Singapore: Approval For Super Priority Rescue Financing - What Does An Applicant Need To Show A Singapore Court?

Last Updated: 12 December 2017
Article by Herman Jeremiah and Kia Jeng Koh

A case study of Re: Attilan Group Ltd [2017] SGHC 283


For the first time, the Singapore High Court has ruled on whether to grant 'super priority' for debts arising from rescue financing under the amended insolvency laws via the Companies (Amendment) Act 2017 (the Act). 'Super priority' was one of the central topics discussed in Dentons Rodyk's series of seminars for financial institution clients held in September 2017 over 3 days.

These provisions were inspired by the Chapter 11 bankruptcy process in the United States, allowing for "Debtor-In-Possession" (DIP) financing to be arranged by a company under the United States Bankruptcy Code 11 USC (Chapter 11) bankruptcy process.

In its decision, the Singapore High Court declined to grant priority status to funds to be advanced to the Attilan Group, finding that the applicant must first expend reasonable efforts to seek out non-priority sources of financing (and provide supporting evidence thereof), before seeking super priority rescue financing.

Below, we discuss the implications of the High Court's decision in Re: Attilan Group Ltd [2017] SGHC 283 (Re: Attilan) for companies seeking 'super priority' for debts arising from rescue financing.  

Background & Executive Summary

The Singapore Parliament recently made extensive changes to Singapore's insolvency laws via the Companies (Amendment) Act 2017 (the Act). The amendments are part of Singapore's efforts to make it an international debt restructuring hub and include mechanisms to 'supercharge' scheme of arrangements, facilitate easier access to judicial management, and enhance moratoriums against creditors – all of which are intended to aid companies trying to navigate out of deep debt.

In September 2017, Dentons Rodyk conducted a seminar series over 3 days for financial institution clients which touched on these recent changes, where leading insolvency experts from Dentons US, UK and Australia provided a comparative perspective of the laws and shared their "war stories" from their jurisdictions.  

One of the central provisions discussed during the Dentons Rodyk seminars was section 211E of the Companies Act (Cap. 50) relating to super priority for debts arising from rescue financing. Now, in Re: Atillan, the Singapore High Court has provided guidance to this new provision where the applicant sought, inter alia, for proposed rescue financing to be given super priority in the event of the applicant's winding up. This case is notable for being the first reported case on section 211E and provides an insight into how the Singapore court will approach this new provision in the future.

After considering both the parties' submissions, as well as taking guidance from similar provisions in, and US cases relating to Chapter 11, the High Court declined to grant super priority to the proposed rescue financing.

The Applicant must expend reasonable effort to seek out less disruptive sources of financing

In Re: Attilan, Attilan Group Limited (the Applicant) sought for sums to be disbursed by a subscriber under a subscription agreement to be treated as rescue financing and be afforded super priority over other creditors' claims (in the event of a winding up). The Applicant sought this in conjunction with a scheme of arrangement which would turn around its poor financial status. Phillip Asia Pacific Opportunity Fund Ltd, one of its creditors, (Phillip Asia) opposed both the scheme and the application for super priority.

The Honourable Justice Aedit Abdullah, notwithstanding Phillip Asia's opposition to the scheme to be put to the creditors, allowed the calling of a meeting of the Applicant's creditors to consider the scheme.  However, the learned Judge rejected the application for super priority on several grounds. Most notably, the learned Judge noted that while the Companies Act was silent on the necessary standard of proof, the court "must be sufficiently satisfied on a balance of probabilities that there is a basis" to grant the application. In this regard, the company making the application must put forth evidence that it has taken reasonable efforts to attempt to secure financing that would not be disruptive to the expected priority of creditors.

In other words, a company must

  1. first try to obtain financing without super priority terms and
  2. show in evidence that it has done so. Mere allegations or unsubstantiated assertions would hold no water with the Court.

The learned Judge further explained that having a requirement for hard evidence was grounded in policy, due to the disruptive nature of a successful super priority application.

