended for 2025, resuming in subsequent years. This pause could result in bracket creep, where taxpayers experience higher effective tax rates due to unadjusted thresholds. A seasoned U.S. tax lawyer can help model potential outcomes and recommend tax reduction strategies that comply with California tax law.
Apportionment Changes for Financial Institutions (SB 132)
Senate Bill 132, signed in June 2025, alters the method used by financial institutions to calculate their California tax liability. Previously, California used a double-weighted sales formula; under SB 132, financial institutions must apply a single-sales-factor apportionment.
This change disproportionately affects companies with significant operations outside California but substantial California-source sales. For many, this will translate into higher taxable income apportioned to California, thereby increasing state tax liabilities. Businesses navigating these changes should consult a top U.S. tax lawyer for strategic planning.
Federal SALT Deduction Relief and California Taxpayers
While not a state-level change, California taxpayers will be significantly impacted by the federal increase to the SALT deduction cap under the One Big Beautiful Bill enacted in mid-2025. The SALT deduction cap rises from $10,000 to $40,000 for tax years 2025 through 2029, with phased increases thereafter.
This provides substantial relief for California homeowners and high-income earners who pay large amounts in state income and property taxes. By claiming a higher SALT deduction, California residents can reduce their federal taxable income, indirectly easing the overall tax burden. Many taxpayers will find that an expert U.S. tax lawyer can assist in maximizing the benefit of this expanded deduction.
Implications for California Taxpayers
Individuals and Families: Adjusted state brackets may lower liabilities for some middle-income taxpayers, but the suspension of inflation adjustments in 2025 could raise effective rates. Federal SALT relief, however, will significantly benefit homeowners in high-tax counties.
High-Income Earners: The expanded federal SALT deduction is particularly valuable for taxpayers in higher brackets who typically exceed the $10,000 cap.
Financial Institutions: Companies must re-evaluate their California apportionment strategies under the new single-sales-factor system, which could materially increase California tax exposure.
Tax Professionals: Accountants and tax advisors should review withholding tables, employer compliance, and payroll adjustments to reflect these changes.
Pro Tax Tips
Review Your Withholding Early: Because 2025 brackets are adjusted and inflation indexing is paused, confirm that your withholding matches expected liability.
Maximize SALT Deductions: Homeowners and professionals should carefully document state and local tax payments to fully leverage the expanded deduction.
Strategic Business Planning: Financial institutions should assess whether restructuring or shifting sales strategies can mitigate the impact of single-sales-factor apportionment.
Consider Timing of Income and Deductions: Where possible, accelerate deductible expenses into 2025 to offset potential bracket creep.
Seek Professional Guidance: U.S. taxpayers facing complex multistate or high-income situations should consult a knowledgeable U.S. tax lawyer to develop tailored strategies.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will California tax rates decrease overall in 2025?
Not necessarily. While the brackets have been adjusted, the suspension of inflation indexing may raise effective tax burdens for some taxpayers.
How does the federal SALT deduction change help Californians?
By raising the cap from $10,000 to $40,000, many Californians—especially homeowners in high-tax areas—can deduct significantly more on their federal returns, reducing overall taxable income.
What is the biggest change for businesses?
Financial institutions will see the greatest impact due to mandatory single-sales-factor apportionment, which will likely increase California-sourced taxable income.
Should taxpayers change their withholding immediately?
Yes. Taxpayers should reassess their withholding in early 2025 to avoid underpayment penalties or unexpected year-end liabilities.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
