Home
LexOrbis
Sonam Lhamu Bhutia
Sonam Lhamu Bhutia
LexOrbis
The Infringement By Biju & Anr, Held To Be Blatant And Absolutely Unequivocal
16 Sep 2011 | India
The Intellectual Property Board Quashes A Complaint Pending Before The Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC)
16 Sep 2011 | India
The Effect Of An Abandonment Order On The Pending Appeal Would Have To Be Considered By The IPAB On Merits
09 Sep 2011 | India
The Tea Board, India Loses Its Appeal Against The ITC - High Court Of Calcutta
09 Sep 2011 | India
Trial Court Decision Held "Not In Accordance With Law"- High Court Of Karnataka
09 Sep 2011 | India
Delhi High Court Dismisses Schreder S.A & Anr’s Interim Application.
09 Sep 2011 | India
For Offences U/S 63, 67 And 68 Of Copyright Act, There Is A Limitation Of 3 Years U/S 468 (2) (C) Cr.P.C. For Taking Cognizance.
30 Aug 2011 | India
"BILLI/CAT" Have No Connection With Measuring Tapes, Thus An Arbitrary Mark – Delhi High Court
30 Aug 2011 | India
Scan Biotech India & Another Successful In Establishing Infringement Of Its Trademark As Well As Infringement In Terms Of Section 29 (5), Trademark Act, 1999.
30 Aug 2011 | India
A Copyright Battle Between Sholay Media And Vodafone Essar – Delhi High Court
30 Aug 2011 | India
An Assignee Can Claim User As A Subsequent Proprietor Only If The Assignor Had A Right In The Mark
25 Aug 2011 | India
Fine Distinction To Be Made Between The Nature Of "Tenability" Of A Plea, While Considering A Temporary Injunction Motion On The One Hand , And For Stay Of Suit On The Other, While Exercising Jurisdiction Under Section 124 Of The Trademarks Act, 1999
25 Aug 2011 | India
A Trader Or Manufacturer Will Not Become An Exclusive Owner, By Merely Acquiring Registration Of A Mark
20 Aug 2011 | India
Whether An Appeal As Against An Order In The Review Petition Is Maintainable?--- An IPAB Decision
20 Aug 2011 | India
No Injunction Granted For Alleged Passing Off And Infringement Of Copyright For Use Of "PERFECT ABS" And "AB PRO PLUS"
19 Aug 2011 | India
The Essential Nature Of Cyberspace Mandates Flexible And Efficient Judicial Remedies- High Court Of Bombay
19 Aug 2011 | India
The Delhi High Court Finds No Reason To Interfere With Decisions Of The IPAB And The Deputy Registrar Of Trademarks
17 Aug 2011 | India
Assessing Whether Two Sets Of Goods Of Rival Parties Trading Under An Identical Mark Are Allied Or Related To Be Scrutinized More Closely, Than Earlier- High Court Of Calcutta
17 Aug 2011 | India
While Determining Whether Two Designs Are Identical Or Not, It Is Not Necessary That The Two Designs Be Exactly The Same
11 Aug 2011 | India
Reproduction Of Match Boxes For More Than 50 Times Over A Short Period Falls Under The Prohibition Of Section 15 (2), Copyright Act, 1957
11 Aug 2011 | India
< 1 2 3 >
Contact Details
New Delhi
Email Website
709/710, Tolstoy House
15-17, Tolstoy Marg
New Delhi
India
Telephone: 91-11-23716565

  © Mondaq® Ltd 1994 - 2022. All Rights Reserved.