The FCA has announced that from 2018 it intends to apply the
recently introduced senior managers and certification regime to
investment firms and asset managers. The FCA has said that it
will issue a consultation document shortly and firms that may be
affected will have the opportunity to comment on the proposals.
The senior managers regime was introduced in 7 March 2016 for
banks, building societies, credit unions, PRA-designated investment
firms and branches of foreign banks operating in the UK. It
works alongside the new certification regime for these entities
which is due to "go live" in March 2017.
The FCA has stated that the aim of the new rules is to:
"Enhance and embed a culture of accountability" and to
put an "Increased focus on smaller numbers of senior
functions, supported by responsibility maps".
Whilst we do not know exactly how the senior managers and
certification regime will be implemented for investment firms and
asset managers, we know that it will be based on the current regime
for banks. The FCA says that the new rules will be applied in a
proportionate manner and that they will remove / reduce certain
burdens / requirements (we just don't know which burdens /
requirements will be removed or reduced yet). The aim of this
note is to set out the basics and key features of the regime in
place for the banks, to enable some early planning / consideration
at this time.
The Basics: there are three strands to the new regime:
The Senior Manager Regime ('SMR')
focuses on individuals performing a senior management function
(SMF). The regulators approve individuals wishing to perform these
SMFs before they can be appointed to their specific role.
The Certification Regime applies to the
employees of relevant firms who, in the light of their roles, could
pose a risk of significant harm to the firm, or any of its
customers. These individuals are not pre-approved by the regulators
but must be certified by their firms that they are fit and proper
for their roles on a continuing basis.
Conduct Rules: new conduct rules will apply to
those in SMFs, those in certified roles, and also a wider group of
staff in a firm (other than those who essentially have nothing to
do with the financial services that are provided (a receptionist is
used as an example although this should be questioned)). The
conduct rules that apply to SMFs are more extensive than those that
apply to others in a firm.
The Key Features:
Responsibility Mapping: firms must decide who
is responsible for specific prescribed responsibilities and notify
the regulator. This requires a firm to have mapped out all of its
functions, and all of the duties and tasks which are undertaken,
and to identify where responsibility for these things
People Mapping: identification of SMFs,
certified persons and those covered by Code of Conduct rules, and
appropriate training and agreement with all.
Fitness and propriety checks: firms have a
continuing duty to ensure that individuals who work for them are
fit and proper. To comply, firms should:
hold regular appraisals and performance reviews
carry out additional checks if necessary, depending on the
nature and level of an individual's responsibilities
Regulatory References: new rules on regulatory
references will apply to banks from 7 March 2017. We think it
likely that these rules will be extended more widely.
Whistleblowing Champion: new whistleblowing
rules for banks came in from 7 September 2016. We think it
likely that these rules will also apply more widely.
Not confirmed but expected - by or during Spring 2017:
consultation paper re extending SMR and Certification Regime more
Not confirmed but expected – by or during Autumn 2017:
final rules on SMR and Certification Regime for firms outside of
those already covered [note likely that regulatory reference rules
and whistleblowing rules also to be introduced]
During 2018 (exact timing tbc): Senior Manager and
Certification Regimes will be applied to all FSMA firms – via
Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016 s.21 (not yet in
force). It is expected that SMR and certification regime
implementation dates will be split as per the banks but not yet
In SSE Generation Limited v Hochtief Solutions AG and another decided on 21st December 2016, the Court of Session in Scotland considered a contractor's potential design liability under the NEC Form of Contract.
Case law concerning the Agency Worker Regulations remains limited. We recently advised a recruitment business involved in a dispute with a "temp" and a hirer regarding who was liable for an alleged breach of AWR Regulation 5.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).