European Union: EU Cartel Enforcement In June 2016

Last Updated: 14 July 2016
Article by Martin Favart

Most Read Contributor in Belgium, October 2017

In the following sections, we first provide a factual overview of significant case developments at EU level, and thereafter provide a detailed analysis of important substantive or procedural developments addressed in these cases.

1. Summary of Significant Case Developments

General Court confirms Commission's decision in pre-stressing steel cartel case against four producers

On 2 June 2016, the General Court ("GC") of the European Union issued a judgment upholding the Commission's 2010 decision against a price-fixing and market-sharing cartel for pre-stressing steel (see VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2010, No. 6, available at  The judgment addresses appeals brought by four producers.  In its joined judgment, the GC dismissed all of the allegations of Commission errors, including on the attribution of liability, the existence of a single economic unit and of a single and continuous infringement, the calculation of the fine and the applicants' ability to pay the fine (Joined Cases T 426/10 to T 429/10, T 438/12 to T 441/12, Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías and others).

Court of Justice upholds General Court's judgment in Spanish bitumen cartel case

On 9 June 2016, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("ECJ") dismissed appeals by Proas, Repsol and Cepsa concerning the Commission's 2007 decision against a market sharing and price coordination cartel for the supply of bitumen in Spain (see VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2007, No. 10, available at  The ECJ's judgment follows the previous judgment of the GC, upholding the Commission's decision and rejecting the parties' appeals (see VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2013, No. 9, available at In its judgments, the ECJ rejected all the claims brought by Proas, Cepsa and Repsol, which related, inter alia, to the interpretation of the 2002 Leniency Notice, the proportionality of the fine imposed and the observation of a reasonable period for adjudication (Case C-608/13,  Compañía Española de Petróleos (CEPSA); Case C-616/13, Productos Asfálticos (PROAS); Case C-617/13, Repsol).

Court of Justice dismisses appeals in calcium and magnesium reagents cartel case

On 16 June 2016, the ECJ dismissed appeals by Evonik Degussa (Case C-155/14, Evonik Degussa) and SKW Holding (Case C-154/14, SKW Holding) concerning the Commission's 2009 decision against a price fixing and market sharing cartel for calcium carbide and magnesium-based reagents (see VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2009, No. 8, available at The ECJ's judgment follows the previous judgments of the GC, which dismissed the appeal brought by SKW Holding, but decreased the fine imposed on Evonik Degussa because the Commission had erred in the calculation of the fine and in the application of the Leniency Notice (see VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2013, No. 1, available at  The pleas discussed, and ultimately rejected by the ECJ, included the right to be heard and the principle of proportionality, the application of parental liability, the principle of equal treatment in calculating the fine and the interpretation of the Leniency Notice.

2. Analysis of Important Substantive and Procedural Developments

Spanish Bitumen cartel case: The principle of observance of a "Reasonable Period"

Under the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, parties appealing a decision have the right to have a case adjudicated within a reasonable period of time. In the present case, the judicial proceedings before the GC had lasted over five years, which the appellants argued breached this principle, and thus the parties requested that the ECJ reduce the fine imposed by the Commission.

In the Proas and Cepsa judgments, the ECJ, in line with its established case law, held that claims for breach of the principle of observance of a "reasonable period" may be brought in a separate appeal before the GC, under Article 256(1) TFEU. A claim for compensation for the damage caused by the GC's failure to adjudicate within a reasonable time may not be made directly to the ECJ in the context of an appeal against the original Commission decision.

However, the ECJ also held that it may note, where it is clear, the fact that the GC infringed, in a sufficiently serious manner, its obligation to adjudicate on the case within a reasonable time. The ECJ noted that this applied in the case at hand, where the proceedings before the GC had lasted almost 5 years and 9 months, including a period of 4 years and 1 month between the end of the written procedure and the hearing in which no procedural step took place, a duration which could not be explained by either the nature or the complexity of the case or by its context. If the appellants now were to decide to pursue a separate action for damages in the matter before the GC, these findings of the ECJ would likely be very helpful for their case.