Applying the above to the facts of Re: Attilan, the learned Judge agreed with Phillip Asia in that the Applicant had failed to show adequate evidence of any efforts, let alone reasonable efforts, being expended by it to secure funding without any super priority. While it was accepted on the face of the Applicant's affidavit that the Applicant had indeed entered into discussions and negotiations to seek out financing, it was not obvious that these negotiations were in respect of financing without super priority terms. There was no concrete evidence adduced, such as correspondence with financial institutions clearly indicating rejection or negotiation.

As such, it was correctly deduced that it would be "next to impossible" for the court to determine whether the Applicant had access to other funds without tangible evidence being produced. On a separate note, the learned Judge rejected the Applicant's argument that its unstable financial position made it pointless to even attempt to search for other sources of financing.

On the basis of the above, the learned Judge declined to grant super priority status to the proposed rescue financing.

Possible guidance from US law

The learned Judge made numerous references to the provisions of Chapter 11 and to US case law, which may provide us with further guidance as to how Singapore courts will be approaching the new section 211E. For instance, the case of In re Western Pacific was raised by Phillip Asia and considered by the learned Judge in the judgment. In that case, it was held that in order for the court to give super priority to a debt, four conditions had to be fulfilled: (a) the proposed financing has to be in the exercise of sound and reasonable business judgment; (b) no alternative financing is available on any other basis; (c) such financing is in the best interest of the creditors; and (d) no better offers, bids or timely proposals are before the court. Although the learned Judge considered these factors largely irrelevant to Re: Attilan, he did acknowledge that they could potentially be relevant considerations in future cases involving super priority applications.

What is clear from this judgment is that the Singapore Court will chart its own course although US caselaw "...could be helpful in illuminating the appropriate construction of the newly enacted provisions in the CA concerning rescue financing...". The learned Judge emphasized that "...the US authorities and doctrine are referred to only as a useful guide as [Singapore] develop[s] our own law in this area. [The Singapore court] may stick close to the US position, or we may depart from it: much will depend on the arguments put before us."

Implications and Lessons Learnt

There are three key lessons which should inform future efforts by companies to obtain 'super priority' rescue financing.

  1. As we highlighted at our September 2017 seminar series, US caselaw will be highly persuasive but the Singapore Court, bearing in mind the differences between the US Chapter 11 regime and what has been introduced in Singapore, will chart its own course.This was the approach taken by the learned Judge in Re: Attilan.
  2. It is common for courts to ask: where is the evidence?This is amplified in this case where the Court held that: "the grant of super priority should not ordinarily be resorted to and the courts would be slow to do so unless it is strictly necessary". Would-be creditors and distressed companies would do well to keep this in mind, and should exercise due care and diligence in making sure that all reasonable options are exhausted before super priority rescue financing is sought. If it is truly the case that no practical options remain, parties would do well to adduce clear contemporaneous documentary evidence to this effect in their applications.Bare assertions will not meet the mark.
  3. Potential applicants should further note the comments of the learned Judge at [56] of the judgment:

"some thought should be given by applicants to the appropriate type or level of super priority sought, and they should also be prepared to provide the rationale for what they seek". In the same vein, potential applicants should specify right at the start of proceedings which limb of section 211E they are relying on; it is important to do because any opposing creditor can then formulate its submissions accordingly.

Ultimately, thorough planning and effort must be expended before a company applies to court for super priority, given its impact on all stakeholders. Singapore courts have made it clear they will not simply rubber-stamp an applicant's proposal. 

Dentons Rodyk acknowledges and thanks associate Ashwin Nair for his contribution to the article.

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
23 Jan 2019, Seminar, Los Angeles, United States

Dentons is pleased to offer a full day of classes, just in time for the California MCLE compliance period deadline of January 31, 2019.*

24 Jan 2019, Other, New York, United States

Join Dentons’ Health Care Partner Lori Mihalich-Levin and White Collar & Government Investigations Counsel Christine Genaitis as they lead conference sessions at AHLA Academic Medical Centers and Teaching Hospitals Institute.

30 Jan 2019, Other, Chicago, United States

Please join us on January 30, 2019, for the Fifth Annual Courageous Counsel Leadership Institute. This year's theme is "Risk and reward: Creating a culture that promotes innovation, change and growth.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions