A decision by the Manchester Employment Tribunal at a
preliminary hearing, in what is the largest ever private-sector
equal pay case, has opened the floodgates for a wave of claims
Under UK legislation, female employees are entitled to enjoy
contractual terms that are as favourable as those of a male
comparator, if they are employed in jobs of equal work. The key
issue in the Asda case is whether the supermarket's in-store
staff roles, which are mainly held by female workers, are of equal
value to higher-paid jobs in its male-dominated distribution
At the preliminary hearing, the Tribunal had to determine
whether the Asda store workers could compare themselves to the
distribution workers for the purposes of an equal pay claim.
Under section 79 of the Equality Act 2010, an equal pay
comparison is only valid between the claimant and a chosen
comparator if they are both employed by the same employer and work
at the same establishment; or if they are both employed by the same
employer and work at different establishments but 'common terms
apply at the establishments'.
Asda sought to argue that the sets of employees were not
comparable as they were based in different locations with different
pay arrangements, and that the pay differentials reflected market
rates. However, the Tribunal was not convinced by this argument and
held that the statutory test was met and, as such, that the
distribution workers are a suitable comparator.
This ruling will now mean that the test case can proceed and
will clear the way for over 7,000 claims currently in waiting to
follow. The claimants in these cases are seeking rectification and
compensation for historic discrimination, and it is estimated that
the total value of the claims could exceed £100million.
Whilst this is just a decision in respect of a preliminary
matter, and we will be keeping a careful eye on the test case as it
unfolds, the decision is likely to impact on other employers in the
retail space, as the disparity between shop floor staff and
warehouse staff is not unusual.
In light of this preliminary ruling, employers may wish to
reassess how they carry out job-evaluation across the whole of
their business; and ensure that equal pay considerations are kept
in mind cross-establishment.
Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A
top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm
is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent
and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways.
Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the
communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows
that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully
completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business
challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons'
global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local,
national and global needs of private and public clients of any size
in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
You are cordially invited to our workshop on processing of employees’ personal data in light of the new EU Regulation on Personal Data Protection (GDPR). The meeting is organized by Dentons together with the American Chamber of Commerce in Poland.
Dentons will hold a Competition Breakfast Seminar on February 28, 2017 titled: Rebates and discounts under EU competition law – lessons of the Intel case. Renowned competition lawyer James Venit from Dentons’ Brussels office will be joining co-heads Tihamér Tóth and Tünde Gönczöl of Dentons Budapest’s
You are cordially invited to a practical seminar on private antitrust enforcement in light of the soon to be implemented Damages Directive, which we address to the banking and finance sector. During the seminar we will present new tools designed for cartel damages litigation in light of fast forwarding the legislative process in Poland from a lawyer’s and an economist’s perspective. We will discuss examples of private antitrust litigation from a jurisdiction where the system is already effective and consider whether third party litigation funding is an option in Poland. All these points will help you identify potential claims against other market players and prepare a defense strategy against private enforcement claims targeting your institution.
Everyone has sympathy for employees who are genuinely unwell. When advising employers about employees suffering from stress, various medical conditions and resultant absence, it is these words that come up again and again.
In our article published in HR Zone, we consider the introduction of the new rules on regulatory references which come into force on 7 March 2017 and the practical steps that employers must take to comply...
Most of us know the difference between being employed and being self-employed (or at least we think we do). And in everyday laymen's terms, the difference is relatively straightforward and obvious – if you are employed, you work for someone else and, if you are self-employed, you ‘work for yourself'.
This coming year looks to be another busy one with more significant employment law changes coming into force and we have highlighted some of the key changes, which range from the introduction of gender pay...
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).