Current filters:  
USA
IP
United States
Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider
Today, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") adopted a final rule (3-2) banning new non-compete agreements for both senior executives and non-senior executives.
Sideman & Bancroft
Starting and growing a beauty brand requires founders to weigh options and make urgent business decisions every day.
Michael Best & Friedrich
It's no secret that Hollywood has become enamored with rebooting classics from the 80's, using the same bankable leads and hoping to strike gold once again.
Gray Reed & McGraw LLP
In addition to being developed in-house, intellectual property ("IP") can obviously be acquired from third parties.
Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider
Two weeks ago we discussed Vanda Pharmaceuticals' ambitious cert petition asking the Supreme Court to discontinue the "reasonable expectation of success" standard for patent...
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In the digital age, fans have embraced the opportunity to put a spin on famous corporate logos. Reimagining logos may be a way for consumers to express a connection...
Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider
Following my colleagues' efforts in this series, this post examines the dissent/concurrence practice of the Commissioners at the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC)...
Venable LLP
On April 12, 2024, the Federal Circuit dismissed CAFC Appeal No. 24-1402 and Cross-Appeal No. 24-1405 for lack of jurisdiction following its February 22, 2024 order directing Regeneron and Mylan / Biocon.
Venable LLP
In patent litigation, damages issues are sometimes treated as an afterthought when compared to the issues of infringement and invalidity. However, achieving a client's goals...
Cowan Liebowitz & Latman PC
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) generally refuses to register the configuration of a product as a trademark when that the configuration either is functional or does not identify...
Foley & Lardner
For the first time in nearly 15 years, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued "Updated Guidance for Making a Proper Determination of Obviousness" under the U.S.
Winston & Strawn LLP
Google petitioned the Federal Circuit for a writ of mandamus, requesting that the Federal Circuit direct the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas to vacate its order denying Google's motion to transfer and transfer to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
WilmerHale
Prost, J. The Court affirmed the district court's indefiniteness determination but vacated and remanded its nonobviousness determination as to the asserted patent.
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
A glimpse into the future is possible by reviewing ICON's recent patent filings. The construction technology company was recently awarded a nearly $60-million NASA...
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)'s innovative Climate Change Mitigation Pilot Program makes 2024 the prime time for those creating climate-friendly...
Barnes & Thornburg
On March 27, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in Brumfield, Trustee for Ascent Trust v. IBG LLC,(1) clarifying the scope of potentially available...
Mintz
Pursuant to President Biden's October 2023 executive order on AI, on April 11, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO or Office)...
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In this special report, we review trends over time in PTAB post-grant appeals to the Federal Circuit.
WilmerHale
On April 10, 2024, the United States Patent and Trade Office (USPTO) announced guidance regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools before the USPTO.
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Under EU design patent law, novelty and individual character are two of the requirements to obtain EU Design protection. In order to show novelty, ...
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Popular Contributors
Upcoming Events
Mondaq Social Media