We had a great turnout on Thursday morning for the Lending for
the Private Rented Sector (PRS) seminar at our London offices. We
had over 60 external attendees, with clients from
RBS, Savills, Barclays, Capita Asset Services, Lloyds
Banking Group, and Wells Fargo. Presenters
included Francisca Sepulveda of Reed Smith, George
Cotterell of Venn Partners, Gareth Blacker of the Homes and
Communities Agency (HCA), Sharon Quinlan of Barclays, and Tom
Stenhouse of Patrizia UK.
Discussion centred on the healthy interest in the PRS market
from established developers as well as new entrants to the market;
with some commercial developers showing interest in this sector. It
was discussed how lenders do remain cautious due to scarce historic
information available to fully understand the risks; particularly
in the transition phase between PC and a site being fully or
near-fully let. In addition, the length of development time for a
PRS scheme is a barrier to a number of lenders in the market. To
combat these risks, quality sites, developers and investors with a
track record are crucial.
HCA spoke about how they provide a flexible package of
assistance for infrastructure development; ranging from the letter
of comfort scheme, operated by Venn Partners, to providing
mezzanine and infrastructure finance. It was noted that HCA
mezzanine finance is not intended to compete against the mezzanine
lenders in the market, but rather assist where the mezzanine slice
would not reach a high enough yield (among other factors). Once
fully or near-fully let, a PRS facility operates in the same way as
the other residential deals that lenders have been acquainted with
for some time.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The choice of procurement route is vitally important to the success of any construction project. A number of different procurement routes exist but what are the essential ingredients of each and what are their relative advantages and disadvantages? This article discusses the differences between two of those procurement routes: general contracting and design and build.
Bonds, guarantees, performance security or whatever they are called form an important part of every major international contract. Despite this, there are a regular number of cases, in many different jurisdictions, where the courts are asked to decide what the nature of the particular project security actually is.
For well over a hundred years it has been standard practice for contract administrators to be used on construction contracts. Architects have been engaged to supervise and manage building contracts and engineers engineering contracts. More recently, project managers and construction managers have undertaken similar roles under new forms of contract.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).