ARTICLE
21 April 2022

FTC Obtains Permanent Injunction Against For-Profit Medical School

GP
Goodwin Procter LLP

Contributor

At Goodwin, we partner with our clients to practice law with integrity, ingenuity, agility, and ambition. Our 1,600 lawyers across the United States, Europe, and Asia excel at complex transactions, high-stakes litigation and world-class advisory services in the technology, life sciences, real estate, private equity, and financial industries. Our unique combination of deep experience serving both the innovators and investors in a rapidly changing, technology-driven economy sets us apart.
On April 15, 2022, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it obtained a permanent injunction against an Illinois-based, offshore, for-profit medical school for deceptive marketing practices.
United States Consumer Protection

On April 15, 2022, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it obtained a permanent injunction against an Illinois-based, offshore, for-profit medical school for deceptive marketing practices. In its complaint and stipulated order filed same-day in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, the FTC alleged that the school violated the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) when it used deceptive marketing practices to lure prospective students. Specifically, the FTC alleged that the school violated the TSR by overstating students' performance on the medical licensing exam and by overstating the number of students who match with a medical residency program after graduation. The FTC also alleged that the school violated various sections of the FTC Act when it failed to provide appropriate disclosures in its student-loan agreements. For example, the school's tuition financing contracts, which are credit agreements, failed to include a "Holder Rule Notice," informing the borrowers of their rights to assert legal claims and defenses against any subsequent holder of their contracts, or a "Credit Practices Rule" notice, notifying cosigners of certain obligations.

The stipulated recovery includes a judgment of $1.2 million, including $375,000 of forgiven debt for former students. The school is also permanently enjoined from misrepresenting its licensing exam pass rates or residency match rates. Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, commented on the order stating, "Schools and others who ignore the Holder Rule do so at their peril."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More