UCITS ESMA Q&A: Update May 2018

EH
ELVINGER HOSS PRUSSEN, société anonyme

Contributor

Independent in structure and spirit, Elvinger Hoss Prussen guides clients on their most critical Luxembourg legal matters. Committed to excellence and creativity in legal practice, our firm delivers the best possible advice for businesses, institutions and entrepreneurs, playing a unique role in the development of Luxembourg as a financial centre.
In May 2018, ESMA added a question on the disclosure of remuneration of delegates in its Q&A on the application of the UCITS Directive
Luxembourg Corporate/Commercial Law

In May 2018, ESMA added a question on the disclosure of remuneration of delegates in its  Q&A on the application of the UCITS Directive. In its answer, ESMA takes the same position as the one taken in the case of delegation by an AIFM (see our Newsletter December 2017). ESMA clarifies that the remuneration-related disclosure requirements under Article 69(3) (a) of the UCITS Directive also apply to the staff of the delegate of an AIFM to whom portfolio management or risk management activities have been delegated. In line with the approach followed under the UCITS Remuneration Guidelines, ESMA provides for two different ways of complying with this requirement.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More