ARTICLE
29 November 2021

EPO Further Extends Videoconference For Opposition Division Oral Proceedings Until 31 May 2022

JA
J A Kemp LLP

Contributor

J A Kemp is a leading firm of European Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys. We combine independent thinking with collective excellence in all that we do. The technical and legal knowledge that we apply to the protection of our clients’ patents is outstanding in its breadth and depth. With around 100 science and technology graduates in the firm, including 50 PhDs, no area of science or technology is outside our scope. Our Patent Attorneys have collective in-depth expertise in patent law and procedure in every country of the world. The team of professionals who advise our clients on trade mark and design matters have backgrounds in major international law firms and hold qualifications as Chartered UK Trade Mark Attorneys, Solicitors and European Trade Mark Professional Representatives. Dedicated to this specialist area of intellectual property protection, the team has the expertise and resources to protect trade marks and designs in any market worldwide.
The EPO has announced that it is further extending the use of videoconference for opposition division oral proceedings until 31 May 2022.
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The EPO has announced that it is further extending the use of videoconference for opposition division oral proceedings until 31 May 2022. The current measures, whereby all opposition division oral proceedings take place by videoconference, were due to expire on 31 January 2022. We understand that this announcement means that no opposition division oral proceedings will take place in-person until after 31 May 2022. 

These measures do not apply to the Boards of Appeal, who resumed in-person oral proceedings in Munich to a limited extent on 18 May 2020 and are currently conducting both in-person oral proceedings and videoconference oral proceedings, on a case by case basis.

As we have previously reported, the Enlarged Board of Appeal issued a written decision in October 2021 for case G1/21 regarding the legality of holding oral proceedings by videoconference without the consent of the parties. They considered that in-person oral hearings represent the "gold standard" and parties should only be denied this option for "good reasons". If the EPO decides to continue conducting opposition division oral proceedings by videoconference without the consent of the parties once the pandemic is over, then it seems likely that challenges to this practice could arise based on the reasoning of the EBA's decision.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More