It’s that time of the year again – Christmas parties
and work socials galore. That heady mix of festive spirit and
copious amounts of free alcohol. Add in work colleagues and things
can get a little bit sticky. As some employers have learned the
hard way, there is a fine line between the point at which a work
event ends and a private social event begins.
Where mishaps do occur, employers could inadvertently find
themselves vicariously liable for the actions of their
An employer can be held responsible for the actions of employees
“in the course of employment”. The employees actions
must be “so closely connected with [the] employment that it
would be fair and just to hold the employers vicariously
Whether something is done “in the course of
employment” is highly fact sensitive, which is demonstrated
by some of the seemingly conflicting case law in this area of
Bellman v Northampton Recruitment Ltd 
In this recent case, a manager assaulted a director after a
Christmas party, causing him serious brain injury. As is not
uncommon, after the Christmas party, a group of employees carried
on the night with another drink at a hotel nearby. The relevant
assault took place at the hotel at 3am. The High Court held that
the employer was not vicariously liable, as the employee’s
actions were not sufficiently connected to his employment. The
Court considered that the after-party was a private event as it had
taken place in a different venue to the work Christmas party, a
significant period of time had passed since the party had ended, it
was not pre-planned and the employer was not paying for the
Livesey v. Parker Merchanting Ltd 
By contrast, on a similar set of facts, the employer in this
case was found vicariously liable for the actions of its employee
who sexually assaulted a colleague after a work Christmas party.
The distinguishing fact was that the assault occurred in the car on
the way home, immediately after the party. The Court found that the
conduct in question was a continuation of sexual harassment by the
employee at the work event and, as such, was in the course of
What can employers do to mitigate some of the risks?
The cases demonstrate how difficult it can be to draw boundaries
between what is a work event and what is a social event. Employers
should have adequate policies in place to set out what behaviours
will not be tolerated. Employees should be reminded of these
policies before work events and training should be provided where
Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A
top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm
is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent
and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways.
Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the
communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows
that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully
completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business
challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons'
global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local,
national and global needs of private and public clients of any size
in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
You are cordially invited to our workshop on processing of employees’ personal data in light of the new EU Regulation on Personal Data Protection (GDPR). The meeting is organized by Dentons together with the American Chamber of Commerce in Poland.
Dentons will hold a Competition Breakfast Seminar on February 28, 2017 titled: Rebates and discounts under EU competition law – lessons of the Intel case. Renowned competition lawyer James Venit from Dentons’ Brussels office will be joining co-heads Tihamér Tóth and Tünde Gönczöl of Dentons Budapest’s
You are cordially invited to a practical seminar on private antitrust enforcement in light of the soon to be implemented Damages Directive, which we address to the banking and finance sector. During the seminar we will present new tools designed for cartel damages litigation in light of fast forwarding the legislative process in Poland from a lawyer’s and an economist’s perspective. We will discuss examples of private antitrust litigation from a jurisdiction where the system is already effective and consider whether third party litigation funding is an option in Poland. All these points will help you identify potential claims against other market players and prepare a defense strategy against private enforcement claims targeting your institution.
Everyone has sympathy for employees who are genuinely unwell. When advising employers about employees suffering from stress, various medical conditions and resultant absence, it is these words that come up again and again.
In our article published in HR Zone, we consider the introduction of the new rules on regulatory references which come into force on 7 March 2017 and the practical steps that employers must take to comply...
Most of us know the difference between being employed and being self-employed (or at least we think we do). And in everyday laymen's terms, the difference is relatively straightforward and obvious – if you are employed, you work for someone else and, if you are self-employed, you ‘work for yourself'.
This coming year looks to be another busy one with more significant employment law changes coming into force and we have highlighted some of the key changes, which range from the introduction of gender pay...
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).