With effect from 19 August 2016, the National Bank of Ukraine
(the "NBU") abolished the requirement
for Ukrainian residents to obtain a price evaluation act – an
approval from State Enterprise "State Research and Information
Centre for International Commodity Markets Monitoring"
("Derzhzovnishinform") – for
cross-border payments for purchases of IP rights from foreign
residents for the value exceeding EUR 50,000.
The reasoning behind price evaluation acts was that they were
supposed to prevent non-productive outflows of capital from Ukraine
in the form of payments for intangible assets, such as IP rights.
Where payments exceeded the regulatory threshold (most recently,
EUR 50,000), a Ukrainian payer was required to apply to
Derzhzovnishinform for the document (price evaluation act)
confirming that the price of IP rights purchased under the contract
was consistent with their fair market value. If a price evaluation
act was not available, Ukrainian banks were prohibited from
arranging the payment (save for a few exceptions).
Abolishment of the price evaluation act
requirement is definitely a positive step in terms of simplifying
cross-border activities of the Ukrainian business. At the same
time, the NBU still maintains control over similar outbound
transfers. In particular, the NBU is currently empowered to review
the underlying documentation and suspend outbound transfers
exceeding USD 50,000.
The NBU also continues its policy of
strengthening the financial monitoring procedures and increasing
the level of control by Ukrainian banks over capital outflows. In
particular, the NBU has instructed Ukrainian banks to carry out a
detailed analysis of transactions and obtain additional
documentation from clients, where the bank has concerns that the
contractual price of goods, services or assets may be inconsistent
with their fair market value.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Trading under your name is an appealing idea, especially in the fashion world where designers frequently use their own names as brands (think Hugo Boss, Donatella Versace, and Tom Ford, to name but a few).
1.The trade mark shall not entitle the proprietor to prohibit its use in relation to goods which have been put on the market in the Community under that trade mark by the proprietor or with his consent.
The future of the European Unified Patent Court (UPC) appears to look a bit clearer following recent ratification activities. On 16 January 2017, the Preparatory Committee for the UPC announced on its website that it is working under the assumption that the UPC can become operational in December 2017.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).