Taiwan: Taiwan IP Court's Jurisdiction Over Abroad E-Commerce Sites

In a recent decision, the Taiwan IP Court rendered a new perspective on the test of determining whether a Taiwan court has jurisdiction over a foreign defendant whose products are sold to Taiwan via its website. Hsu v. Village Vanguard, 107 Min-Zhu-Kang 1 (IP Court 2018). This second-instance decision held that, to determine whether personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant resides with a Taiwan court, the court should follow the general theory of jurisdiction in international law, taking into consideration all relevant factors including whether the foreign defendant can reasonably anticipate that Taiwan is one of its major markets or fields of activity.

Before Hsu

While Taiwan is a civil law country, no direct guidance is provided by any statutory law on how a court should decide whether it has jurisdiction over a dispute having a foreign element. This is an area where legislators intentionally remained silent and let the case law to prevail. Before Hsu, the dominant test courts had been adopting was the so-called "analogy theory." Under this theory, if any of the rules concerning national jurisdiction as provided in the Code of Civil Procedures, when being applied in an analogous way to the dispute (namely, with the dispute's foreign elements being put aside), can afford jurisdiction to a Taiwan court, then the court can take jurisdiction over that dispute, unless the court considers itself as an inappropriate forum to that dispute (or, in legal argot, forum non conveniens).

The rules for determining national jurisdictions in the Code of Civil Procedures can make a long list of legal Latin terms. These concisely-worded rules, many of them able to trace their lineage all the way back to the Roman law, sometimes have to be much stretched, or truncated, before being aptly applied or dis-applied to an abroad online IP dispute. The most problematic of all is the rule that says a court has jurisdiction if it is located within the place of a tort, including the place where the consequences of the tort occurs.

Consider the case of Hsu, where the alleged counterfeits (made in China) put on sale at a Japanese toy company's website indeed entered Taiwan's market due to Taiwan consumers' online purchases, and hence infringed the plaintiff's copyrights in Taiwan. At first glance, these facts could make Taiwan a place of the tortious result, per a literal reading of the rule. However, if the analogy approach is hence to be applied unconditionally, then the Japanese company, or any foreign company under like circumstances, will be subject to the IP Court's jurisdiction, however flimsy or incidental the Taiwan consumers' purchases may be. Evidently, to reach a meaningful decision, the court needs to add some limitation to the rule of the place of the tort; but the question is the rule itself is too concise to provide any textual support for inclusion of any substantial limitation.

Holdings in Hsu

The IP Court's decision in Hsu is groundbreaking as it held that the analogy approach should be abandoned. Instead, to determine whether the court can take jurisdiction over a dispute having a foreign element, the judges should follow the general theory of jurisdiction in international law. In other words, all relevant factors of a case shall be considered and weighed against each other under a case-by-case basis, with the place of tortious result being just one factor. Other factors to be considered include, to name a few, the defendant's residence, the place where the tort is committed, the place where the defendant's obligation if any should have been performed, the place where the defendant's property is located, and, last but not least, the defendant's reasonable anticipation that Taiwan is one of its major markets or fields of activity. The question of forum non conveniens, on the other hand, shall also be reviewed in light of this approach, and the factors to be considered include the convenience of investigation of evidence, effectiveness of the enforcement of judgment, and the substantive justice, among others.

What is highlighted in Hsu is the foreign defendant's reasonable anticipation (or forseeability), a factor which actually has no presence in any rules for national jurisdiction in the Code of Civil Procedures. According to Hsu, this factor shall be accorded additional (if not critical) weight when the defendant resides or the infringement is committed outside Taiwan. In an online infringement dispute, a defendant's foreseeability can be established by, for example, the facts that the defendant's website is operated in a country to which Taiwan has cultural and language affinity, and that citizens and netizens of the two countries have convenient and voluminous tourism and information exchange.

By cutting the Gordian knot, the IP Court bypassed the question of whether any rule of the Code of Civil Procedures should apply analogously so as to afford jurisdiction over an alleged online infringement the main activities of which seem to have nothing to do with Taiwan. As to the razor used by the court to solve this conundrum succinctly, it is exactly the defendant's foreseeability. As the evidence shows, although the whole-Japanese website posts an announcement saying it cannot process abroad purchase orders, a careful reading of the website reveals the opposite may be true. In some of the web-pages, viewers may find there are banners printed in Chinese, reading: "Foreign customers! please click here to purchase these goods through our agent." These banners not only explained how the alleged counterfeits were purchased from Taiwan but also justified the court's jurisdiction over this case, as the IP Court indicated:

"As the defendant is a famous large company in the toy industry, its website is widely loved by players, including players in Taiwan, a market having an affinity with Japan given the convenient transportation and cultural similarities. The banners at issue that invite viewers' entry to an associate website called 'Buyee', on the other hand, is placed at a conspicuous spot in the defendant's website, and is printed in Chinese. As such, the Japanese company must know, or at least can foresee, that Taiwan is one of its major markets. Granted, this court cannot exercise jurisdiction simply because the plaintiff (the copyright holder) is a national of Taiwan or because Taiwan is the place where the shipment is received; these facts alone do not make this Court qualify as a 'forum of the tortious result.' However, when we consider the defendant's knowledge or anticipation of Taiwan being its important e-commerce market, we believe this court can exercise jurisdiction over this dispute for being a forum of the tortious result."

It is worthy to note the IP Court's decision was issued after taking reference of a handful of amicus curiae filed in response to the court's call to the local IP community. It is generally believed that after Hsu, the IP Court will become more willing and better equipped to take jurisdiction over abroad e-commerce websites, especially those which have Chinese web-pages and whose operators are nationals of a country that may recognize and enforce a Taiwan court's judgment.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Sign Up
Gain free access to lawyers expertise from more than 250 countries.
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Newsalert
Select Topics
Select Regions
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions