UK: Mixed Results For Valuer: Barclays Bank V Christie Owen & Davies (Trading As Christie & Co) [2016]

Last Updated: 17 October 2016
Article by Tom White and Vicky Hardy

Most Read Contributor in UK, September 2016

The Chancery Division handed down judgment on 30 September in this valuer's negligence claim. The judgment dealt with some key issues relating to: (1) aggregate value in a portfolio; (2) the appropriate methodology when valuing a trading property; (3) the relevance of an agreed sale price; and (4) contributory negligence, which will be of interest to valuers and their professional indemnity insurers.


The Defendant ("Christie") valued 3 amusement arcades in Great Yarmouth for the Claimant ("Barclays") in February 2007. The valuations were at £2,700,000 for Circus Circus and the Golden Nugget ("CCGN") and £1,500,000 for the Flamingo, giving a total value of £4,200,000.

The valuations were for the purposes of an application by Mr and Mrs Thurston to Barclays. The application was for a loan of £1,800,000 to enable Thurston UK Limited ("the Borrower") to purchase the Flamingo for £1,600,000, with the remaining £200,000 to pay for alterations to all 3 arcades to enable them to be joined together.

The loan and purchase proceeded on the basis that the overall lending to the Borrower, including existing borrowing secured against CCGN, remained within a maximum total loan to value ratio of 67% of the value of the 3 arcades. The alterations were carried out to the arcades, but by October 2010 the Borrower was in administration. In March 2011 the 3 arcades were sold for the combined sum of £1,350,000, meaning Barclays suffered a significant loss.

Allegations in relation to true value

Barclays alleged that the arcades were negligently overvalued by Christie in February 2007. The alleged true values were c£2,100,000 for CCGN (£600,000, or 29%, alleged overvaluation) and c£1,000,000 for the Flamingo (£500,000, or 50%, alleged overvaluation), so they were alleged to be outside an acceptable margin of error. Christie contended that the true values were in fact £2,500,000 for CCGN and £1,500,000 for the Flamingo, so – at a variance of only £200,000, or 5% overall – within an acceptable margin of error. The experts agreed on 15% as the appropriate margin of error.

Issues for consideration

The following key issues fell for consideration by the judge in reaching a decision about this claim:

  • Value on a separate or aggregate basis in a portfolio;
  • Correct methodology for valuing a trading property;
  • Relevance of an agreed sale price:
  • Contributory negligence.

The findings of the judge (Richard Spearman QC) on each of these key issues is summarised below.

Decision on true value and margin of error

The judge held that CCGN was worth c£2,300,000 and the Flamingo was worth c£1,200,000, and that they were worth £3,500,000 in total. This fell between the valuation figures offered by the parties' experts, based on consideration of numerous differences of opinion between the experts on the minutiae of the valuations.

The judge accepted that it was for the court to determine the issue of margin of error, but saw no reason to depart from the agreed figure of 15% for these unusual properties.

Value on a separate or aggregate basis in a portfolio

Even though the 3 arcades had been valued in two tranches (CCGN in one report and the Flamingo in the other), the judge found that it was the aggregate value that mattered the most for this portfolio lending: "I consider that it is this overall difference which matters most, because (as appears from the contemporaneous documents) Barclays was looking at the security of [all the properties] together when deciding whether to make the Treasury Loan".

There was, however, more than a 15% difference between the value of CCGN and the Flamingo both separately and on a combined basis when compared to Christie's valuations:

Property Christie Valuation Court finding on true value % deviation from true value Extent of overvaluation
CCGN 2,700,000 2,317,279.50 17% 382,720.50
Flamingo 1,500,000 1,185,738.00 27% 314,262.00
CCGN and Flamingo combined 4,200,000 3,500,000 (in round terms) 20% 700,000 (in round terms)

As such, the judge did not need to (or go on to) make a specific finding that the valuation of multiple properties should be judged on the aggregate valuation rather than each individual property.

