United Arab Emirates: Should I Proceed In Dubai Or UK For divorce?

Last Updated: 8 June 2017
Article by Byron James

In the NatWest "Quality of Life" index, the UAE and Dubai are ranked second only to Singapore, outranking all other typical expatriate locations such as Australia, New Zealand and Spain. There are a number of good reasons for this, and it isn't all about beach parties and sunshine. Perhaps it is the quality of life, or just a general sense of adventure, that has resulted in 240,000 British nationals currently living in Dubai, including the writer of this article, with this number increasing all the time.

Consequently, the interaction between UK family law and Dubai is becoming increasingly relevant. There is something about the sunshine and lifestyle that leads those expatriated to Dubai to consider the benefits of consulting a family lawyer on a somewhat more regular basis than normal. Dubai has been mentioned more in the last three years' family law reports than ever before. It was in 2001 that Thorpe LJ in Al Habtoor v Fotheringham [2001] 1 FLR 951 referred to the 'particularly close historical connection' that the UK has with the UAE, was described therein as a 'friendly foreign state' and 'orders issued by the Emirates are entitled to the regard which we would expect the courts of the Emirates to have for our orders'.

It was only a matter of time before the divorce process in Dubai came under some scrutiny in the English Courts.

It is a question that those advising in Dubai come across regularly: whether a client should pursue a divorce in the UAE rather than the UK? Whilst a jurisdiction race wouldn't ensue per se as the European principle of lis pendens via Article 12 of the EU Maintenance Regulation would not apply, nevertheless there remains good reason for a divorcing party to be the first to start proceedings and to try to secure their choice of jurisdiction.

A forum conveniens argument between the UK and the UAE would be an interesting intellectual exercise but is likely to be informed by the facts of the case and the specific orders being sought. There is within UAE financial remedies law a demonstration of the law of unintended consequences, as the UAE remains one of the most pro-woman jurisdictions in the world where the wife is the richer party. An order will not be made for the wife to pay an amount to the husband, irrespective of the care given to the children. However, conversely, a more impoverished wife will do worse in the UAE than in the UK, largely because the UAE courts' approach is needs driven and does not extend to an application of the sharing principle. Dubai is also one of those jurisdictions, given the nature and limitations of the court's powers in financial remedies, where it is hard to escape the prospect of a Part III, MFPA 1984 claim: the more unfair the outcome, the fewer assets untouched by the regime, the more likely one will be to obtain permission under that statute.

In answering whether a client should pursue a divorce in the UAE, one is therefore concerned with both the likely financial award following that divorce (and consequential impact upon a forum conveniens argument) but also whether the divorce procedure in the UAE is likely to be given recognition in England. Following the decision of Mostyn J in Lachaux v Lachaux [2017] EWHC 385 those advising clients as to the possible advantages and disadvantages of a divorce in Dubai now have a much clearer picture on this question.

The divorce law in the UAE is split between those applicable to Muslims and those pertaining to non-Muslims. The creation of the Federal Law No. 28 of 2005 on Personal Status, Article 1(2) created a regime applicable to non-Muslim citizens of the UAE rendering the common misunderstanding that only Sharia Law which is applied. Article 2(1) provides that 'the principles and rules of the Muslim doctrine shall be consulted' when 'understanding, interpreting or consulting the legislative provisions' of the law but that remains a long way from simply only applying Sharia Law, as a form of secular divorce is provided for within Article 117.

In Lachaux this secular divorce process was found to be 'not dissimilar to our own fault based divorce ground found in section 1(2)(b), Matrimonial Causes Act 1973' by Mostyn J (para 14). Although, it should be noted in passing that it remains to be seen how much longer this fault based proximity between the UAE and UK remains, with Resolution's compelling and persuasive campaign for divorce law to be reformed to a no-fault system.

Mostyn J astutely takes the word 'prejudice' within the Article to 'mean the same as behaviour as it used in our own Matrimonial Causes Act' (para 14). With this substitution, it is clear why his Lordship found there to be such proximity, Article 117 provides:

"Each of the two spouses is entitled to ask for divorce due to prejudice that would make the continuity of the friendly companionship between them impossible. The right of each of the spouses thereto shall not be forfeited unless their reconciliation is established."

