Malaysia: The Inequality Of Dual Class Shares

Last Updated: 6 November 2018
Article by Sheba Gumis

Sheba Gumis explains the concepts underlying dual class shares.

Dual class shares have been the talk of investors in recent years with at least two major stock exchanges amending their rules to allow for dual class shares to be listed on their markets and to be more attractive to companies seeking listing.

Yet, dual class shares are relatively unknown to the Malaysian layperson, given that such shares are not allowed to be listed on Bursa Malaysia. Notwithstanding this, the concept of dual class shares has existed since the early 1920s in America.

Dual class shares refer to the issuing of various types of shares by a single company. A dual class share structure can consist of Class A and Class B shares, for example. These classes of shares would possess different traits, which would usually be based on differing voting rights and possibly, economic benefits.

WHY DUAL CLASS SHARES?

Dual class shares are issued primarily to ensure that a select group of shareholders control the management of the company in excess of their capital contribution to the company while still being able to access the capital market. For example, Class A shares would hold 10 votes each, whereas Class B shares hold 1 vote each. Class A shares would only be issued to certain people, e.g. the founders of the company, whereas Class B shares would be issued to members of the public. By doing so, the Class A shareholders' votes would outweigh those of the Class B shareholders. The company would still be able to seek funds from the public without the Class A shareholders giving up control of their company.

This structure was previously implemented in family-owned companies, such as the previous Dodge Brothers' Company, which is credited to be the first listed company in the United States to adopt a dual class share structure, and media companies, such as The New York Times Company. Media companies implemented this structure to protect editorial independence, whereas family-owned companies wanted to ensure that only members of the family controlled the company.

However, the current trend is for technology companies to adopt the dual class share structure, with companies such as Google and Facebook implementing the same. The reason technology companies require such a structure is to ensure that the management has control of the company in order to implement long-term goals of the company. This is more beneficial to the company in the long run as compared to control being placed in the hands of the public shareholders who may have shorter term goals and be interested only in short term profits.

WHO IMPLEMENTS DUAL CLASS SHARE STRUCTURES?

Since its introduction in the 1920s, the number of listed companies in the United States which have adopted the dual class share structure has increased to 701, with 214 being listed in the 10-year period ending in 2015 (Report on Dual Class and Other Entrenching Governance Structures in Public Companies dated 27 February 2018 by the Investor as Owner Subcommittee of the Securities Exchange Commission). These companies range from family-owned companies, conglomerates to technology companies.

Family-owned companies, such as Ford Motor Company, implemented the dual class share structure to retain control of the company within the family. The Fords collectively own less than 2% of the shares in the company, but control 40% of the total voting power.

In the case of The New York Times Company, holders of Class A shares are entitled to elect 30% of the board members whilst the family trust and members of the Sulzberger family, the sole holders of Class B shares, are entitled to elect 70% of the board members.

Berkshire Hathaway Inc, the renowned conglomerate helmed by investment guru, Warren Buffett, has two classes of shares. Its Class B shares have 1/200th of the votes of its Class A shares.

Social media giant, Facebook, has two classes of shares - Class A shares issued to members of the public, and Class B shares held by Mark Zuckerberg and other insiders of Facebook. The Class B shares carry 10 votes each, whilst the Class A shares carry 1 vote each.

ADDING MORE TO THE MIX

Innovation did not stop at dual class shares. In fact, certain stock exchanges allow companies to issue more than two classes of shares.

Alphabet Inc (Google's parent company), which is listed on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations Exchange (NASDAQ), has issued triple class shares, namely Class A shares (bearing 1 vote each and issued to members of the public), Class B shares (bearing 10 votes each and issued to the company's management and early investors) and Class C shares (bearing no votes and issued to employees of the company).

Snap Inc's listing on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) was particularly noteworthy. Apart from the fact that it issued triple class shares, the company pushed the envelope further by issuing Class A non-voting shares to the public. Class B shares, which carry 1 vote each, were issued to the management and early investors, whereas Class C shares, which carry 10 votes each, were issued to the company's co-founders, Evan Spiegel and Bobby Murphy. Control therefore lies only in the hands of Snap Inc's co-founders, the management and early investors.

DUAL SENTIMENTS ON DUAL CLASS SHARES

The jury is still out on whether the dual class share structure is beneficial. There are compelling arguments on both sides.

The advocates of the dual class share structure argue that the structure ensures that executives are able to focus on long term plans and that the retention of control within a select group of people allows for strong leadership.

It also encourages technology companies and family-owned companies to take the companies public and enjoy funding from the capital markets. It is a win-win situation for small investors who do not have any interest in managing a company, but wish to enjoy the profits of such company.