Spanish Bitumen cartel case: Leniency – reduction of fines: Clarifications as to the meaning of the wording "facts previously unknown"

The leniency procedure rewards undertakings involved in a cartel which are willing to put an end to their participation in the infringement and assist the Commission with its investigation of the infringement. The first applicant can be granted immunity from the fine. Subsequent applicants can be granted fine reductions if the information they provide represents significant added value with respect to the evidence already in the Commission's possession. In addition, if a subsequent applicant provides evidence relating to "facts previously unknown" to the Commission that have a direct bearing on the gravity or duration of the alleged cartel, the Commission will not take these aggravating elements into account when setting the fine with regard to that applicant, so that the applicant will not be more severely sanctioned due to these aggravating elements.

In the Repsol judgment, the ECJ held that evidence provided by a leniency applicant will only relate to "facts previously unknown" to the Commission if this evidence objectively presents significant added value with respect to the evidence already in the Commission's file.

The issue in the present case was raised after a subsequent leniency applicant claimed that, although the Commission was in possession of evidence showing the actual (longer) duration of an alleged infringement, the Commission had no "cognitive knowledge" of such longer duration as it had not yet reviewed all the relevant documents in its possession and thus had not gained "cognitive knowledge" of the longer duration of the infringement. The immunity applicant had, in its immunity application, indicated a shorter duration of the infringement. The subsequent leniency applicant therefore claimed that before it provided information on the actual duration of the infringement in its leniency application, that information was unknown to the Commission, and thus it should not have been taken into account by the Commission when computing the fine to be imposed on the leniency applicant.

The ECJ dismissed the "cognitive knowledge" criterion put forward by the leniency applicant on two grounds.

First, it relied on the general scheme of the 2002 Leniency Notice which only grants reductions of fines to subsequent leniency applicants if the evidence provided by them has significant added value compared to that already in the Commission's possession. The ECJ found this general principle (pertaining to the Commission already being in possession of evidence) to also be applicable to additional information provided by subsequent leniency applicants with regard to the gravity or the duration of the alleged infringement.

Second, the ECJ found that physical possession of evidence by the Commission amounts to knowledge of the facts it contains, regardless of whether the Commission has already examined or analysed that evidence. It follows from the above that a subsequent leniency applicant merely highlighting elements that were already in the Commission's file will not be entitled to claim that these facts should not be taken into account when setting the fine to be imposed on that applicant.

Calcium and magnesium reagents cartel case: The rebuttable presumption of decisive influence

Under EU law, a parent company can be held liable for its subsidiary's illicit behaviour. A rebuttable presumption of the "actual exercise of decisive influence" by the parent company over its subsidiary is considered to apply if the parent company holds, directly or indirectly, all or almost all of the capital of a subsidiary. This presumption can in principle be rebutted by adducing evidence relating to the organisational, economic and legal links between the two companies which demonstrates that the two companies do not form a single economic entity. No exhaustive list of factors which can constitute such evidence exists. The EU courts must therefore take into consideration all relevant factors depending on the case at issue. 

In the Evonik Degussa judgment, the appellants claimed that the GC had infringed Article 101 TFEU and the principles of personal responsibility and the presumption of innocence by making the rebuttal of the presumption overly strict, contrary to its rebuttable nature.

In the ECJ's response rejecting the arguments put forward by the appellants, two points are noteworthy. First, although in principle it is incumbent upon the GC to carry out an assessment of the facts which are contemporaneous with the period of the infringement, it may rely on elements relating to a prior period, to the extent that the GC is able to establish the relevance of those elements for the period of the infringement.

Second, the GC had held that the fact that a subsidiary did not comply with express instructions from its parent company to refrain from participating in anti-competitive practices was a strong indication of the actual exercise of decisive influence by the parent company. The ECJ however criticised the GC for this reasoning, holding that the existence of such instructions constitutes only an indication of the actual exercise of decisive influence. Nonetheless, according to previous case law, it is not necessary for the subsidiary to comply with all of the parent company's instructions in order to demonstrate decisive influence, so long as failure to carry out those instructions is not the norm. Despite the ECJ's correction of the GC's finding, it remains difficult to rebut the presumption that a parent company and its subsidiary form a single economic unit.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.