This has clear echoes of proving irretrievable breakdown by proving one of the five facts, as per the UK system.

One of the questions posed by the Lachaux case pertained to the status of the Dubai divorce and whether it was 'entitled to be recognised' (para 22). If it was not then the decrees nisi and absolute were to be set aside, which his Lordship was in no doubt he had the power to do. Mostyn J stated that where 'there was no question as to the court's power to entertain the divorce suit a party cannot appeal a decree absolute to the Court of Appeal if he or she had time and opportunity to appeal against the preceding decree nisi' however conversely in the present situation the restriction on appealing a decree absolute set out in section 18, Senior Courts Act 1981 'has nothing to do with setting aside a decree which is null and void'.

The legal framework which exists when considering whether a divorce is entitled to recognition is determined by Part II, Family Law Act 1986. Section 46(1)(a) provides that the validity of a divorce will be recognised if the divorce was 'effective under the law of the country in which it was obtained' and that (by section 46(1)(b)) at the relevant date either party was habitually resident or domiciled or a national of that country.

Section 48 sets out the 'proof of facts' required to decide 'whether an overseas divorce ... is entitled to recognition by virtue of section 46'. Effectively this means that, 'conclusive evidence' will be deemed to have been provided if 'both parties to the marriage took part in the proceedings' and 'sufficient proof unless the contrary is shown'.

Even if one satisfies the section 46 and 48 tests, it is still possible to challenge the validity of the divorce under section 51(3). Mostyn J describes it as 'an open question' as to whether section 48 applies to an enquiry under section 51 and indicates that in his opinion it does not 'as a refusal of recognition would be pursuant to section 51 and not section 46' and 'by its terms section 48 is limited to recognitions'. Section 51 provides for a challenge to the validity (accordingly, therefore, separately to section 46) where a divorce was obtained without steps having been taken to give notice of the proceedings to the other party (section 51(3)(a)(i)) or where there are other reasons for the other party to the marriage not being given sufficient opportunity to take part in the proceedings (section 51(3)(a)(ii)).

It was not contended in Lachaux that the divorce was not effective in Dubai and it therefore satisfied the sections 46 and 48 aspect of the enquiry and so 'the divorce was entitled to be recognised, unless the applicant can prove a case under section 51(3)' (para 28).

Mostyn J referred to a 'general reluctance' in the case law to bring about a 'limping marriage... where the parties are married in one place but divorced in another' but didn't go as far as to say that this was a general principle: he found the enquiry to be 'evaluative rather than discretionary' (para 29). The general principle His Lordship preferred being that if the enquiry leads to the conclusion that notice was not given but was reasonable to have been given then recognition should be refused (Ibid). Refusal will equally follow where an opportunity to participate was also denied unduly. It is also worth noting that following Golubovich v Golubovich [2010] 2 FLR 1614, a breach of public policy will also lead to refusal if proved under section 51(3)(c)

Following a lengthy judgment on the facts of the case, Mostyn J found that the applicant 'had knowledge of the proceedings in Dubai and a full opportunity to participate in them' (para 143). He specifically found that the wife had participated in them. He found that 'the proceedings were fair' and the Dubai Court gave the Applicant 'much latitude' (Ibid). The Applicant did not 'even begin to scratch the surface of demonstrating that this UAE divorce is contrary to English and Welsh public policy'.

Interestingly, Mostyn J went further and stated that: 'on the contrary, I am entirely satisfied that the divorce ground under Article 117 is entirely consistent with our public policy as it is virtually the same as the ground for divorce that is principally used here'.

The Dubai divorce was therefore recognised as valid and Mostyn J declined to refuse recognition of it under section 51(3) and he set aside the English decrees nisi and absolute as void.

This is an important decision for those working with family law cases in the UAE and the UK. It is submitted that it is a direct and specific endorsement of the UAE divorce system, the validity of which must now be hard to challenge on public policy grounds following the decision and, in fact, was found specifically to be very similar to the UK. When advising clients as to whether to proceed in the UAE or the UK, one question appears to have been properly and conclusively answered; focus can be concentrated instead in that decision on the different financial outcomes and potential forum conveniens arguments which will inform which jurisdiction is preferable.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions