ARTICLE
30 October 2024

What KOSPA Could Mean For Child Safety And Privacy

E
Exponent

Contributor

Exponent logo

In an era of accelerating change, Exponent is the only premium engineering and scientific consulting firm with the depth and breadth of expertise to solve our clients’ most profoundly unique, unprecedented, and urgent challenges.

Exponent brings together 90+ technical disciplines and 950+ consultants to help our clients navigate the increasing complexity of more than a dozen industries, connecting decades of pioneering work in failure analysis to develop solutions for a safer, healthier, more sustainable world.

In July 2024, the U.S. Senate voted in favor of advancing S. 2073: Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (KOSPA).
United States Privacy

The Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act would require some platforms to safeguard the mental and physical health of children and teens

In July 2024, the U.S. Senate voted in favor of advancing S. 2073: Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (KOSPA). The legislation provides guidelines regarding a company's "duty of care" — a legal term referring to the moral or legal responsibility to prevent harm — to protect children and 13- to 17-year-old teens from harms on some online platforms and video games, messaging applications, and video streaming services (i.e., covered platforms). These harms are defined as:

  • "Consistent with evidence-informed medical information, the following mental health disorders: anxiety, depression, eating disorders, substance use disorders, and suicidal behaviors"
  • "Patterns of use that indicate or encourage addiction-like behaviors by minors"
  • "Predatory, unfair, or deceptive marketing practices, or other financial harms"

While President Biden has urged Congress to pass the bill, the Senate will need to reconcile its KOSPA bill with the House Committee on Energy and Commerce's revised versions of the Children and Teens' Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA 2.0) and the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) that address similar issues. If KOSPA remains intact through those negotiations and is signed into law, legislators will appoint a committee to provide further guidance on how to interpret KOSPA within 18 months of the law's passage. However, impacted companies can take the initiative to begin a programmatic approach towards achieving the goals now, which may include consulting with research experts in child development, user experience, and legal accountability.

Key takeaways

Under the most recent draft of KOSPA, covered platforms that provide services that are used or likely to be used by children and teens may be required to prioritize business, functional, and design requirements that address the developmental needs of such users. While designing platforms that are easy to use, compellingly consumable, and socially engaging may remain a high priority, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and legislators have signaled a need to focus on health-centric design requirements, particularly for minors.

Changes to the user interface and experience may need to satisfy harm-prevention requirements in ways that are clearly defined, operationalized, measured, and tracked. Additionally, oversight programs may be needed to inform updates to features based on the evolving horizon of potential new threats, while balancing a company's need to increase market share and profits.

Impact for clients

To comply with KOSPA as proposed, impacted platforms may need to:

  • Understand the extent and methods of child and teen platform use, and if applicable, approach website and app design with a greater intent of safeguarding children's and teens' health
  • Build trust, understanding, and agency among children, teens, and their caregivers in the context of algorithmically presented content by providing tools and information that are measurably clear, conspicuous, and easy to understand
  • Maintain accountability via third-party research, auditing, and public reporting:
    • Covered platforms may be required to use third-party research to understand how harm prevention features are performing on their platforms and how these features are perceived by experts (e.g., developmental psychologists) and end-users
    • Moreover, such findings may need to be presented at least annually in a public report produced by the covered platform that leverages third-party audit inspections

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More