The long-running dispute over the payment of Argentina's
sovereign debt, on which the South American nation defaulted for
the second time in July 2014, continues to be particularly
active.
On April 6, 2015, Argentina appealed a March 12, 2015, order of the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York that
blocked Citibank, N.A. ("Citibank") from processing
scheduled interest payments on $2.3 billion of Argentine-law
governed bonds issued as part of 2005 and 2010 debt restructurings.
Argentina's appeal claims that the order improperly extended a
2012 injunction which barred Argentina from making interest
payments on restructured bonds without also paying amounts owed to
holdout bondholders. However, on March 20, 2015, U.S. district
judge Thomas Griesa approved a stipulation between Argentina's
holdout bondholders and Citibank that conditionally authorized
Citibank's Argentine branch to make interest payments scheduled
for March 31 and June 30 on the Argentine-law bonds. The judge also
authorized Citibank to exit its custody business in
Argentina.
On April 7, 2015, Argentina asked Judge Griesa to hear a group of
eight class actions filed by certain holders of the country's
defaulted debt separately from the lawsuits brought by hedge fund
holdouts who acquired their bonds at a discount after Argentina
defaulted on its debt in 2001. Argentina asked Judge Griesa to deny
a request by the non-hedge fund classes to consider their cases
along with dozens of what are referred to in the bond dispute as
"me-too cases." Both bondholder groups are seeking the
benefit of Judge Griesa's 2012 rulings blocking Argentina from
paying holders of its restructured debt until it pays $1.7 billion
owed to the hedge fund holdouts.
On April 7, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
dismissed an appeal by Argentina of Judge Griesa's October 3,
2014, order holding the South American nation in contempt for
violating his 2012 injunction preventing the country from making
payments on restructured bonds without making corresponding
payments to holdout bondholders. A two-judge Second Circuit panel
dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, writing that
"[w]e conclude that a final order has not been issued by the
district court . . . and the collateral order doctrine does not
apply to this appeal."
Argentina's Economy Minister, Axel Kicillof, announced on April
8, 2015, that the Argentine government will seek an injunction
against Citibank in local Argentine courts for its role in the
March 20, 2015, agreement between Citibank and holdout bondholders
to permit certain one-time payments on Argentine-law bonds,
enabling Citibank to wind down its operations in Argentina without
violating U.S. district judge Griesa's orders. Kicillof,
however, provided few details with respect to either the nature of
the charges or the court in which the government will pursue its
case.
On April 20, 2015, Argentina announced that, in an effort to evade
U.S. restrictions on its market access, Argentina would issue $500
million of a new series of "BONAR 2024" bonds paying an
interest rate of 8.75 percent and maturing in nine years. On April
22, 2015, Judge Griesa ruled that the holdout bondholders suing
Argentina are entitled to disclosure of the details of the BONAR
2024 bond offering. Judge Griesa held that the hedge fund holdouts
can seek documents from Argentina and banks subscribing to the
offering, including Deutsche Bank AG and Banco Bilbao Vizcaya
Argentaria, S.A., related to the April 21, 2015, $1.4 billion bond
sale to determine whether any assets exist in the United States
which could satisfy billions of dollars in unpaid judgments against
Argentina.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.