Correct methodology for valuing a trading property

Barclays contended that a reasonably competent valuer would have carried out these trading valuations by assessing the earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation ("EBITDA") of a reasonably competent operator of the properties, then valuing based on a multiplier derived from considering the EBITDA of comparable arcade sales.

They contended that there was sufficient evidence available for Christie to carry out an EBITDA valuation, there is no evidence that other methodologies were used in the market and there was no better evidence to support a more robust valuation on another basis. These submissions were accepted by the judge on the facts of this case, and it was held that Christie were negligent to have valued by reference to turnover.

It was however acknowledged that some valuations may need to be carried out on some other basis where there is insufficient evidence to carry out an EBITDA valuation.

Agreed sale price

The Borrower had agreed to purchase the Flamingo for £1,600,000, and both parties' experts agreed that where a property has just been sold, the sale is potentially the most cogent evidence of the open market value of the property, provided the property was properly exposed to the market and marketed competently.

On the facts of this particular case though, the judge concluded that it was unsafe to regard the purchase price as strong evidence of open market value. The reasons for this were as follows:

  1. there was no evidence that the Flamingo was freely and competently marketed on the open market;
  2. the Borrower, as owner of the two neighbouring arcades, was a 'special purchaser' and was therefore likely to pay more than the market value of the Flamingo;
  3. the Borrower, and the Thurstons behind it, were experienced at running amusement arcades, but not buying and selling them; and
  4. the Thurstons were shown to have been "financial risk-takers".

The judge acknowledged that although some of these factors may not have been known to Christie, they were of relevance in this particular case in determining that it was unsafe to place weight on the Borrower's willingness to pay £1,600,000 for the Flamingo.

Contributory negligence

As regards contributory negligence, the issue which resonated with the judge was the fact that the Thurstons obtained a mortgage advance of £300,000 in 2003 for the purposes of the business of the Borrower, but instead used the money to purchase property in Spain. This was known by Barclays in 2006 when the mortgage application for £1,800,000 was made, but it was recorded that the Borrower had complied with previous conditions of sanction when this was not in fact the case.

The judge concluded that, despite a 25-year banking relationship, this black mark over the integrity of the Borrower would have caused a reasonably competent bank to refuse the loan, or at the very least it would have carried out a more robust financial evaluation of the serviceability of the loan and actual/forecast profits than Barclays in fact did, which would have caused the application to be refused.

The judge concluded that the appropriate reduction for contributory negligence in this instance was 40%. Due to the fact that Barclays overlooked the lack of integrity issue, its due diligence of the financial position of the Borrower was then subject to criticism. Without this special circumstance this would not have been the case.

It should be noted that Barclays did not disclose a lending policy for arcades, or even the lending policy for leisure and hospitality referred to by its witnesses. This was considered to be unfortunate by the judge, and he stated "I have subjected the evidence which I have heard to a degree of critical appraisal which I consider to be commensurate with the fact that it cannot be tested by reference to examination of the contents of these documents." He did however conclude (based on other contemporaneous documents and witness evidence) that the lending decision, particularly relating to the loan to value ratio, did not contravene any lending policy of Barclays.


The judge found that the valuations were negligent and that the extent of the overvaluation was £700,000. The transactional loss to Barclays was found to be £1,022,523.19 (subject to further argument about cost of funding/interest as the parties could not agree between 1 month or 3 month LIBOR).

Subject to the cost of funding/interest argument, it was held that Barclays is entitled to judgment for £613,513.92 (60% of £1,022,523.19) on the basis that transactional losses with contributory negligence deductions fall below the extent of the overvaluation in this instance.

This case offers useful guidance to valuers regarding the potential for valuations to be considered collectively where there is portfolio lending, the use of EBITDA valuation methodology to value trading properties, and reiterates that an agreed purchase price is cogent evidence of market value unless there are particular reasons why this would not be the case. It is also a welcome example of a fairly significant contributory negligence deduction for a lender overlooking a fundamental issue relating to borrower integrity.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.