ARTICLE
26 March 2024

Court Of Appeal, 15 February 2024, Order On Fee For The Appeal

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
In the absence of a specific fee for a specific case, such a fee is to be charged for the case that is most comparable to the present case according...
Luxembourg Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

1. Key takeaways

Applicable court fees if the table of fees does not provide a fee for the specific action

In the absence of a specific fee for a specific case, such a fee is to be charged for the case that is most comparable to the present case according to the table of fees. The table of fees does not provide a fee for an appeal pursuant Rule 220.1(a) RoP against an order as to which party must bear the costs of the proceedings following the dismissal of an application for provisional measures pursuant to Rule 360 RoP. Thus, such an appeal is subject to the fees pursuant to Rule 220.1(c) RoP, Art. 62 UPCA, i.e., EUR 11.000,00.

2. Division

Court of Appeal, Luxembourg

3. UPC number

UPC_CoA_2/2024

4. Type of proceedings

Appeal proceedings, provisional proceedings

5. Parties

Defendants and appellants: 1. Meril GmbH 2. Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd.

Applicant and respondent: Edwards Lifesciences Corporation

6. Patent(s)

EP 3 763 331

7. Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 220.1 RoP, Rule 360 RoP, Art. 62 UPCA

To view the full article, click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More