Luxembourg: Alta Energy Luxembourg S.A.R.L. V. The Queen

Last Updated: 23 September 2019
Article by Lorne Saltman

Alta Energy Luxembourg S.A.R.L. v. The Queen, 1 Case Study

On August 29, 2019, Canada ratified the Multilateral Convention To Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (the "Convention"). It is intended that the Convention will operate alongside Canada's bilateral tax treaties, 2 but will only apply to a particular bilateral tax treaty if both parties agree and instruments of ratification are deposited with the OECD.

Canada has agreed to modify the preamble to its tax treaties to include the following:

"Intending to eliminate double taxation with respect to taxes covered by this agreement without creating opportunities for non-taxation or reduced taxation through tax evasion or tax avoidance (including treaty-shopping arrangements aimed at obtaining reliefs provided in this agreement for the indirect benefit of residents of third jurisdictions). 3

The most controversial provision contains a specific anti-abuse rule as follows:

"Notwithstanding any provisions of a Covered Tax Agreement, a benefit under the Covered Tax Agreement shall not be granted in respect of an item of income or capital if it is reasonable to conclude: having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances, that obtaining that benefit was one of the principal purposes of any arrangement or transaction that resulted directly or indirectly in that benefit, unless it is established that granting that benefit in these circumstances would be in accordance with the object and purpose of the relevant provisions of the Covered Tax Agreement." 4

Presumably, the hope of the Canadian government is that the courts will apply these principles when examining a tax plan, rather than concluding the opposite, such as has been the case in Canada, for example in the recent Alta Energy case. 5

In 2011, the Blackstone Group LP, a major private equity fund, and Alta Resources LLC, an industry leader in shale oil and gas exploitation, formed a US LLC to develop a shale property in Northwest Canada. They incorporated a Canadian subsidiary of the LLC, Alta Energy Partners Ltd. ("Alta Canada"), to carry on the Canadian business. When it was determined that this structure was not favourable from a U.S. tax perspective, a reorganization was undertaken in 2012 (the "Reorganization") to transfer the shares of Alta Canada from the LLC to a Luxembourg holding company (the "Taxpayer").

During 2012 and 2013, Alta Canada acquired several drilling and exploration licenses and engaged in limited activities to find and develop productive shale oil deposits. However, in late 2013 the Taxpayer sold the shares of Alta Canada for proceeds of CAD$679,712,251, giving rise to a capital gain of nearly CAD$400 million.

The Taxpayer claimed an exemption from Canadian tax under Article 13(5) of the Canada-Luxembourg tax treaty (the "Treaty"). The Canada Revenue Agency (the "CRA") denied the exemption both on a technical treaty basis and under the general anti-avoidance rule ("GAAR").

Gains from the disposition of taxable Canadian property that is not treaty-protected property are included in a non-resident's taxable income in Canada under the Income Tax Act (Canada)(the "ITA"). Taxable Canadian property includes Canadian resource properties and shares of a private company that derive their principal value from Canadian resource properties. Treaty-protected property is property that is exempt from Canadian tax because of an exemption under a tax treaty entered into between Canada and another country.

Under the Treaty, Canada has the right to tax the capital gain realized by a Luxembourg resident if the shares sold are taxable Canadian property and not treaty-protected property. In this case, the share would be treaty-protected property for a resource property if the business of the Canadian corporation was carried on in that resource property.

The Tax Court of Canada interpreted the Treaty liberally, with a view to implementing the true intention of the parties, Canada and Luxembourg, who intended to exclude property developed in accordance with the industry's best practices. In this case, the oil and gas industry practice was to undertake preliminary drilling and testing of a reserve to establish its economic value before exploiting all of the property. The Court found this is what Alta Canada in fact did, and it rejected the more narrow view pressed upon it by the government's lawyers to the effect that if Alta Canada did not work to exploit each and every resource property under license to the maximum, the exclusion from taxation did not apply.

In doing so, the Court also took judicial notice of a publication by the CRA acknowledging that reserves are developed in Canada through active exploitation or kept for future exploitation. The government's lawyers were now unjustifiably contradicting that position, and taxpayers should be able to rely on stated positions of the CRA that take into account how reserves are developed in Canada.

The Court also ruled in favour of the Taxpayer on the GAAR assessment. While the Taxpayer conceded that the Reorganization was a tax benefit (to obtain the Treaty exemption), and that that it was not arranged primarily for a bona fide purpose other than to obtain the tax benefit, nevertheless, the parties disagreed on whether the avoidance transaction was abusive.

The government argued that the purpose of the Treaty was to prevent double taxation not to permit double non-taxation (capital gains in this case were not taxed in Luxembourg) . It also argued that the Taxpayer was a mere conduit for the Blackstone and other investors, as the proceeds of sale were immediately distributed to the Taxpayer's shareholders and the Taxpayer wound up after the sale. Finally, the government argued that the Reorganization amounted to prohibited "treaty shopping" and, therefore, it was abusive.

The Court held against the government on the first argument, finding that the wording of the Treaty did not contemplate a prohibition against double non-taxation. It also ruled in the Taxpayer's favour on the second argument, finding that the term conduit is meaningless in the absence of an agency or nominee relationship. Finally, the Court rejected the application of a rule against treaty shopping in the absence of a specific anti-treaty shopping rule in the Treaty

In light of Canada's recent ratification of the Convention, some commentators have speculated on what the outcome of a case similar to Alta Energy would be in the future. Arguably some guidance can be gleaned from this Court's finding that the purpose of the exemption from capital gains tax in the Treaty is to attract capital investments to Canada in a high-risk industry, which is exactly what happened in this case. Moreover, the purpose of entering into the Treaty was also to attract capital to Canada. As noted earlier, the notion in the principal purpose test of the Convention is that a tax benefit can be saved if it is established that granting the benefit in these circumstances would be in accordance with the object and purpose of the relevant provisions of the Covered Tax Agreement.

We are left with the question whether, in light of the Convention, the Canadian courts will remain suspicious of broad claims of treaty shopping.


1 2018 DTC 1120 (Tax Court of Canada). Under appeal to Federal Court of Appeal.

2 Of Canada's current list of 93 tax treaties in force, up to 75 are intended to be modified ("Covered Tax Agreements").

3 Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Schedule.

4 This provision denies the treaty benefit where the following three criteria are satisfied:

  • the benefit would otherwise result "directly or indirectly" from "any arrangement or transaction" [the result criterion]
  • "it is reasonable to conclude, having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances" that obtaining the benefit was "one of the principal purposes" of the arrangement or transaction [the principal purpose criterion]
  • it is not established that granting the benefit in these circumstances is in accordance with the object and purpose of the relevant provisions of the Covered Tax Agreement [the object and purpose criterion].

5 In an earlier case, The Queen v. MIL Investments S.A., 2007 DTC 5437 (Federal Court of Appeal), the court rejected the proposition that there was a general policy against treaty-shopping.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions