Competition Policy International (CPI), Vol. 2, No. 1, Spring 2006, pp. 3-27. CPI is a peer-reviewed, academic journal (print ISSN 1554-0189; online ISSN 1554-6853) that covers competition law, economics, and policy. More information about CPI can be found at www.globalcompetitionpolicy.org.
Article Abstract
The success of the Areeda-Turner test for predatory pricing and the U.S. Supreme Court's adoption of demanding proof requirements in its 1993 Brooke Group decision have made it very difficult for plaintiffs to win conventional predatory pricing claims.
While many challenges to exclusionary pricing continue to be made, the legal theory has evolved away from classical predation to a variety of other theories. This paper examines the state of the law of both conventional predatory pricing and these recent variants and offers some recommendations.
Click here for a copy of the paper in its entirety
http://www.globalcompetitionpolicy.org/index.php?&id=90&action=907
Herbert Hovenkamp is the Ben V. & Dorothy Willie Professor of Law and History at the University of Iowa, College of Law.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
