Venezuela: Acting Maliciously?

Last Updated: 17 October 2018
Article by Elizabeth Turnbull

The question of whether drug smuggling was a malicious act has been tested in the UK's Supreme Court.

It is widely acknowledged that trading in certain parts of the world carries with it particular risks, such as piracy, political uncertainty, social instability, corruption or drug trafficking. Colombia and surrounding countries, such as Venezuela, carry a particularly large risk in relation to drug smuggling where, despite the fact that law enforcement agencies have tightened up security to prevent smugglers from attaching drug-filled containers to ships, traffickers continue to regard ocean carriers as a cheap and relatively risk-free way to move their product internationally. All that is required is to find a way to attach the drugs to the hull of the vessel in one port and to retrieve them in the desired destination. The involvement of the captain or the crew is neither necessary nor, in fact, desired.

In August 2007, the vessel B Atlantic loaded a cargo of coal in Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela, for discharge in Italy.

As had happened to a number of other unfortunate vessels in the same period (African Future, Christopher Oldendorff, IDC-1 and Yeoman Brook, to name a few), prior to sailing, a routine underwater inspection revealed that a cache of drugs had been strapped to the ship's hull. In this case, three bags containing 132 kg of cocaine were found 10 m below the waterline.

Neither the owners nor the crew were implicated in the drug smuggling. This did not, however, prevent the Venezuelan authorities from detaining the vessel indefinitely and arresting the crew under the country's strict 2005 Anti-Drug Law, which provides that any person who illicitly traffics or transports drugs by any means will be punished with a prison sentence.

The law was implemented in such a way that crews were arrested for drug trafficking even if they themselves had alerted the authorities to the fact that drug smugglers were in the process of attaching drugs to the hold of their vessel (as in the case of IDC-1).

Eventually, in August 2010, the Venezuelan courts sentenced the master and second officer to nine years in prison for complicity in the drug trafficking. They also ordered the continued detention of B Atlantic.

In the intervening period, the owners served a notice of abandonment of the vessel on 18 June 2008 and presented their war risk insurers, Navigators, with a claim for the constructive total loss of their vessel, on the basis of the authorities' detention for longer than the six months' period provided for in clause 3 of the Institute War and Strike Clauses 1/10/83 as amended (the Institute Clauses). Navigators, however, rejected the claim on the basis that it was excluded under the terms of the policy.


The key provisions in the policy were the following:

Clause 1.5: "Subject always to the exclusions hereinafter referred to, this insurance covers loss of or damage to the vessel caused by ... any terrorist or any person acting maliciously or from a political motive."

Clause 4.1.5: "This insurance excludes ... arrest, restraint, detainment, confiscation or expropriation ... by reason of infringement of any customs or trading regulations ..."

Essentially, the Institute Clauses provide, under clause 1.5, that loss or damage caused by malicious acts are covered under the policy, and, separately, specify that loss or damage linked to customs or trading regulation infringement are specifically excluded under clause 4.1.5.

High Court

At first instance, the insurers were found liable for the owners' losses of US$22 million.

Flaux J ruled that the cause of the vessel's loss was the malicious act of unknown third parties attaching drugs to the hull. The detention of the vessel effectively resulted from the malicious act of the drug smugglers and this was an insured peril pursuant to clause 1.5.

The standard exclusion, under clause 4.1.5, which is triggered in cases of infringement of any customs regulation, was held not to apply where the infringement was no more than the "mere manifestation" of the third party's malicious act. Clause 4.1.5 was to be read subject to an implied limitation that applied where the only reason for an infringement was such a malicious act.

Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal disagreed with Flaux J and reached the opposite conclusion. The appeal judges (Laws and Christopher Clarke LJJ, and Sir Timothy Lloyd) ruled unanimously in favour of the insurers, finding that cover was indeed subject to the exclusion, and that no basis existed for introducing an implied limitation such as Flaux J had suggested.

The shipowners' claim for constructive total loss of the vessel and sue and labour expenses resulted from both the concealment of the cocaine and the subsequent detention of the vessel by the authorities.

The act of concealment was the malicious act and therefore a covered peril under clause 1.5; however, the subsequent detention by the authorities, for infringement of customs regulations, had the effect of triggering the policy exclusion under clause 4.1.5. In the words of Christopher Clarke LJ: "If the malicious act is the concealment of drugs on the vessel and the concealment of drugs is an infringement of the customs regulations, the vessel will have been detained by reason of an infringement of the customs regulations."

The shipowners' claim failed accordingly. The case subsequently landed at the doorstep of the Supreme Court which had to decide whether the vessel had sustained a loss by an insured peril which would entitle the owners to recover the vessel's insured value from their insurers, and, at the same time, examine the effect of exclusion clause 4.1.5 on the claim.

Supreme Court

In Atlasnavios-Navegação Lda v Navigators Insurance Co Ltd (The B Atlantic) [2018] 2 Lloyd's Rep 1, the judges (sitting in a panel comprising Lords Mance (DP), Sumption, Hughes, Hodge and Briggs) examined closely the wording of the Institute Clauses to determine the application of clauses 1.5 and 4.1.5, and their interaction.

The Supreme Court, as a starting point, decided to re-examine the parties' common ground that the third party's attempt to smuggle drugs via the vessel involved the parties acting maliciously and thereby permitting the owners to claim under clause 1.5. The judges wanted to ensure that they were not proceeding on the basis of a false premise.

Contrary to the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court ruled that the attempt to smuggle drugs out of the country by attaching them to the hull of the vessel, was not in itself a malicious act because that act was not "motivated by malice".

The five judges unanimously held that the unidentified perpetrators' intent had been to illegally traffic the cocaine haul and not to provoke the detention of the vessel.

For the smugglers to be found to have acted "maliciously", it would have been necessary for "an element of spite, ill-will or the like" to have been present in their actions. The Court went on: "This is not a case where the attempted smuggling can be regarded as having been aimed at the detention, or constructive total loss of, or any loss or damage to the vessel or any property or person."

In fact, the discovery of the haul of cocaine, and the subsequent long-term detention of the vessel, were precisely the opposite of what the smugglers were intending to happen.

On this reasoning, no malice attached to the event. The Supreme Court concluded that clause 1.5 was not adequate to cover the claim and this was sufficient to dismiss the appeal.

Owners could have claimed under the alternative clauses 1.2 (on the grounds of restraint/detainment) and 3 (detainment leading to constructive total loss) but in any event, the detention would have resulted from the infringement of customs regulations and, on that basis, the clause 4.1.5 exclusion would have been brought into operation.

The Supreme Court went on to examine the position had the premise of a malicious act been correct and took the view that even if it had been possible to consider the loss as caused by a person acting maliciously, cover under clause 1.5 would still have been excluded by clause 4.1.5 for customs regulations infringement.


The Supreme Court, in this case, shines a light on the concept of malicious act under clause 1.5 of the Institute Clauses, as well as the interplay between insured perils under clause 1.5 and exclusion clause 4.1.5. The decision makes it clear that the constructive total loss of a vessel, resulting from its long-term detention by authorities for drug trafficking or contraband offences, is an excluded risk under the Institute Clauses.

This comes as a salutary warning to shipowners to review the terms of their war risks insurance policy and, where such cover is lacking, arrange additional insurance to protect their position – especially if their vessel is going to trade in a high-risk region such as Latin America.

This article was first published in Maritime Risk International, September 2018 issue.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Elizabeth Turnbull
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions