A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for failing to adequately supervise a registered representative who engaged in unsuitable and excessive trading in the accounts of senior customers, in violation of FINRA Rules 2010 ("Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade") and 3110 ("Supervision").

FINRA determined that daily internal reports showed indicia of "unsuitable and excessive trading" in the accounts of senior customers: high turnover rates, and commissions and securities being purchased using margins. FINRA found that the broker-dealer failed to review the accounts of these impacted customers to determine whether the registered representative's trade recommendations had been suitable.

To settle the charges, the broker-dealer agreed to (i) pay $270,320 in restitution and $9,588 in interest, and (ii) a censure.

Primary Sources

  1. FINRA AWC: Coastal Equities, Inc.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

AUTHOR(S)
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Finance and Banking from United States
Kirschner: The Final Act?
Mayer Brown
On August 24, 2023, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its decision in the Kirschner v. JPMorgan litigation saga, rejecting the plaintiff's...
Financial Markets And Funds Quick Take | Issue 25
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Katten's Financial Markets and Funds Quick Take is a monthly newsletter highlighting key noteworthy developments potentially affecting financial markets and funds.
Implications Of An Early Extension Of A 364-Day Credit Facility
Mayer Brown
Because banks receive favorable capital treatment when a credit facility's tenor is shorter than one year, lenders increasingly offer financing with 364-day tenors and uncommitted extension option terms of up to 364 days.
Not Off The Hook: The SEC Addresses Its Position On Exculpation And Indemnification For Private Fund Advisers
Proskauer Rose LLP
In its final Private Fund Adviser Rules adopted last year, the SEC dropped one of the more controversial proposed rules—the proposal to prohibit contractual exculpation or indemnification...
Recent Pay-To-Play Settlement: Notwithstanding A Strong Dissent Over 206(4)-5 Overbreadth, The Need For Strong Compliance Policies Persists
WilmerHale
With political campaign activity ramping up as the fall elections approach, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has indicated it will continue stringent enforcement of Investment Advisers Act...
FDIC Updates Bank Merger Guidance To Include Non-Compete Ban
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
On March 21, 2024, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") approved a Federal Register notice seeking public...