ARTICLE
5 May 2026

Is CalPrivacy Gearing Up To Change CCPA Regulations Again?

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
California’s privacy regulator is seeking input on whether CCPA-related regulatory changes are needed in two areas. First, relating to privacy policy language requirements. And second, with respect to employees.
United States California Privacy
Liisa M. Thomas’s articles from Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • with Inhouse Counsel

California’s privacy regulator is seeking input on whether CCPA-related regulatory changes are needed in two areas. First, relating to privacy policy language requirements. And second, with respect to employees. In both categories, CalPrivacy is seeking input on seven questions. The deadline for submitting responses is May 20, 2026. Here’s what CalPrivacy is asking:

  • Privacy notice and disclosures: CalPrivacy wants to know if consumers are finding that companies’ current privacy policies do not include important information about privacy practices. CalPrivacy is also asking for any potentially effective ways for consumers to receive information about their rights. CalPrivacy is also seeking input on challenges businesses face when providing notice, and examples of effective notices. A “catch all” question – “what else CalPrivacy should consider regarding CCPA” – was also included in the request. 
  • Employees: CalPrivacy asked whether employees had received copies of privacy policies. And, to identify each “notice you received and describe your experience receiving the notice.” CalPrivacy also asked about current use of automated decision-making tools in hiring, performance management, and other HR functions. CalPrivacy also asked companies if they have had challenges drafting privacy notices and whether individuals find those notices understandable.

Putting It Into Practice: This current request suggests that CalPrivacy may be gearing up to change portions of its CCPA regulations. If that happens, the office will issue draft regulations for comment. We will be closely monitoring to track next steps.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More