On a more jurisprudential aspect, proponents of the dual class share structure argue that based on the doctrine of freedom of contract, parties should be free to decide on the terms of their investment, even if it means that the investors do not have equal voting rights in respect of their shares.

There are also valid arguments against the dual class share structure. On a base level, it can be argued that the dual class share structure is undemocratic. It is only fair that if you invest in 50% of the shares of the company, you should control 50% of the management as well. The public investors are given unequal treatment in that they bear the brunt of the economic risk without enjoying management control of the company.

Additionally, the dual class share structure perpetuates control of the company in a small group of investors and may result in complacency and reduce accountability by an entrenched management. If the investors who control the company are capable, the company and the public investors would benefit. However, if they are incompetent, the public investors would not be able to step in to change the direction of the company as they lack the voting power to do so.

This could also lead to a problem in family-controlled companies, which is known as the "idiot heir problem". Should the shares with control be bequeathed to incompetent heirs, the company will then be managed by incompetent leaders and the public shareholders would not be in a position to oust such heirs. These "idiot heirs" may also be prone to abuse their power in the company.

An interesting development in recent years is the attempt by activist investors in the United States to compel companies having dual class shares, such as Ford Motor Company, to convert their dual class shares into a single class of shares. Although these attempts have been unsuccessful, this development reflects the growing trend of investor activism in the United States.

REGULATING DUAL CLASS SHARE LISTINGS

The NYSE, NASDAQ, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) and the Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX) are among the stock exchanges that allow for the listing of dual or multiple class shares. However, these exchanges acknowledge that such structures need to be regulated for the benefit and protection of investors.

The NYSE and NASDAQ (the latter being the leading listing destination for technology companies) both have uniform rules prohibiting the reduction of voting rights of existing shares and the issuance of a new class of superior voting shares. They also allow listed companies to have more than two classes of shares.

Companies with dual class shares are allowed to list on the HKEX only if they are "innovative companies". The rationale for dual class shares must be justified. Examples of innovative companies provided in the HKEX's guidance are as follows: (i) the company's success is attributable to the application of new technologies, innovations, and/or a new business model, to its core business; (ii) research and development is a significant contributor to the company's expected value and constitutes a major activity and expense; (iii) the company's success is attributable to its unique features and/or intellectual property; and/or (iv) the company has an outsized market capitalisation / intangible asset value relative to its tangible asset value.

The HKEX also requires a minimum market capitalisation of HK$40 billion or alternatively, HK$10 billion if the company has achieved a revenue of at least HK$1 billion in its most recent audited financial year. It does not permit the shares with enhanced voting rights to be listed and limits the ratio of such rights to a maximum of 10 times the voting rights attached to ordinary shares. Further, future equity capital raisings must not increase the proportion of shares with enhanced voting rights to ordinary shares.

The HKEX seeks to protect the interests of investors by stipulating that each share (irrespective of class) shall have 1 vote for reserved matters, namely amendments to the constitution, variation of class rights, appointment or removal of independent directors and auditors, and winding-up of the company.

Although the HKEX listing rules do not expressly permit companies to have more than two classes of shares, it appears that multi-class share structures may be permitted on a case-by-case basis.

SGX allows dual class share listing for companies with a minimum market capitalisation of SGD300 million. The enhanced voting rights are capped at 10 votes per share. Similar to the HKEX, SGX also safeguards the interests of investors by ensuring that each share (regardless of class) has 1 vote for specified matters, such as appointment and removal of directors and auditors, variation of rights, reverse takeovers and winding-up or delisting of the company. Additionally, there is a requirement for the multi-vote shares to have sunset clauses, i.e. that they will automatically convert into ordinary shares in circumstances which the company must stipulate at the time of its initial public offering.

WHAT ABOUT MALAYSIA?

Bursa Malaysia has confirmed that there are no current plans to facilitate the listing of dual class shares (The Star, 12 August 2017).

If Bursa Malaysia intends to follow suit in allowing for the listing of dual class shares, numerous amendments would need to be made to its listing requirements. It is likely that the Companies Act 2016 would need to be amended as Section 71(1)(c) stipulates that each share shall have one vote on a poll.

Further, Bursa Malaysia would have to consider whether to introduce measures to protect the interests of the public investors while ensuring that its regulatory regime remains attractive and competitive as compared to those of other stock exchanges.

CONCLUSION

Dual class share structures seem to be the way forward to attract more listings, notwithstanding the numerous arguments against it. It will be up to the stock exchanges to provide a balanced regulatory regime which is enticing enough for companies to list their dual class share structure on, and at the same time safeguard the interests of the public who intend to invest in the same.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions