UK: Ryanair v Secretary Of State For The Home Department: A More Reasonable Standard In Respect Of Carrier Responsibility For Identification Of Passengers?

Last Updated: 11 July 2016
Article by Dylan Jones

Most Read Contributor in UK, September 2017

On 26 May 2015, two passengers aboard a Ryanair flight from Palma de Mallorca arrived at Edinburgh Airport. The two were travelling on Greek passports which had been inspected at least twice, including once by Spanish officials, before boarding the flight with no apparent problems. In Edinburgh, the two were stopped by UK Border Force officers who identified irregularities with the passengers' documents. The passports were determined to be forgeries and the two passengers identified as Albanian nationals and detained. As a result of its failure to pick up on the false documents, Ryanair was charged GBP 2,000 for each passenger, totalling GBP 4,000, under long-standing UK regulations.

These charges and the policy behind them have been opposed by carriers since their inception, with little promise of repeal or satisfactory recourse. Carriers now consider the majority of individual charges not worth the cost of challenging, and are mostly resigned to living with this hefty cost of doing business (for instance, Ryanair offered evidence that these charges amount to over GBP 400,000 per year for the airline).

Choosing to challenge these particular charges rather than accept them as business as usual, Ryanair appealed the decision of the Home Office to the Court; and with the comprehensive and at times highly critical ruling in Ryanair v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Central London County Court may have provided an opportunity to shake up the current state of affairs.

History of regulation

Immigration (Carriers' Liability) Act 1987 ("ICLA")

The ICLA first imposed financial sanctions on carriers bringing passengers to the UK who lack the necessary entry documents; the underlying policy being to prevent those wishing to enter the UK illegally from doing so. The ICLA imposed fines of GBP 1,000 for each illegal entrant brought to the United Kingdom. This fine was doubled to GBP 2,000 in August 1991 and two years later was extended to cover passengers without transit visas where these were required.

The ICLA provided a defence whereby a carrier is not liable for the falsity of a document if such falsity is not "reasonably apparent", but the legislation provided no definition or guidance as to under what circumstances irregularities in a travel document may be "reasonably apparent".

The ICLA was met with strong opposition from the air transport industry, which argued that it was inappropriate for private carriers to assume the public role of immigration officers. The ICLA was implemented in the face of this opposition – and very strictly implemented from the very start. Charges of several million pounds began to be levied and by the mid-1990s reached an average of GBP 12 million per year.

Following implementation of the ICLA, a major complaint arose that carriers were being fined for passengers who did not possess the proper travel documents, but who had been reviewed and had their documents approved for entry by national border and immigration officials, including UK authorities. Further, these passengers included legitimate business travellers and tourists, rather than those individuals targeted by the legislation.

In response, the Approved Gate Check Status ("AGC") scheme was introduced in which charges are waived in respect of passengers arriving from approved AGC airports with improper documentation. An appeals process was also adopted in which carriers' could appeal to the enforcement authorities for the review of individual cases and guidelines were issued allowing the authorities to use discretion in particular circumstances.

Notwithstanding these moderating measures, the fines and responsibilities placed on carriers continued to prove significant.

Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 – Section 40 ("1999 Act")

Section 40 of the 1999 Act replaced the ICLA (which has now been repealed). However, the liability of carriers for charges incurred in respect of the transport of persons arriving in the UK without proper documentation remains.

The 1999 Act maintains the GBP 2,000 charge per individual. Likewise, the carrier has a defence if it is able to show that the falsity of the document is not "reasonably apparent"; however, the Home Office has produced greater guidance in determining what standard of falsity amounts to "reasonably apparent". Additionally, the legislation provides a more robust and clear-cut appeals process.

According to the official guidance, the falsity of a document is "reasonably apparent" "if it is of a standard which a trained representative of the carrying company, examining it carefully but briefly and without the use of technological aids, could reasonably be expected to detect". Further, "a 'trained representative' would be expected to have a level of basic knowledge of how to identify false documents, but not to be expert nor to have the resources for a highly detailed examination". As will be seen below, this guidance fails to provide much clarity.

Carriers are also afforded a more structured appeals process that includes judicial review. On receiving a Notification of Charge, carriers have 30 days in which to make representations and provide accompanying evidence explaining why the carrier believes it is not liable to the charge. Representations are usually made in writing; however, large carriers with a large number of charges hold regular meetings with officials to present their representations verbally.

Following review of the representations, officials may choose to waive the charge or issue a Charge Notice advising the carrier that it has 30 days to pay the charge. If the carrier continues to believe that a charge should not have been imposed, it may make a written objection to the Home Secretary or appeal directly to the Court.

A written objection must provide reasons for the objection and be delivered within 28 days of the Charge Notice. An appeal must be filed within 28 days of the Charge Notice or, if the carrier has made a written objection, within 28 days of service of the Home Office decision responding to the objection.

Ryanair v Secretary of State for the Home Department

The case concerns two Albanian nationals (a man and woman) traveling on forged Greek passports. It is unclear how the two made it to Spain, but it was not contested that the falsified passports were reviewed by the Spanish police at border control in Palma de Mallorca before reaching Ryanair's ground control staff and that the Spanish police did not identify them as suspicious.

UK immigration officials determined the passports were forged based upon two specific issues: (i) there was no green to blue colour shift in the ink spelling the word 'HELLAS' when holding the passports in light and slightly tipping them; and (ii) the Greek flag concealed in the top left-hand corner of the biodata page was slightly cut off. Ryanair was charged under s.40 of the 1999 Act for both individuals.

Ryanair made a representation to UK Border Force officials that the falsities of the documents in question were not "reasonably apparent". Upon brief review, the officials disagreed. Ryanair chose to appeal this decision to the Central London County Court. On 21 January 2016, the Court issued its opinion in favour of Ryanair and requiring the Home Office to adopt a clearer, reasonable and objective standard.

In determining the applicable standard to which a carrier should be held, the Court turned to the guidance produced by the Home Office discussed above, and the direction that a falsity is reasonably apparent "if it is of a standard which a trained representative of the carrying company, examining it carefully but briefly and without the use of technological aids, could reasonably be expected to detect". The Court found this guidance to be confusing and difficult to interpret; and that this lack of clarity results in carriers not being able to fully understand their obligations.

The Court also determined that the official guidance is frequently changed without adequate notification or emphasis on its importance. The result, as the Court stated, is an "inconsistent application of inconsistent standards" and a more reasonable objective standard must be adopted.

The Court's criticism of the manner in which the charges are currently levied, and the seemingly out-of-hand way they were handled in the matter at issue, went so far as to explicitly instruct the Home Office that it must not regard the charges as a "revenue raising exercise".

The Court sought to establish what elements may go toward a proper standard. First, "it is clear that the standard expected of a trained representative...must be lower" than the professionals at the UK Border Force. Second, where national immigration authorities and trained carrier representatives with basic knowledge both fail to identify any irregularities, this must be evidence that goes toward determining whether or not such irregularities can be regarded as being reasonably apparent.

The Court stated that there should be no general expectation on the part of the Home Office that trained carrier representatives with basic knowledge be expected to detect irregularities that go undetected by national border control authorities. That said, irregularities that go undetected by national authorities would not automatically exculpate a carrier from identifying reasonably apparent problems in a document. However, if both fail to spot the issue, it seemed to the Court that, without further evidence of negligence or corruption or similar intervening events, this amounts to evidence against any suggestions that such an irregularity was reasonably apparent. The Court stated "it is not the job of the carriers to permit or refuse entry or exit; that duty under UK law lies with the Border Force", whereas the carrier's duty is to look for reasonably apparent irregularities and alert the relevant authorities of the same.

The Court concluded that the burden is on the Home Office to establish on a balance of the probabilities that the issues complained of were indeed reasonably apparent based upon a reasonable and objective standard and that each event must be considered on its own circumstances. In this particular instance there was "powerful evidence" against finding the irregularities were reasonably apparent.

Future Issues and potential future regulation

It is difficult to imagine that the charges against carriers in this area will be radically revisited as the result of a single, non-precedential County Court ruling. And while it is unclear whether the Home Office will appeal the ruling, it seems much more likely that the UK authorities will continue to levy the charges when falsities are reasonably apparent depending upon the circumstances - and carriers will continue to pay the charges.

In fact, rather than scaling back current carrier charges, new, additional carrier charges are being proposed. The Immigration Bill 2015/2016 presently being considered by Parliament includes provisions allowing for new civil penalties for carriers who fail to properly direct passengers to immigration control at the UK border.

It will be interesting to see if further challenges are made by carriers to future changes; or if the decision in Ryanair is to be regarded as a one-off happy result while the unhappy status quo continues.

Ryanair v Secretary Of State For The Home Department: A More Reasonable Standard In Respect Of Carrier Responsibility For Identification Of Passengers?

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.