The English High Court has recently interpreted the term
"default rate" under the ISDA Master Agreement in one of
a series of cases concerning the administration of Lehman Brothers
International (Europe). We consider the outcome of this case and
its likely impact.
The case arose in the context of a substantial surplus in Lehman
Brothers International (Europe)
("LBIE") administration after
paying for the provable debts owed by LBIE.
Although the process of paying the principal of LBIE's
proved debts completed in 2014, creditors have still not received
any interest in respect of those debts. Many of LBIE's
creditors have claims under ISDA Master Agreements and this case
concerned the scope of their entitlements to default interest under
Meaning of default rate
The ISDA Master Agreement provides that where there is default
on a payment, the party to whom the payment is due,
or relevant payee, is entitled to interest at the
default rate. The default rate, in simple terms, is the cost of
funding plus 1% per annum.
Cost of funding
The Court had to interpret what is meant by "cost of
funding". It held that a party's cost of funding means its
cost of borrowing the relevant amount whether that cost is actual
or hypothetical. The party's "cost of funding" cannot
be calculated by reference to costs associated with any other type
of funding, such as the cost of raising equity finance etc.
Original counterparty's cost of funding
The Court further held that when calculating the cost of
borrowing, it is the cost of the payer's original counterparty
under the contract that must be used as a reference. So even if the
original counterparty sold the interest in the amount payable to a
third party, that third party must calculate the cost of funding
based on the original counterparty's costs and not its own
The outcome of this case will have a significant impact on
the amount of the surplus the administrators will be required to
distribute in respect of statutory interest. Given that the
majority of claims admitted against LBIE arise under an ISDA Master
Agreement, and that these claims represent approximately £4
billion, this decision will be closely analysed by those with an
admitted claim in LBIE's administration.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
We are pleased to sponsor the National Adult Literacy Agency’s (NALA) second Plain English Awards taking place on 9 February. The aim of the awards is to reward organisations that communicate clearly in plain English and to offer free plain English training to those that don’t.
This year, over fifty organisations entered the competition by submitting documents that they thought were outstanding examples of plain English and an independent panel of plain English experts judged the entries.
The Financial Conduct Authority FCA has published the interim feedback to the call for input to the post-implementation review of the FCA's crowdfunding rules (FS16/13) (the Interim Feedback Report)...
On 11 October 2016 the FRC published its advice to audit committee chairs and finance directors of listed companies, highlighting key issues and improvements it considers can be made to annual reports in the 2016 reporting season.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).